<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Minibook &#8211; CF Theater Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cftheater.info/blog/tag/minibook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cftheater.info/blog</link>
	<description>http://www.cftheater.info</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 16:23:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The I And The Cosmos: How We Can Increase the Power of Our AI by Millions of Millions of Times</title>
		<link>https://cftheater.info/blog/the-i-and-the-cosmos-how-we-can-increase-the-power-of-our-ai-by-millions-of-millions-of-times/</link>
					<comments>https://cftheater.info/blog/the-i-and-the-cosmos-how-we-can-increase-the-power-of-our-ai-by-millions-of-millions-of-times/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 16:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mini Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minibook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The I And The Cosmos: How We Can Increase the Power of Our AI by Millions of Millions of Times]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cftheater.info/blog/?p=1721</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By: Franks Andres Every particle possesses Consciousness. We are 99.9 percentcertain that this is the case: But we have no proof – so: People simplygo on with their Lives. We&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="has-text-align-center">By: Franks Andres</p>


<div class="wp-block-image is-style-rounded">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="467" height="350" src="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/artificial-intelligence-ai-business-people-showing-future-technology-photo.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-1722" srcset="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/artificial-intelligence-ai-business-people-showing-future-technology-photo.jpg 467w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/artificial-intelligence-ai-business-people-showing-future-technology-photo-300x225.jpg 300w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/artificial-intelligence-ai-business-people-showing-future-technology-photo-377x283.jpg 377w" sizes="(max-width: 467px) 100vw, 467px" /></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center has-medium-font-size">Every particle possesses Consciousness. We are 99.9 percent<br>certain that this is the case: But we have no proof – so: People simply<br>go on with their Lives. We mean: It would make a world of difference :<br>If this were True. It would explain so much. It would render a million of<br>millions additional heads – to get stuff done. And atoms utilize Dark<br>Energy! We mean: We don’t know where 97 percent of the Matter and<br>Energy in the Cosmos is: Particles with Consciousness -would begin to<br>answer questions about the Dark Side of the Cosmos!</p>



<p></p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-amazon wp-block-embed-amazon"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe title="The I And The Cosmos: How We Can Increase the Power of Our AI by Millions of Millions of Times" type="text/html" width="317" height="476" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen allow="clipboard-write" style="max-width:100%" src="https://read.amazon.com/kp/card?asin=B0GX2YF3FZ"></iframe>
</div></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://cftheater.info/blog/the-i-and-the-cosmos-how-we-can-increase-the-power-of-our-ai-by-millions-of-millions-of-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;I&#8221; And The Cosmos</title>
		<link>https://cftheater.info/blog/the-i-and-the-cosmos/</link>
					<comments>https://cftheater.info/blog/the-i-and-the-cosmos/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 11:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mini Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minibook]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cftheater.info/blog/?p=1685</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Every particle possesses Consciousness. We are 99.9 percentcertain that this is the case: But we have no proof – so: People simplygo on with their Lives. We mean: It would&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="644" height="1024" src="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/71SMPORP86L._SL1500_-644x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-1686" srcset="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/71SMPORP86L._SL1500_-644x1024.jpg 644w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/71SMPORP86L._SL1500_-189x300.jpg 189w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/71SMPORP86L._SL1500_-768x1222.jpg 768w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/71SMPORP86L._SL1500_.jpg 943w" sizes="(max-width: 644px) 100vw, 644px" /></figure>



<p class="has-medium-font-size">Every particle possesses Consciousness. We are 99.9 percent<br>certain that this is the case: But we have no proof – so: People simply<br>go on with their Lives. We mean: It would make a world of difference :<br>If this were True. It would explain so much. It would render a million of<br>millions additional heads – to get stuff done. And atoms utilize Dark<br>Energy! We mean: We don’t know where 97 percent of the Matter and<br>Energy in the Cosmos is: Particles with Consciousness -would begin to<br>answer questions about the Dark Side of the Cosmos!</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-amazon wp-block-embed-amazon"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="The &#034;I&#034; And The Cosmos" type="text/html" width="317" height="476" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen style="max-width:100%" src="https://read.amazon.com/kp/card?preview=inline&#038;linkCode=kpd&#038;ref_=k4w_oembed_08Fg9J61TCimMt&#038;asin=B0G4KM4TPY&#038;tag=kpembed-20"></iframe>
</div></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://cftheater.info/blog/the-i-and-the-cosmos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cancer Finally – A Strategy That Will Work</title>
		<link>https://cftheater.info/blog/cancer-finally-a-strategy-that-will-work/</link>
					<comments>https://cftheater.info/blog/cancer-finally-a-strategy-that-will-work/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mini Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minibook]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftheater.info/blog/?p=1596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CANCER Finally – A Strategy That Will Work. by Francis William Andres II and Frank W. Andres © Copyright Francis William Andres II, Frank W. Andres 2024. All Rights Reserved.&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image is-style-rounded">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="1024" src="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/cancer-icon-2797418_1280-1024x1024.png" alt="" class="wp-image-1597" style="width:658px;height:auto" srcset="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/cancer-icon-2797418_1280-1024x1024.png 1024w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/cancer-icon-2797418_1280-300x300.png 300w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/cancer-icon-2797418_1280-150x150.png 150w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/cancer-icon-2797418_1280-768x768.png 768w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/cancer-icon-2797418_1280.png 1280w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">CANCER</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Finally – A Strategy That Will Work.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">by</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Francis William Andres II</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">and</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Frank W. Andres</p>



