{"id":1396,"date":"2023-01-06T17:22:16","date_gmt":"2023-01-06T17:22:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cftheater.info\/blog\/?p=1396"},"modified":"2023-03-11T15:09:45","modified_gmt":"2023-03-11T15:09:45","slug":"1396","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cftheater.info\/blog\/1396\/","title":{"rendered":"Atoms Are Talking!"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

<\/a> ATOMS ARE TALKING!<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n


A Cosmic Language to Empower Chemistry<\/p>\n\n\n\n

by<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Frank W. Andres<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00a9 Copyright, Frank W. Andres, 2022.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

All Rights Reserved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Please visit us at our website…http:\/\/www.CFTheater. Info<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Please give us your comments and ideas at Andres.Frank @Yahoo.Com<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Our blog is actually a small website inside of a large one…in which all<\/p>\n\n\n\n

things are free…Everything on our larger site is either free or very inexpensive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We all…and we mean you, too.!..We all need to work together in Creative Clusters to help build the Future!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Introduction<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, we have been excited for some time because using our new Science of Everything, our new Scientific Method, and our new way of conducting experiments, we were very surprised to understand with a great deal of certainty \u2013 that each atom in the cosmos possesses: Consciousness. However, in our last minibook there was a new surprise which has cleared up a lot of questions concerning: 1) why atoms in general have not shown a tendency to show their Consciousness; and 2) where in the heck gravity might be \u2013 in all of this. The answer to this second puzzle is: Black Holes! As is above, so is it: below. It appears that at the time of the Big Bang there was sufficient heat and pressure to fill that first blast of energy \u2013 with Consciousness. Consciousness was shattered \u2013 into countless tiny Black Holes \u2013 formerly thought to be as small as the size of atoms, but now we think they were probably even smaller. These tiny Black Holes – these ‘I<\/em>– particles’ were placed in the first atoms ever created \u2013 which were hydrogen atoms. These hydrogen atoms were endowed with mass, electrons, and electromagnetic fields at that time. It now appears that no more atoms have been created with Consciousness since then. Well, that is not strictly true. Helium atoms possess Consciousness \u2013 yet they were formed from hydrogen atoms. Thus helium atoms possess two \u2013 yes – two Black Holes \u2013 evidently rotating around each other in an eternal emabrace of two I<\/em>s. All other elements have been created since the Big Bang. They do not possess Consciousness \u2013 and the fact that they have mass seems to have come courtesy of the Higgs Boson.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So this minibook originally was to be about all the elements in the periodic table \u2013 how they all possess Consciousness \u2013 how we may be able to talk to them \u2013 and hopefully persuade them somehow \u2013 to help create a new world \u2013 or at least one which humanity will be able to inhabit for a little while longer. Instead \u2013 we find ourselves writing a different book.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Okay \u2013 so not that different \u2013 as unlikely as that prospect might be. The fact is: 99.3 percent of all atoms in the cosmos are either hydrogen atoms (70 percent) or helium atoms ( 29.3 percent) \u2013 so there we are! : 99.3 percent of the atoms in the cosmos possess Consciousness \u2013 we were off by 0.7 percent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sorry. It is just that things seem a lot different now with these new ideas – that is: Only 2 elements possess consciousness, not 109 of the natural elements that we proposed before. So obviously strategies for working with atoms must change now – somehow \u2013 in different ways. Well, this is an introduction \u2013 and we do really seem to go on a bit. So let us leave the rest of the talking to the rest of the minibook \u2013 well, to the atoms who are the focus of our concern.