<p>© Copyright Francis William Andres II, Frank W. Andres 2024.</p>



<p>All Rights Reserved.</p>



<p>Fire Mountain Publishing</p>



<p>4075 Vineyard Ave. Pleasanton, CA 9566</p>



<p>Please visit our website at http://www.cftheater.info</p>



<p>Please communicate with us via the following Email</p>



<p><a href="mailto:frankandres@MyYahoo.com">frankandres@MyYahoo.com</a>.</p>



<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>



<p>Things seem fairly straight-forward to us. Very simply our idea is this: Cancer is not a disease in the usual sense. In the usual sense: Disease is caused by some foreign agent. A virus or bacteria is attempting to kill a person. In the case of Cancer – our thesis is this:</p>



<p>When it comes to Cancer – there <strong>is</strong> a foreign agent – an <strong>embryo</strong>. One does not usually think of a baby as one’s enemy. A baby does have its own immune system. It must learn to distinguish between its body and the body of its mother and know which parts of the mother are compatible with its arc of development. There is a counterpart to this of course – which becomes quite interesting. A mother’s body becomes accustomed to an embryo – a foreign body existing within her. Perhaps part of the problems with finding a cure for cancer is related to the fact that a mother is induced by biological factors to tolerate aspects of such a foreign body residing within her and even support it with nutrients. This produces differences from a normal disease. And it simply calls for: A different strategy.</p>



<p>The crucial moment for us was when: One of us remembered seeing a drawing of a Cancerous glob of tissue in one of the references he had consulted some thirty years before. In that glob were drawn what an investigator had seen and a reader could not forget remembering: A mass of cells mangled and tangled. And in amongst that mass of monstrous destruction were certain identifiable objects: Hair, teeth, bones! Right then and there with that remembrance – one of us right now &#8211; saw the answer to the question: How can we cure this horrible disease? Well, this tangled mass was obviously a baby. A baby was attempting to grow where it had no business – or ability – to do so. This leads to a different strategy for a cure for Cancer. It leads to an obvious mantra &#8211; a chant to be intoned again and again: Simply <strong>Kill Kill Kill!</strong></p>



<p>In this minibook we are using the word ‘embryo’ in a broad sense:. The single-cell organism resulting from a fertilized egg is a zygote. When the zygote divides to become a collection of cells that can implant in the wall of the uterus, it first moves down a fallopian tube for about a week &#8211; during which time it becomes a monula, and then a blastocyst. About four seeks later, after the development of an amniotic sac, it becomes an embryo. Ater eleven weeks, it is usually referred to as a fetus.</p>



<p><strong>Cancer as Polio</strong></p>



<p>A History of Failure</p>



<p>OK: So up to this point in history Cancer has been seen to be simply: A disease. It has been simply a question of: Which vaccine is to be developed. Well, one cannot blame therapists and doctors for attempting to fight Cancer in the way they have done – in the past: In most cases – for most disease &#8211; a vaccine does – the job. A vaccine is created by using the disease itself. If it is polio – the virus that infects one with polio is captured and killed. These dead cells are then used in the vaccine to cure the disease. These dead entities when injected into one – stirs his or her immune system to action. The dead cells alert the system as to which pathogen to look for When such pathogen is found – the vaccine has a poison that kills it.</p>



<p>Vaccines have been used for a long time. Cancer research using them started in earnest around 1980. There was virtually no success using them against Cancer until around 1990. And even then progress was questionable. In the 1990s a strategy involved monoclonal antibodies was developed. This strategy utilized tiny man-made instruments. These man-made antibodies &#8211; each one could identify a specific antigen or pathogen – with its upper part &#8211; and then it had the equivalent of a poison in the lower part to dispatch the culprit. This strategy was pursued until around the year 2000 – when it was discontinued – with little total success.</p>



<p>Vaccines using RNA</p>



<p>The human genome was delineated in the year 2000. Scientists could use their knowledge concerning Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) now. Many of these scientists decided to work with Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) instead. RNA would seem to be like a sister to the more Powerful DNA. The Truth is: RNA came first on the ladder of evolution. It appears to have held the first form of Life! RNA can be snipped up and used to do things without damaging the original template: DNA. It is simply safer to use. Also it is the molecule that gets things done: Its job for the three plus billion years after its appearance – has been to duplicate portions of DNA and put them to work making proteins that are needed for a cell to Live.</p>



<p>So: We know what typical vaccines do. Please see above. Well: Vaccines using RNA in effect are doing exactly the same thing &#8211; pursuing exactly the same strategy &#8211; that is pursued using the usual vaccines. It is also sort of trying to duplicate what was done with monoclonal antibodies. It is forming/ creating the equivalent to antibodies to combat foreign agents that have entered a person’s body. It is just that RNA can be used to augment an antibodies’ Power and longevity.</p>



<p>In March of 2020, COVID was shutting down universities and other establishments. There was evidence that protocols using the usual antibody vaccine route were not working effectively against this disease. Fortunately a gene-editing tool called CRISPR – part of a RNA enzyme editing- protocol &#8211; which was developed in 2012 was at hand to be used in an experimental way to help battle the disease. In this way a tool that was developed partially for the fight against Cancer could gain some challenges and indeed some improvements from its use in this new battle against a formidable pathogen.</p>



<p>So: The historical use of vaccines is based on techniques that were found essentially through the process of trial and error. As we say: The important date now was the year 2000 when the human genome was fully delineated. This string of code contains all the secrets of Life. As we say: Some scientists initially were focusing on the DNA itself and unraveling its mysteries. As we say: Others were looking at its sister – actually in terms of evolution as it is vaguely reconstructed for the cell – RNA was DNA’s mother – as RNA existed before DNA &#8211; and actually may have represented the first: Life! This second nation-wide collection of scientists were looking at RNA.</p>



<p>It turns out that bacteria were using RNA &#8211; billions of years ago &#8211; to fight their perenniel foe: Viruses. Scientists now were understanding the totality of what these nuclear molecules could do. First, they could be used to fight disease &#8211; as bacteria have done for billions of years. They can seek out viruses, enter them, find their genomes and use RNA to slice genes to pieces. Some scientists saw another possibility. They could use RNA in human cells. Changes could be made to human DNA, repair damage caused by mutations, perhaps add genes that can do things – all of which opened the possibility of entirely new Lives for human beings &#8211; free from disease – full of vibrant Health! In all this there also arose: Caution. Fighting Disease is one thing. Enhancing – changing human beings genetically – physiologically – in ways that can be inherited &#8211; is fraught with ethical conundrums.</p>



<p>Still – when it came to disease: There was a new tool: RNA. However, the same basic therapy – the therapy that was initially used against Polio &#8211; was still in place. A pathogen was identified and action was taken to disarm the threat. Several variations to this theme had been tried by the year 2010 – and nothing seemed to be working – in the fight &#8211; against Cancer.</p>



<p>What in the Heck <strong>is –</strong> Cancer?</p>



<p>Our hypothesis is: Cancer is the making of an embryo! It is simply is being done &#8211; in the wrong place. This is the result of a mutation in a gene. This mutation of a gene takes place in a genome of a cell that is in no way prepared to support the growth of a baby. The cell in question may be in one’s arm. So: In a way – Cancer does indeed involve the invasion of a human body with a foreign agent. However, this foreign agent does not have the intent to harm its host. In fact both agent and host suddenly are persuaded to start participating in a cascade of physiological and biological events that usually climax with the birth of a baby. In this case things go wrong. Very very Wrong.</p>



<p>There are differences of course – in the course natural embryonic development versus what occurs with a Cancerous growth. If this is a normal pregnancy we are talking about: Doctors do one set of things.</p>



<p>When it comes to Cancer – doctors simply must work differently. With Cancer: We simply are not polite. We are not pussy-footing around. We are simply: Out to . <strong>Kill</strong> . And <strong>Kill</strong> &#8211; for Good!</p>



<p>Normal Embryological Development</p>



<p>Let us review what happens it the first days of a normal embryonic development. An egg is fertilized by a sperm. This creates the first cell that will eventually become a child. The child has a genome and the mother a different one. The development of the embryo is driven by the genome in the embryo. The genome in the mother acts in a reactive – responsive way – it is induced to support this development</p>



<p>When comparing normal embryologic development with its Cancerous counterpart – the most similarities occur during the first days of development. During the first five days the fertilized egg becomes a zygote. During this stage the zygote divides five to six times. At the end of that time: The zygote becomes a monula. This monula then moves for about three days through a fallopian tube &#8211; to the uterus where it becomes a blastocyst. In this way: For three or four days this original cell divides three or four times until it consists of 16 or 32 new cells. At this point: This cluster of cells attaches itself to the lining of the uterus.</p>



<p>Up to this point: the development of a normal embryo and one that will erupt into Cancer are probably very similar.</p>



<p>Cancerous Embryonic Development</p>



<p>So: As we say &#8211; Cancer begins with the fact that an embryo is simply not a part of one’s body. It is – actually an intruder of sorts. One does not think of a baby as an enemy. Yet a baby possesses an immune system of its own. It must be able to distinguish its body from that of its mother. This is not necessary to stress – but Life was created by Hydrogen ions working together in a primeval ocean. The real secret to their success was the creation of a map in atoms &#8211; in which was inscribed the ability for Life to be: Well – aLive! And then to be able to reproduce.</p>



<p>It is the reproduction part that we are concerned with here.</p>



<p>When we talk about Cancer and embryonic development – things get a bit confusing here. This confusion is part of the difficulty that leads to Cancer. As we say: An embryo is a foreign body developing within a ‘mother’s’ body. The fact is: This may not be a mother at all. This can occur in any human being at any time at any place in his or her body. Well: Every cell in a person’s body possesses the same genome. This means that if one selects a cell in your arm and examines it closely – it possesses a genome. And then you realize: The genome in this particular cell is exactly identical to the genome that created you &#8211; in the first moments of your existence. This genome &#8211; located in your left arm – is identical to the genome – that created your embryo – at the very beginning.</p>



<p>At the very beginning: An egg is fertilized to form the first cell of an embryo to be. This fertilization initiates a cascade of embryonic development. In the situation for Cancer: A mutation in a genome of a cell in say one’s arm – initiates this same cascade of physiological development. This time: In the wrong place.</p>



<p>As we say: There are probably only slight differences between what a Cancerous zygote experiences and what a normal zygote experiences &#8211; during the first week of embryotic development. After that duration: We can expect wildly different development. When we zero in on the development of a Cancer cell – we can see that divergences from normalcy begin at the point when the embryo is supposed to attach itself to a mother’s uterus. That cell in one’s arm is not naturally primed to divide – rapidly and continually in the way an embryo is. The cell in one’s arm has its own work to do and this work is now is being pe-empted by embryonic behavior.</p>



<p>So: A mutation has occurred in a cell in one’s arm. This cell will now experience a cascade of activities prescribed by the genome that this cell and all subsequent cells that are generated – share. There is the cluster of cells that are generated from the arm cell turned into ‘embryonic’ cell. Then there are the cells surrounding this cluster. Well, these cells share the same genome as the ‘embryonic’ cells – but there is no mutation within them turning on a ‘mother’s’ automatic response to this embryonic cascade that is going on in the embryonic cluster of cells. Thus after the first week – the ‘embryo’ is pretty much on it own. It is a growing embryo in an environment that is foreign to it and is not supportive of it – in any way.</p>