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Atoms are Talking<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In our minibook on Plato, we saw where Plato and other Greeks understood that there were cosmic ‘virtues’ that guide man and woman’s actions \u2013 and these are Will, Beauty, Truth, Beauty, and Justice. We assert that these ‘virtues’ are actually cosmic attributes displayed by every particle in the universe. We are going to look at all of these attributes and see how they.might relate to communication among particles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But first let us look at these attributes in a more generalized way: we are going to use our Science of Everything to examine aspects of electromagnetic waves and how atomic nuclei are using them to impact and communicate with everything around them. We are going to look at atomic fields and see how they empower atoms and allow nuclei to change the world. Of course \u2013 as we have done many times in minibooks to this point: We can learn much from the hydrogen ion, the I, <\/em>in our own brain. If we think about it \u2013 if we really focus our attention upon it – we can become fully aware of what our I<\/em> is doing, and how it is doing it. [And now \u2013 we realize that we are viewing the world \u2013 from the perspective of the center of a Black Hole!] Our I<\/em> is the nucleus of an atom \u2013 so the I-<\/em>particle in our brain can actually \u2013 really – tell us a lot about things we have never considered before.- that instruments cannot describe, examine or measure \u2013 as the cosmos is composed entirely of entities that are too small, and are moving too fast for the instruments that we have to examine them \u2013 let alone measure in any way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What do fields like electromagnetic fields have to do with communciation? Well, electromagnetic waves have a wide range of frequencies. Some are utilized by organisms for vision, and hearing \u2013 as well as specialized abilites of some to perceive higher or lower frequencies than most other animals do. Streams of electromagnetic energy are used by humans to broadcast radio programs \u2013 so the ability of these waves to transmit information is well known. The question is: why are particles attached to such waves? Do they use them to send messages of their own? What messages are sent, to whom, and in what language? If we can intercept such messages we may be able to decipher what their messges are about and perhaps we can learn to use such a cosmic language ourselves to encourage atoms to do what we want.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But first \u2013 more about the physical nature of these waves: Streams of electrons and streams of photons both generate electromagnetic waves which attend the movement of these particles. Nuclei of atoms possess such waves also \u2013 but nuclei normally do not stream \u2013 they just sit there – or move a bit to activate their waves. Even in the brain \u2013 ions move some but not much \u2013 their waves move into a vacant area next to the circumference edge of a neuron where waves overlap and information is able to flow at great speeds from one side of the brain to the other. It is the information that is moving in the brain mostly \u2013 little else!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As we say: electromagnetic waves accompany all three particles that compose an atom and convey energy from one place to another. The nucleus, the electrons that swarm about the nuclei, and light \u2013 that is, the photon – which is the energy-conveying boson in chemical activity \u2013 all three of these particles possess electromagnetic fields. The ‘electro’ part of the name ‘electromagnetic’ was conferred upon this wave before the particle \u2013 well, the electron – was found. Thus the name ‘electro’ must be considered carefully in order to discern exactly what its propeties actually are. We shall consider the magnetic part of the wave in a moment. As we say: For all three particles there is the particle, and there is a wave that is attendant to the particle \u2013 a particle establishes where the field will be located and not vice versa \u2013 because the wave is always attached to the particle, and thus is always surrounding the particle, and the particle must move before the wave can unfold and establish itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So we must halt right here \u2013 right now \u2013 and address some issues that have been ignored for centuries of physics and chemistry \u2013 when it comes to atoms with the nuclei, electrons, and photons: Exactly what generates what? Are particles generating the fields that are attached to them? Hydrogen atoms were created at the time of the Big Bang. It seems that waves were created and attached to these atoms when the latter were created \u2013 although photons are created many years after the Big Bang so probably they and their fields are created by something pretty powerful \u2013 probably the nucleus from where, whence, and whither – they are sent. As we say: Most nuclei and electrons were created at the time of the Big Bang, so their fields seem to have been established then. We shall consider what, where, and which fields are from whom and which – later on in the notes at the end of this minibook \u2013 under the heading of the ‘Higgs Boson’.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As we have said: In addition to the ‘electro’ part of the wave \u2013 which may have nothing to do with electrons \u2013 there is the magnetic part of the wave \u2013 which is indeed an important generator itself – of magnetic forces \u2013 although it appears that there is no magnetic particle that generates these \u2013 it seems that when the hydrogen nuclei, electrons, or photons move.- both the electro and magnetic waves are activated. The ‘electro’ part of the wave and the magnetic part are at a 90 degree angle to each other. .