<p>So: The Cancer embryonic cell is dividing!!! Rapidly. As we say: This is crazy for a normal cell – in one;s arm! So when a scientist is looking for first signs of Cancer – he or she may see first &#8211; signs of cell disfunction. Whatever the cell’s original work was – this work is now being curtailed.</p>



<p>Now in all of this: Our first objective is &#8211; to catch things before they spread. Spread from what? Not spread from one cell. This embryonic cell in one’s arm &#8211; now becomes a sort of moving target. One cell become 16 maybe 32 – in just a matter of a week. It is this cluster of cells that now resides in one’s arm that must be detected and dealt with as soon as possible. But this remains principally conceptually the same as: Deviations from one cell’s behavior at this point. Technically: Cancer has not spread yet.</p>



<p>When a baby is in cells in our arm &#8211; it is a problem. So there are two genomes in a normal situation – there is a genome in the embryo in the uterus – and the genome in the uterus itself . The embryo is a foreign agent that a mother’s genome has to be induced in a complicated manner to at first tolerate and then support. But in the case of Cancer: There actually is only one genome – there are two identical genomes – one in the cells of the embryo and one in the cells of the arm. This is probably the reason that the Cancer is not immediately aborted. All is compatible. All seems in a sense to be fine. Even though things are drastically wrong! One’s arm is simply trying to build or it is allowing to be built &#8211; a clone of the individual who is suffering from this Cancer.</p>



<p>After a week this cluster of cells is too small to be detected easily. Cancer must spread before any distinct signs will appear. Unfortunately &#8211; at that time – when Cancer is spreading: Cancer is well on its way. We must devise a way – to identify the presence of Cancer – early.</p>



<p>An embryo is basically assembling itself using the DNA in the cells that are dividing. The embryo is relying on cues – physiological cues &#8211; that it obtains from the environment around it. The cues that the embryo receives from a uterus are vastly different from cues that an embryo receives from one’s left arm. These differences are crucial to our strategy for a cure. These differences lead us to one conclusion – seldom pronounced during the present time to deal with Cancer. Our mantra is simply<strong>: Kill</strong> Cancer. <strong>Kill</strong> Cancer.</p>



<p><strong>Towards a Successful Strategy</strong></p>



<p>Cancer in the Embryonic Stage</p>



<p>So – we can see: After about a week &#8211; the development of Cancer must pause. It has gone through roughly a week of cell division. It continues to divide – but now it is looking for physiological cues that it would normally receive if it were actually attaching itself to the lining of one’s uterus. Physiological cues that a embryo would receive from all directions at this point – are simply – not forthcoming. Because of this – development of this Cancer embryo – just stops. This can give us some time to react – and <strong>Kill.</strong></p>



<p>So how can we use this precious time? We shall only have two or three weeks in which to work quickly. Well, we need something like a equivalency to a colonoscopy. And we need to do a thing like this for everyone – every month! Cancer can start in anyone – at any time. And in every case we need to stop it Bang!! In its first month. Everything is very very tiny at this point in time. There is little physical indication of deviations from the norm. There is no pain. What we need is a test. It needs to be one &#8211; that can be used monthly and not be a burden to anyone.</p>



<p>Well, one idea comes immediately to mind: A sort of pregnancy test. It could even be developed such that it could give results for a real pregnancy as well as tell if one is with or free of Cancer. If the test discovers evidence of embryological biological behavior: You are pregnant! If the test finds evidence of such behavior and also discerns the existence a protein or two related to Cancer – then sorry – you have an embryo – growing &#8211; in your arm!</p>



<p>So one possibility of action that could be taken every month is &#8211; like a normal pregnancy test that is taken by both sexes. This could be made more palatable – by being a saliva test.</p>



<p>When results are positive for Cancer – then patient and doctor must act and react immediately. But there are as yet no overt signs of Cancer. OK: A person has Cancer. Where are these almost invisible cells located? They could be anywhere throughout the body. Anywhere! At this point personal family histories must be scrutinized. Which sort of Cancer is this person susceptible genetically to/with? Armed with this information: Tests should be performed immediately -that are usually not performed until very late – too late &#8211; in the game. When physical evidence reveals the location of an embryo growing in one’s arm: Well, <strong>Kill!</strong></p>



<p>Every doctor is now aware &#8211; that every genome possesses a <strong>Kill </strong>gene. Once the general area in which the tiny Cancer bundle resides is located – an injection should be made – with that <strong>Kill </strong>gene in mind. The location of cancerous cells can be zeroed in on more accurately by the identification of markers in cells. For example when an embryo is unable to attach itself to a uterus: It is unable to create an amniotic sac &#8211; which will become a placenta in which to continue growing in a normal manner. A placenta is one thing that is always a part of a baby and is not a part of the mother. The embryo will attempt drastic measures to create such a biological envelope. When it fails there may be evidence of that failure: Pieces of placental fragments in and around the embryonic cells. When such fragments are identified in and around a cluster of cells – these cells must simply be <strong>Killed</strong>. This is the equivalent of radiation treatment but practiced much earlier &#8211; in much a more exacting fashion.</p>



<p>Cancer Later On</p>



<p>The above is a proposal for a therapy that can work when Cancer is caught in the first month. We need a theory for later on – in cases wherein Cancer is allowed to develop &#8211; when a small bump is found. Well, generally speaking the same approach that practiced today &#8211; should be taken. If the Cancer is still in one lump it has not yet spread &#8211; hopefully an injection can be made with the same <strong>Kill </strong>objective in mind. This can be supplemented with the usual therapies that are used when a lump is found – In case a few Cancerous cells are missed.</p>



<p>Finally we need a therapy when Cancer is spread and is rampant. Well, the same desperate measures that are now used are called for here. But supplemented with repeated attempts to <strong>Kill Kill Kill !!!!!!</strong> using those always present and extremely effective<strong> Kill </strong>genes.</p>



<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>



<p>Cancer has been an affliction that has been able to avoid all efforts to identify and eradicate it. We think this is because the True nature of the affliction has not been recognized. Cancer is not a typical virus affliction toward which all existing therapies are now directed. Instead: It is the appearance of a very normal physiological process occurring in a very abnormal physiological place. Cancer is the not result of an outside intruder attempting to kill a person. Instead it is a very normal set of genetically programmed steps in a biologically normal development &#8211; that is simply occurring in the wrong place. This is due to a mutation which has caused a cascade of biological steps to take place in the wrong physiological setting. A successful strategy is just simply: <strong>Kill Kill Kill !!!</strong> Cancer. Well, the aim of our proposal for a therapy is: Not to pussy-foot around – not merely sit around and attack pathogens &#8211; splice this or dice that. As we I say: This strategy has one aim: To <strong>Kill</strong> Cancer cells. And the simple fact is: This <strong>Killing</strong> is easy. Every human cell possesses a <strong>Kill</strong> gene. It is surprising that this gene is not activated routinely &#8211; early in the game. The fact is: it isn’t. So our strategy becomes simply: Identify which proteins are products of Cancerous action, find cells that possess such proteins in their output. And then simply <strong>Kill</strong> those cells. One by One.</p>



<p>The trick is: In its earliest stages Cancer does not exhibit Cancerous type of markers, proteins , hormones, or molecules. Cancer at this state is simply an embryonic phenomenon. It is one – that simply must be identified to be happening – then be stopped – Now!!!</p>



<p>It should be noted that the embryo developing in one’s arm was never a normal zygote. There was never an egg which was fertilized. Therefore it will never possess anything like a normal Consciousness. It will never develop into anything resembling a normal Living – sentient &#8211; Being. It shall always remain simply a mass of cells – programmed to divide and divide until the human which is its host is finally dead. So one must not have qualms about <strong>Killing</strong> what might be some sort of baby. This is indeed a monster we are talking about. But it possesses no Consciousness. It is a some sort of zombie disaster. Treatment is simple and straight-forward. One must simply identity Cancerous cells. And then: <strong>Kill.</strong> This is indeed &#8211; a Fight – to the End!</p>



<p><strong>Kill. Kill. Kill.</strong></p>



<p><strong>THE END</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-amazon wp-block-embed-amazon"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Cancer - A Strategy That Will Really Work!" type="text/html" width="317" height="476" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen style="max-width:100%" src="https://read.amazon.com/kp/card?preview=inline&#038;linkCode=kpd&#038;ref_=k4w_oembed_biyAQXAoE3iT2v&#038;asin=B0DMPFZGQX&#038;tag=kpembed-20"></iframe>
</div></figure>



<p><strong>Bibliography</strong></p>



<p>Cuomo, Margaret I., <em>A World Without Cancer – The Making of a New</em></p>



<p><em>Cure and the Real Promise of Prevention </em>(New York: Rodale,</p>



<p>2012), 284 pp.</p>



<p>Graeber, Charles<strong>, </strong><em>The Breakthrough – Immunotherapy and the Race to</em></p>



<p><em>Cure Cancer </em>(New York: Twelve – Hachette Book Group, 2018),</p>



<p>302 pp.</p>



<p>Isaacson, Walter, <em>The Code Breaker – Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing,</em></p>



<p><em>and the Future of the Human Race </em>(New York: Simon &amp; Schuster,</p>



<p>2021), 533 pp.</p>



<p>MacAdam Donald, <em>Spontaneous Regression – Cancer and the Immune</em></p>



<p><em>System </em>(New York: Xlibris Corporation, 2003), 160 pp.</p>



<p>Myers, Amy, <em>The Autoimmune Solution – Prevent and Reverse the Full</em></p>



<p><em>Spectrum of Inflammatory Symptoms and Diseases </em>(New York:</p>



<p>Harper One, 2015), 389 pp.</p>



<p>Turner, Kelly A., <em>Radical Remission – Surviving Cancer Against All Odds –</em></p>



<p><em>The Nine Key Factors That Can Make a Real Difference </em>(New York:</p>



<p>Harper One, 2014), 312 pp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://cftheater.info/blog/cancer-finally-a-strategy-that-will-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Big Bang- A Fresh Approach</title>
		<link>https://cftheater.info/blog/the-big-bang-a-fresh-approach/</link>
					<comments>https://cftheater.info/blog/the-big-bang-a-fresh-approach/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mini Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minibook]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftheater.info/blog/?p=1586</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[THE BIG BANG A Fresh Approach by Frank W. Andres © Copyright Frank W. Andres 2024. All right Reserved. Fire Mountain Publishing 4075 Vineyard Ave. Pleasanton, CA 9566 Please visit&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="has-text-align-center">THE BIG BANG</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">A Fresh Approach</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-style-rounded"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="682" src="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/abstract-5286683_1280-1024x682.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-1587" srcset="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/abstract-5286683_1280-1024x682.jpg 1024w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/abstract-5286683_1280-300x200.jpg 300w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/abstract-5286683_1280-768x512.jpg 768w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/abstract-5286683_1280.jpg 1280w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>