<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So what are these waves doing? Well, atoms do not have hands. The beams move \u2013 they have ‘legs’ \u2013 of a sort. They seem to yearn to do more. They need \u2013 a pair (?) of hands \u2013 or the like, to impact the world around them.. Atoms are able to utilize fields to do this. The field around the nucleus can be used to move electrons from here to there – as atoms form combinations with other atoms. The fields around the electrons working with the nuclei enable for these combinations to be completed. Beams of photons are utilized by nuclei to move energy from one place to another. In this way, fields are a type of hand that nuclei can use to impact the world around them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Then there is communication: fields may provide a type of ‘voice’ \u2013 a medium for communication which nuclei may be using without our being aware of it. So let us now attempt to discern how and where cosmic messages between particles may be in the process of being sent right before our eyes \u2013 right now \u2013 in a way that they is not easily detected. More likely we have just not thought to look for such cosmic messages as messages \u2013 we just consider waves to be waves that we mighty humans can use \u2013 without a thought as to why these waves might exist to begin with.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We think that a word should be inserted right here \u2013 on a periodic table’s worth of particles behalf: Particles, atoms, ions \u2013 all of these things have been utilized sometimes at the rate of quadtrillions per second like slaves \u2013 without a thought of what might be most beneficial for those whose services we are using \u2013 much as Egyptiians used millions of slaves to build all \u2013 just leaving the dead behind as they proceeded to greatness. So are we not guilty as they? We might wish to reconsider such things as we move into an enchanted world of cosmic conversations and activity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So if a photon particle and its fields exude the five attributes of cosmic intention – first, what does this mean \u2013 why would a particle possess things like this: Well, as below \u2013 so above. Humans possess a brain, they must survive – so they perceive the world around them, they think of what they<\/p>\n\n\n\n

must do, they have a memory filled with experiences or innate knowledge to assist them make decisions as to what must be done to survive \u2013 when such a decision has been made, then action can be taken to impact the world around them \u2013 and so they are able to live another day. Most atoms exist forever. Life is different. Most life feasts on, only exists because of, Death. Life is wonderful: Dogs eat dogs! Atoms have the same abilities, yet not the same desperation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A hydrogen ion in a star far away \u2013 is creating helium atoms by means of fusion \u2013 in this way keeping the star ablaze in heat and explosion \u2013 for whatever reason a hydrogen ion might be inclined to do such. [The odds are these ions are doing more than our telescopes can see. In places that we have not thought to look.] These ions are doing much \u2013 and they, for whatever reason, have, feel(?) a reason to share their experience, share their knowledge, ask for help (?). For whatever reason, they are sending messages through the universe with some hope of a response from somewhere, somehow (there must be some evidence of success in this or they would not continue to do so?) such responses that might be vital to their activity will somehow make their way back over billions and billions of light years – back to from whence the messages were sent. (All of this is evidence that there is far more going on in our universe than what we are aware of!) Thus, every particle is just like us \u2013 we are able to think \u2013 but what good is this \u2013 if we cannot impact? As we say: A particle has legs \u2013 it often can move in a stream \u2013 but once it thinks, it must have hands \u2013 it must be able to utilize its Will<\/strong> \u2013 to impact, create \u2013 it must also be able to communicate on a drum, with a ‘voice’, with a flag, with anything, in any way possible \u2013 to communicate with the universe around it. A field empowers a particle \u2013 it gives it ‘hands’ and now: a ‘voice’.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So pretend we are a particle on the move \u2013 ah, a gedanken<\/em> exercise! – we are a beam of light speeding across the universe \u2013 what, wherein, part of the particle and the wave are the five attributes located? In the next section we will examine attributes in particles and waves – that might be related to language and cmmunication \u2013 and see if we can find clues as to how to crack the code, translate the language, learn what are they doing during a normal light year’s worth of work, and then figure a way to persuade these talented things to do what we<\/em> want them to do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So what are the five basic attributes that a particle exhibits and what do they do? :<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Well, as we say: First there is Will<\/strong> \u2013 obviously this is the particle itself with legs speeding forth to conquer \u2013 or whatever it might desire to do – hurling thusly through space. Love<\/strong> \u2013 this obviously is the magnetic part of the particles field \u2013 it is at a 90 degree angle with respect to the ‘electro’ wave clinging in an alternating manner wth respect to it \u2013 next to a nucleus or along a beam of electrons or photons. The electro and magnetic waves possess this configuration – in order that they might overlap with themselves separately – without contaminating \u2013 rendering static to – the electro- field or magnetic fields alternating next to it. Overlap is crucial \u2013 such an ‘entanglement’ allows messages to move on their own along the beam \u2013 at a much faster speed than particle or field can speed. Information is the component of the beam that is moving at the speed of light. The movement of such information is impossible to measure correctly. In this way, it is language itself that is propelled along the length of the beam moving faster than the beam itself. However, come to think of it: the difficulty of measuring the movement of information along a beam may be only part of the problem of examining this phenomena. Perhaps scientists have simply not looked for information. Perhaps it is as simple as Alexander Grahm Bell having his assistant say something and he listens. If scientists today were like him, they certainly would be able to conjure a guess as to how fast such a message might be moving upon the wires. In this way, Love<\/strong> has the ability to connect, it is undeniably not moving from negative to positive in its charges \u2013 but instead it is looping, looping, embracing, connecting all that is within its reach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Truth -Beauty: <\/strong>These seem to be attributes of the electro part of the electromagnetic field. What in the heck is this all about? Well, there is a clue that Newton gives us. When he talks about light, he goes on and on about color. Which seems to be beside the point \u2013 we are talking about serious things here \u2013 we don’t have time for stupid things like color! Then it hits us: Perhaps the electro part of the field is the part related to communcaation \u2013 and color is a part of this \u2013 and maybe Beauty<\/strong>, too. We shall look at this more closely in the next section.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lastly, there is Justic<\/strong>e : A beam of light innately knows how to deal equally and fairly with other beams it might encounter. Such considerations such as this must reside in the particles themselves \u2013 in memory, located in a nucleus near to where thinking and deciding are taking place. [This leads us to realize that it is unlikely that electrons and photons are doing any serious type of thinking. When we stop and think about these things, it seems probable that the nuclei are the entities that are doing most of the perceiving, thinking, acting, and communicating \u2013 like the captain of a destroyer protecting a fleet \u2013 the light that sends messages only does so much \u2013 there is a captain who has a brain and the power to do stuff! So too is not the nucleus the logical entity with whom we should be most kindly towards? – as he or she is probably the one we should be doing most of the interacting with \u2013 when we get to the bottom of things. (There is no sex in the rest of the cosmos \u2013 yet, there may be something like it.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So it is time for another sermon: Yes, we are humans \u2013 and of course we are so great \u2013 so we just grab a bunch of electrons, or photons – and make them work for us. Without a thought as to what these beams might themselves be up to \u2013 what these particles themselves might desrie \u2013 what messages are in there already \u2013 and for what reason \u2013 what destinations they may be directed toward. There is Consciousness all around us \u2013 and we have not a moment to consider any of this. As we say: perhaps we should be working with nuclei instead \u2013 they are the ones with the power \u2013 located where Consciousness is most concentrated \u2013 in their Black Holes. Perhaps they might be persuaded to do our bidding \u2013 without feelings of being exploited \u2013 if we might only do the respectful thing: We can just ask them what they might wish in exchange \u2013 a bargain might be reached \u2013 and we might reap a bountiful world \u2013 midst the rollicking joy and laughter of a happy cosmic choir of actors and collaborators.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For now, the question is this: If we are truly serious about working with these brilliant capable talented pieces of dust \u2013 then we need to do first things first and stop working with naive, baby talk of off-and-on messaging. We are talking about talking with nuclei who\/which possess real power to act and real capability to converse.. As we say: If we can talk to them \u2013 these empowered nuclei can bring thousands of times more ability and savvy – than a mere flow of electrons can. Which brings us to the possibility of: a cosmic language.