<p class="has-text-align-center">by</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Frank W. Andres</p>



<p>© Copyright Frank W. Andres 2024. All right Reserved.</p>



<p>Fire Mountain Publishing</p>



<p>4075 Vineyard Ave. Pleasanton, CA 9566</p>



<p>Please visit our website at<a href=" http://www.cftheater.info"> http://www.cftheater.info</a></p>



<p>Please communicate with us via the following Email</p>



<p><a href="mailto:frankandres@MyYahoo.com">frankandres@MyYahoo.com</a>.</p>



<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>



<p>Building a New Quantum Theory</p>



<p>We have come up with a new conception for how the universe was formed. In the Process of doing this – we feel we have found the Source of Consciousness. The Source of Gravity. We have found the Source of Dark Matter and Dark Energy. We have come up with an entirely new theory of quantum mechanics. Now finally &#8211; we feel: We are in position to zero in on possible new Sources of Energy for a world that has only a few days left of oil. All of this is exciting. Let us begin!</p>



<p>When it comes to building a new quantum theory – we think one must begin – at the beginning: The Big Bang. That was when things were simple. The usual Big Bang story is that something exploded. Explosions are like fireworks they blow out in all directions. But there are two problems with this hypothesis: First &#8211; the universe was composed of a soup. It was too thick to explode. Second &#8211; it was flat. It was more like a flair from a large invisible body &#8211; like a gargantuan Sun -or something. It was flat so there was and still is blank blackness &#8211; above and beneath – places where lots of things might be going on – in Darkness. This is a tantalizing sentence – its implications left for future minibooks. At first this soup possessed the Energy of billions and trillions of nuclear bombs per square inch. It was a universal firestorm &#8211; with nowhere to go.</p>



<p>So: Initially – things were incredibly hot. There was incredible Pressure. There was only Energy. Then in micro-fractions of a second &#8211; a hot roiling, soup formed droplets of Energy – which with the aid of the Higgs boson and field – Energy became packaged into particles &#8211; Energy became a new consistency of soup – full of elementary particles: quarks, anti-quarks, gluons, and electrons. .In this first initial micro-second of space and time something else appeared – which are essential to our quantum mechanical story: Countless numbers of tiny Black Holes. Particles : Quarks, anti-Quarks, gluons, and electrons formed first. Matter had to exist before they could be sucked up into tiny dots of Gravity. It was at this moment we hypothesize that a universe filled with tiny Black Holes that were Created at the very beginning began to consume many of these newly packaged particles.. These particles were caught up, compacted, squeezed to the size of the Cosmic minimum – Planck’s constant. Tiny galaxies of particles were suck up – into countless tiny Black Holes. After a while: Heat and pressure dropped a bit and these tiny Black Holes stopped sucking up particles. We hypothesize that it was at this time that particles – quarks, anti-quarks and gluons were packaged by the Higgs boson and field to create new particles that were too large for the tiny Black Holes to consume.</p>



<p>When the quarks, anti-quarks, gluons, and electrons that had not been sucked up into those tiny Black Holes &#8211; were unable to spread any further despite the ever-growing universe, a phase transition occurred. The Cosmic liquid began to congeal into droplets, each one trapping clusters of quarks, anti-quarks, gluons, along with the tiny Black Holes inside, not electrons or photons – they were not susceptable to the Strong Force. The quarks, anti-quarks and gluons seem to have nestled next to Black Holes – because of Gravitational attraction of the Blackholes? – for Cosmic sort of protection? There were three quarks, three anti-quarks, and gluons along with a Black Hole in each droplet. These new particles would eventually become nuclei of hydrogen atoms. As we have said: Several kinds of particles were left outside of these new particles – Photons, electrons, and a few other particles. In the end, only two types of droplets remained: Protons and neutrons. In one moment quarks and gluons suddenly found themselves trapped forever. Once the typical distance between particles became the size of protons the strong nuclear forces between quarks stopped weakening and refused to relax their grip. As we said &#8211; in the end, only two types of droplets remained: Protons and neutrons – each with a tiny Black Hole at its center. As we say: Protons and neutrons in this way found their way into what would become proto-nuclei &#8211; for what would eventually become Hydrogen atoms. After atomic nuclei and electrons had traveled the universe separately for 380,000 years – they began combining to form atoms.</p>



<p>Now trapped forever inside these droplets: Quarks, anti-quarks and gluons still dash around at speeds at or near the speed of Llght, colliding again and again. The bedlam of the Big Bang is caught within &#8211; never to escape or fade away. At the center of this bedlam was always – hidden – a tiny Black Hole. The Energy in our bodies and in all ordinary things is a tiny remnant of the past, a memory of the universe’s violent birth. How much of this was hidden – remains hidden to this day – in the almost infinite recesses – of those tiny – Black Holes?</p>



<p>Protons possessed fields which allowed them to communicate with other protons with their fields.. Communication was nice – even necessary. But an electron allowed – Impact! The bundle that was a proton &#8211; now could exert Force upon the World around it. The proton bundle possessed a charge – the electron an opposite charge. With charge came the Force that made Impact possible – using another particle of Energy – the photon.</p>



<p>With this model of conjecture concerning the first seconds of the Big Bang – we now can start to build – a new theory of quantum mechanics.</p>



<p>Physics and the Right Side of the Brain</p>



<p>Right hemispheric dominant &#8211; Inductive science is different from left hemispheric science. The left side of the Brain supposedly is so very careful to make certain that hypotheses are verified experimentally. Until they aren’t. Relativity is supposedly backed up with all sorts of proof experimentally. String theory and multiverses are frankly admitted to be logical mathematical constructs. There is little empirical backing for much of the recent work that has been done in physics.</p>



<p>The right side of the Brain works differently. First &#8211; it is incapable of any deduction. Its Power is to build syntheses. So a hypothesis is not entertained unless it is the product of a least three different disciplines. And then there is one further necessity: All ideas must fit into one Grand Synthesis – that one inductive person is building in his or her Brain</p>



<p>Physicists are using mathematics – literally tons of it &#8211; to investigate physical concepts. But that is only half of a Brain. Our half will now start working. It must do as much work conceptually as those guys and gals do with mathematical equations. We shall not be using mathematics at all. Our job is partly to translate all that mathematics of physicists into concepts – which we then can process in an inductive manner – in a synthesizing manner – utilizing 12 different disciplines. Right now money is running out to finance new particle colliders. We can bring voluminous knowledge to bear – by simply calling upon information gleaned from all the disciplines in the curriculum.</p>



<p>The I and the Human Body</p>



<p>The human body is our laboratory! We are able to conduct bonified experiments – merely through the process of – ‘looking out.’ We are ninety-nine percent certain that there is a Hydrogen ion in charge of your body. We are ninety-nine percent certain that all particles possess Consciousness. That Hydrogen ion in charge of your body is your <em>I. </em>We think that Hydrogen will be very important to the Future of the world. There is a Hydrogen ion ‘looking out’ from your Brain. We can learn a whole lot about Hydrogen – this Powerful potentially important atom – simply by examining our own <em>I</em>. How does this <em>I.</em> communicate with &#8211; interact with the human body?</p>



<p>All perception in the Brain &#8211; is funneled towards this <em>I .</em> Descartes was aware of this. He hypothesized that this site of Consciousness was located in the Pineal area of the Brain. We have investigated this hypothesis: It appears to have great promise. The Pineal area is a vacant area. All sorts of neural conduits seem to be converging at exactly that site.</p>



<p>We have described how information is moved within the human brain before. We shall review what we know right here – right now</p>



<p>It appears that every neuron in the human brain is used in ways that take an apparatus made for and used in different ways in the past – these ways have been superseded by processes that are designed with one goal in mind: to speed information from perception areas to the center of Consciousness as fast as possible.</p>



<p>We are reading a book from the library by Matt Strassler entitled: <em>Waves in an Impossible Sea – How Everyday Life Emerges from the Cosmic Ocean. </em>This book has helped us develop an entire theory of waves now and how when they become ‘entangled’ – they actually are just overlapped – and move information from one point to another without the waves moving. This happens right now with guitars, for example. But we hypothesize that this is how information is moved in the Brain.</p>



<p>All particles have fields that are attached to them. When fields attached to different particles overlap: They become ‘entangled’ – and information can then be moved from one particle field to the other. This occurs regularly with phenomena that we are aware of. A guitar: A hand strums a guitar string – vibrations are moved in a wave. Molecules of air are vibrated. Vibrations in the air hit an ear drum. Information that is Imprinted in waves in air – is transferred to induce vibrations in the ear drum. All these waves are entangled and information is moved through fields one field to the next. If electricity is involved in these perceptual processes &#8211; it is not to use/convey information. That would restrict messages to mere on and off signals which obviously would be inadequate to move massive amounts of perceptual information in microseconds of Time. If charge is involved it is used to attract information from its source in perceptional areas to the Hydrogen ion in charge. Electrons are simply not moving in perceptual neurons. Information is.</p>



<p>We hypothesize how the neurons in the human Brain work. It is noteworthy how quickly information moves within the Brain. There are billions of neurons. However it appears that vast distances in the Brain &#8211; are ‘jumped’ in microseconds – as if there were Freeways that are not constricted by local routes. Here we are talking about information moving from perceptual areas of the Brain directly to the <em>I .</em></p>



<p>The activation and control of muscles in the body seem to be controlled more in an ‘electrical’ manner – on and off. However when it comes to perception – it is obvious that more than on and off is involved. There is the fact of the volumes of information that is moved. Second there is the fact of the speed involved. Both together cry out for an explanation of such a phenomenon.</p>



<p>So: The seat of Consciousness for a human is located in the Pineal area of the Brain. All sensory information is speeded to this destination. In any given length of neuron there is a stretch between nuclei of the neurons. These nuclei seem not to be involved in this movement of information at all. In any given segment of the neuron – in cross -section there is the center of the neuron where sodium and calcium ions have space to move. Particles must move before a field connected to them is allowed to spread out. In this case the fields spread from the center of the neuron towards the edge. Right next to the edge – the wall &#8211; of the neuron – there is a small interstix – a small space – in which waves – fields may move into this tiny space – but ions are kept out. In providing this small space – the neuron has fashioned a sort of neural Freeway – through which corridor – information is able to speed from perceptual center – to the <em>I .</em></p>



<p>Fields are dilute films of Consciousness – which are suitable only for movement of messages and instructions from one particle to the field of another particle. In the case of the neuron – only the field is utilized. Messages, instructions, well, actually – perceptual information is moved in volumes speedily by means of this Freeway composed entirely of fields – with particles in the perceptual areas at the beginning of this transmission &#8211; sending the information in this case – not the particles within the neurons along the routes. The fields within the tiny corridors along the walls of the neurons are overlapped. Information moves – nothing else &#8211; within this corridor.</p>



<p>We are calling this overlapping of fields and consequent transmission of information: Entanglement. There is supposedly evidence – well, one experiment – that indicates that particles are able to transmit and receive information over long distances. This is what physicists are talking about when they refer to the word: Entanglement. Without entering that argument – we would only proffer our hypothesis that our conception of ‘Entanglement’ occurs all the time as part of the routine carrying our of business – among particles.</p>