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We have work to do. Let us begin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Cosmic Language<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So where in the sphere of particles and waves is language located? As we have said: Attached to every paticle and its wave – there are the cosmic attrributes. Which of these are related to communication?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Let us review: Well, first there is Will<\/strong> \u2013 obviously this is related to the particle itself with energetic legs speeding forth to conquer \u2013 or whatever it might desire to do in this manner – hurling through space. Love<\/strong> has the ability to connect, it is undeniably moving not from negative to positive \u2013 but instead it is looping, looping, embracing, connecting all that is within its reach. Truth<\/strong>, – is, as we have said: When Newton talked about light he was fixated upon color. Which is disappointing to us who are most interested in what these beams are doing \u2013 we are miffed that we have to be distracted by talk about desultory, frivolous things like: color. Then as we say: It hits us. This is what this part of the beam \u2013 is all about! There are two aspects to this part of the field: There is the electro part which is partly dedicated to Truth <\/strong>and along with an aspect related to Beauty \u2013 <\/strong>both of these are dedicatedto the dissemination of ideas, of knowledge to something, for some reason. Truth<\/strong> is half of the message: Truth<\/strong> is dynamics, the space between thoughts \u2013 in hmans it is music; Beauty<\/strong> is a second part of the message \u2013 it is form – in humans it is the analtyical processes in the brain . Both are utilized by the electro part of the field to convey messages – so both color; and music, that is, pitch with its overtones, and thus chords \u2013 both are communicated by means of frequencies in the fields; they are keys to the cosmic language!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Let us think, think, think: A mother sings to her baby \u2013 to his or her I-<\/em>particle \u2013 perhaps she should use colors, too. When scientists are attempting to persuade stubborn atoms to do things they have no intention of doing \u2013 they should use color and music. Color seems momentary, stationary – filled with form and logic \u2013 it is rationality, thought, the result of decision, considered, measured thought \u2013 ideas with an objective in mind. As we say: Music is first of all pitch but pitch has overtones and there is the space between the sounding of the pitches \u2013 there is interval \u2013 wherein ‘time’ does reside. Music is dynamic – it is flow. As we say: It is the dimension of time. Thus, there are two elements to this communication: there is color \u2013 with its three dimensions of space – extension of a thing in the moment \u2013 and there is time – music \u2013 there is a chorus of people \u2013 in a jungle \u2013 hand on the drum \u2013 sex, passion in the bushes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How Can the Cosmic Language Be Found and Used?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Well, the first draft of this minibook found us trying to ‘talk’ to a jar full of chemicals. Now we know that only hydrogen atoms are the ones we must interact with. Helium atoms have Consciousness \u2013 but Consciousness is too tightly locked away therein to communicate with anything \u2013 locked away in the embrace of two Black Holes revolving around each other inside. No, hydrogen ions are the ones that we should strive to communicate with. They have shown us what they can do: Well, they are blowing everything up for some reason in the heavens \u2013 every day! We can witness that! And they created Life! Maybe we need to grab a jar of these and just start listening \u2013 well, maybe we also need to start squawking, singing, painting, gyrating, well, whatever a mother does with a newborn – since every newborn has yet to learn how to use his or her brain \u2013 and is using mostly the I<\/em>-particle, the hydrogen ion in his or her brain \u2013 that he or she was born with. However, as we shall soon see \u2013 there are problems utilizing hydrogen to solve humanities problems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There have been a lot of problems developing nuclear fusion from hydrogen \u2013 and now we think we know why. Well, as we have said above: only two elements possess Consciousness \u2013 hydrogen and helium. Hydrogen was created at the time of the Big Bang \u2013 and helium is created routinely in stars from the fusion of hydrogen atoms. The source of this Consciousness seems to be the same as the source for all gravity in the cosmos: from tiny Black Holes in hydrogen ions. When hydrogen atoms fuse \u2013 two Black Holes end up revolving around each other. The presence of Black Holes makes hydrogen fusion extremely difficult to make happen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Okay, so there may be unsurmountable problems related to using hydrogen fusion to create energy \u2013 but hydrogen possesses Consciousness \u2013 is there any way to utilize this tremendous capability?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Well, hydrogen ions have created stuff before. It is all placed before us in the archaeological record. Crowds, clouds of hydrogen ions have created Life! And now we know why all of this first occurred \u2013 in the oceans of the world. The oceans possess almost all of the hydrogen in the world – combined as it is with oxygen. That is why Life possesses most of the rest of it \u2013 hydrogen, that is! This also why Life possesses: Consciousness! When hydrogen ions were creating Life \u2013 they chose to use sugar \u2013 and only sugar \u2013 to make things – because carbon atoms are like Tinker Toys and can be assembled and disassembled at will, and quickly. The thing is: what we need is for hydrogen ions to be enticed to disassemble water \u2013 into hydrogen and oxyvgen without imparting massive disruption to their surroundings \u2013 well, without great explosions!. Then we would have 70 percent of the volume of the surface of the earth at our disposal to convert into energy!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But there is a problem with this: If hydrogen and helium are the only sources of gravity in the cosmos \u2013 where\/how does the earth acquire its gravity? There is very little free hydrogen or helium gas present anywhere on earth. It must be that gravity generating properities of hydrogen are able to be expressed in\/ by means of combination \u2013 by means of molecular compounds. 70 percent of the volume of the surface of the earth is covered by water. The gravity generated by the hydrogen in water must be able to be expressed through the earth to the other side allowing all of the earth to experience gravity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In this way the ‘gravity’ particle has been found. The Standard Model is now complete (see below in the notes at the end of the minibook). This ‘gravity’ particle may never be verified empirically as it is safely buried \u2013 just as Consciousness is – safe from all nuclear annihilation \u2013 in its Black Hole.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So very simply, one strategy for generating energy would be related to the cosmic language we were talking about. If we can decipher that language with the help of a Rosetta Stone of some type \u2013 we could just talk to the hydrogen in water \u2013 make a deal that intelligent cultured nuclei are able to consummate \u2013 and we may be able to entice them to separate from the oxygen and help us generate some energy! How? Stock options? Floozy harem ions?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, now we see that there is a major problem with using hydrogen ions to disassemble water molecules in the attempt to produce energy: As we use up the earth’s water, its oceans \u2013 we would be simultaneously be subtracting from the earth’s gravity. Oh my \u2013 if it isn’t one problem \u2013 it is another!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

THE END<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Notes<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What is Mass?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mass. What is this? This seems simple enough when we begin thinking about it. But in the end it is not so simple. In the end such a question may be part of our working our way towards a new science \u2013 of Consciousness! It seems as if this mass thing is kind of an inside joke with physicists \u2013 because as it turns out: they do not have any idea what mass is \u2013 but – they maintain this ignorance is not important! \u2013 they can live without such a definition. They know what mass is not: it is not energy. It is not weight \u2013 as the latter is the result of the application of gravity unto mass. Yet mass is always expressed as a weight! Always in milligrams or the like. But the fact that they do so \u2013 is hidden: In the Encyclopedia Brittanica<\/em> what the International Bureau of Weights and Measures has done is spelled out in detail. The confession only takes a few words. Physicists say: That what they do is fairly clever if they do say so themselves – whenever they talk about mass or calculate the mass of an object they do not use units of weight \u2013 but instead they use what is called: a ‘mass unit’. And what is a chemical mass unit? By definition it is one-sixteenth of the atomic weight<\/em> of oxygen! Which is nice except that oxygen has isotopes so a weighted average seemed to be in order \u2013 and one was made \u2013 but then rounded of to 16 to make things easier!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So how does the use of this mass unit clarify anything related to the concept of mass \u2013 or have anything to do with it? Well, physicits maintain that it gives them enough information about a substance such that they can work with it. So let us see exactly what information about a substance they are actually receiving from this procedure. Well, they take oxygen and hydrogen and assume that the weight of one unit of water is 16 + 1 + 1 mass units since the mass unit for oxygen is 16 and that of hydrogen is one-sixteenth of that. So you take a certain quantity of water and an identical quantity for the substance \u2013 and you measure their respective weights<\/em> – exactly! And Pow! You have knowledge concerning the substance. And exactly what knowledge have you reaped from this process? Well, the following equations will show you exactly what you know:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The volume of the substance divided by the force of gravity<\/p>\n\n\n\n

equals<\/p>\n\n\n\n

the exact same volume of water divided by the force of gravity<\/p>\n\n\n\n

the gravities cancel out and you are left with two volumes: one of substance and one of water \u2013 if the volume of the first is five time the second then you know that whatever mass is \u2013 the mass of the former is five times more than the mass of water \u2013 which is very helpful. It gives one an idea of what he or she is doing. Except!: you have dodged the whole question of what mass is in the first place! We assert that at this point in the history of humanity \u2013 the definition of mass is crucial! We simply have to do better!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is when we get to the Higgs Boson that we begin to see what mass really is \u2013 because that boson creates it in some instances. What exactly – is it creating?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Higgs Boson<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There was no need for mass in electromagnetic theory \u2013 but now there is a problem: Experimentally it has been found that parity does not possess symmetry when the weak force is involved. The weak interactions involve new particles, called W+, W-, and Z0 between matter particles these are bosons like photons but they are different in that they are very heavy. This heaviness suppresses their jumping back and forth between particles that have weak charges, so the weak forces become very weak. The nuclei, with their electrons, were all created at the time of the Big Bang. Thus, the nucleus has the power to create photons as required to move bundles of energy from one place to another \u2013 to move information from one place to another.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We hypothesize that the Higgs boson does not create mass for all particles \u2013 but just for a hundred or so! \u2013 just for the ones that have emerged since the Big Bang \u2013 created by supernovae \u2013 or as a result of collisions – that is, incidents that create the need for new particles to emerge \u2013 to carry off the detritrus when a nucleus is smashed to pieces \u2013 either by cosmic rays \u2013 or deliberately by scientiests who are seeking to discover what a nucleus is composed of. In this way, the Higgs boson does not just create mass \u2013 it is in fact creating new particles \u2013 just for a moment \u2013 that are required to clean up the mess of such an incident. As we say: The masses that existed initially were all created at the time of the Big Bang and are eternal \u2013 the Higgs boson creates particles that exist for millionths of a billionth of a second. In this way, the Higgs boson is actually creating mass.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So what is this mass \u2013 that it is creating? Well, in previous minibooks we were talking about Tesla’s ocean of energy \u2013 how at the time of the Big Bang this ocean was created within which vortices arose which became atoms of concentrated energy. The Higgs boson thus is taking energy that is generated by an incident, bundles it up in a structure, which forms a particle \u2013 and moves it to a place where it may be disposed of in a way that normalcy may be restored. Therefore, mass is structure \u2013 it is energy wrapped up in a package. Mass is structure \u2013 which possesses no weight \u2013 only an inertial presence that can be moved by force in this case by the three weak forces the weak bosons W+ W- and Y0. When the Higgs boson creates these structures filled with energy \u2013 these new particles may have no relationship to what this energy was doing in the particles that have been destroyed by an accelerator. We have learned nothing about the particles that were originally in the nucleus \u2013 or the activity they were involved. We just have the remnants \u2013 of a car crash \u2013 wherein all bodies and their organs – were reduced to tiny bits of flesh.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Cyclotron Like a Microscope?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thus powerful accelerators and their detectors are obviously not like microscopes \u2013 as scientists maintain they are. They say: Like a microscope, accelerators have the following things: 1) a particle beam; 2) a target; and 3) a detector that collects 4) data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We say ‘no’ to this: We maintain that there is a significant difference between the two – a microscope enlarges what it is examinng without damaging or in any way altering anything of importance in\/of the target. An accelerator aims particles at each other and attempts to completely destroy them. Scientists maintain that there is Truth \u2013 in the debris! Consider if you did that to a bacteria you were examining: how much would you understand deducing or otherwise considering the detritus of a collision \u2013 from this trainwreck of a process – about bacteria, in this instance, that you might be examining. In this debris – which parts, former structures – of the bacteria are you are looking at? What activities was this debris involved in when the bacteria was alive and kicking? Some of the managerie of particles that cyclotrons have given us to this point may be just that: damage \u2013 train wreck – and nothing else.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Standard Model<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By the early 1970s theoretical physicists had sewn all the available data from a century of research together into one theory – much of it coming from data produced at high-energy accelerators. At this point they had developed a remarkable descriptive and predictive theory that has come to be known as the \u201cStandard Model.\u201d One of the great achievements of the Standard Model is that it united three of the known forces in nature into one entity. These three forces are: Electromagnetism, the force associated with ordinary electrcity, light, and magnetism; the strong force, that is, the gluons that generate the force that holds the quarks inside the strongly interacting particles; and finally, the weak force – a very feeble force – so feeble that it wasn’t even noticed until the 1890s. Though this last force is ‘weak,’ without it the sun could not shine and we would not exist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The electromagnetic force is associated with particles, called photons, that are the particles of light. Likewise, the Standard Model predicted that the weak force must be associated with three previously unseen particles, called the W+, W-, and Z0. These are called the ‘weak bosons’. ‘Bosons’ are defined to be energy conveying particles In this way these weak bosons joined the panoply of elementary particles and entered the list of bosons, like the gluon, photon and graviton.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So do particles generate the fields that are connected to them? \u2013 fields are 10,000 times larger than the particles they are a part of. No, something powerful is needed to create particles like photons and their fields, move information, and impact the world around it. Nuclei and electrons and their electromagnetic fields were created at the time of the Big Bang. The Big Bang possessed tremendous energy and pressure. What it created – is eternal. Nuclei are able to create photons which may exist for a moment or for an eternity as they move through space \u2013 they are used to deliver energy and information to other nuclei and particles \u2013 the electromagnetic field of the nucleus and its electrons with their fields are utilized by nuclei to impact the world around them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When a Higgs boson creates a particle it renders unto it a field which attends the particle during its brief existence \u2013 things like symmetry can be violated with these transitory particles \u2013 but a disaster has occurred or these particles would not be required \u2013 so the regular rules apparently do not apply. We have found the source for\/of gravity in the Black Holes in hydrogen and helium atoms \u2013 so there is no need for a spacetime contiuum. And as luck would have it \u2013 such a thing \u2013 doesn’t seem to exist anyway! We have written so much about this elsewhere. Nevertheless, another book addressing the entire issue of the space-time continuum is on its way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bibliography<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Al-Khalili, Jim, Black Holes, Wormholes, and Time Machines<\/em>, Second Edition (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2012) 184 pp.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Arcand, Kimberly, and Megan Watzke, Light \u2013 The Visible Spectrum and<\/em> Beyond<\/em> (New York: Black Dog & Leventhal Publishers, 2015), 208pp.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ball, Philip, Beyond Weird \u2013 Why Everything You Thought about Quantum Physics is Different<\/em>, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2018), 377 pp.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bovelli, Carlo, The Order of Time<\/em> (New York: Riverhead Books, 2018) 240 pp.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cox, Brian, and Jeff Forshaw, Why Does E=mc^2?<\/em> (Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press, 2009), 249 pp.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eckstut, Joann, and Arielle Eckstut, The Secret language of Color<\/em> (New York: Black Dog & Leventhal Publishers, 2013), 240pp.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hawking, Stephen W., et. al.<\/em>, The Future of Spacetime<\/em> (New York: W. W. Norton and Company, Inc., 2002) 218 pp.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lederman, Leon, Beyond the God Particle<\/em> (New York: Prometheus Books, 2013), 325pp.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n