<p><strong>Some New Ideas</strong></p>



<p>Hydrogen – The Miracle Atom</p>



<p>Hydrogen atoms are very important to this minibook. We hypothesize that they are Theee Gravity particle. We also hypothesize that each possesses a Black Hole &#8211; which means that each Hydrogen atom possesses a tremendous amount of potential Power. Well, we have first-hand knowledge about Hydrogen atoms. There is a Hydrogen ion in charge of our Brain – in charge of our human body. Thus we can learn a lot – just from examining one thing. Our <em>I !!</em></p>



<p>The main fact that is driving most of the breakthroughs in our minibook here &#8211; are related to one of our hypotheses: The existence in every Hydrogen atom – of a Black Hole. First we have to work through some other ideas.</p>



<p>We should acknowledge right here right now – that our number one goal in doing all this thinking is simply this: There are only so many days of oil left. We need new sources of Energy. It is likely that some solutions will involve Hydrogen. It is the source of all Light. It also has a Black Hole. It is the source of Gravity. These things must be established by induction not deduction – as the latter is hampered by the fact of too little data &#8211; from too few particle events in/at/from a collider.</p>



<p>As we have said: The first Hydrogen atoms were formed around Black Holes. These Hydrogen atoms then became the protons that are in the nuclei of all atoms. A proton is like a bag which encloses several fundamental particles: two up quarks, a down quark, plus an ever-changing number of gluons (bosons) plus every quark has an anti-quark – all of these are moving at the speed of light within this bag – violently &#8211; continually. All is held within this ‘bag’ by the Strong Force.</p>



<p>The secret of Hydrogen is that each possesses a tiny Black Hole. The key to unlocking Energy to allow human Life to continue indefinitely is related to our ability to work with the Black Holes in Hydrogen atoms.</p>



<p>Right here we must confront the mysteries of Black Holes. We need to enumerate all the facts we know about them. And we can supplement this information with our experience of ‘looking out’ from the center of one.</p>



<p>Every Hydrogen atom possesses a tiny Black Hole. It is like every Hydrogen atom has at least one dimension locked up inside of it. This hypothesis has been expanded now that we realize that every proton and hence neutron &#8211; well, every atom in the Cosmos must possess tiny Black Holes at its center. The thing is: Only Hydrogen is able to communicate with the world around it – using this center of Consciousness &#8211; in a Powerful manner. It possesses only one electron that is slightly askew. Gravity from the Black Hole is allowed to leak. Consciousness from the Black Hole is allowed to exert Power upon the world around it. This means: The Hydrogen atom is Theee Gravity Particle. It is Thee <em>I </em>Particle.</p>



<p>Well, all Energy possesses Consciousness – so all particles possess an <em>I . </em>It is just that a tiny Black Hole endows Hydrogen with a Consciousness – with a Power &#8211; that can rule a world.</p>



<p>So: At the time of the Big Bang &#8211; not all quarks, anti-quarks, and gluons &#8211; were pulled into tiny Black Holes. Cosmic goop cooled rapidly enough that some particles were left over to create the first atoms. The first atoms all had a nucleus with a tiny Black Hole plus three quarks, three anti-quarks, and gluons &#8211; in them. The first atoms were Hydrogen atoms. But then this means that all protons possess these quarks , gluons, and a tiny Black Hole. This also means that all elements that possessed protons in the Future – possessed all of these same things. This also means that things made from protons &#8211; like neutrons- also possess the same things. As we say: It would appear that Hydrogen is the only atom from which Gravity ‘leaks’ completely from the Black Holes all the way &#8211; to the outside world.</p>



<p>All protons must have a Black Hole in them. But the rest of the Periodic Table is weak not Powerful like Hydrogen. The strong nuclear Force isn’t the original source of the Energy in the nucleus of an atom.. It just maintains it, guaranteeing that the proton in a Hydrogen atom, for example, remains intact and that its rest mass never changes.</p>



<p>Particles and Fields</p>



<p>Notice: When we were considering the neural Freeway &#8211; it is information &#8211; not charge, electrons, or other particles &#8211; that were moved in this neural Freeway. The trick here is: The basic relationship between particle and field.</p>



<p>All Energy possesses Consciousness. Energy can be formed into either matter or bosons. If its form is that of bosons it is able to be compacted. Bosonic fields are able to have waves of large amplitude while fermionic fields cannot. Their mathematics is additive. Photons end up being a laser. If atoms are placed on top of each other their electrons are in shells they would have to extend these electrons out out even further which would take Energy, Tiny Black Holes formed when matter was composed of quarks and gluons that could be compressed very close together. The Black Hole in your Brain possesses some of the earliest forms of mass that existed in the universe.</p>



<p>The tightest Energy and matter may be compacted is: In a Black Hole. If compacted – the Power of Consciousness is compounded. Again: Think of a laser. All atoms possess protons which possess tiny Black Holes which possess compacted Consciousness. In Hydrogen atoms: The Power of the tiny Black Holes’ Energy and Consciousness is allowed to leak out and interact with other particles. This is expressed either in the form of Gravity which attracts other particles – or it may result in communication with other particles.</p>



<p>The Power of the fields of Hydrogen atoms to communicate with other objects &#8211; falls off with increased distance from those objects. That is: The messages moved in the fields attached to the Hydrogen atoms grow weaker with distance. This is True of all atoms – actually of all particles. Of all the atoms: Hydrogen is the most Powerful. This leads to a hierarchy of atoms.</p>



<p>So: Let us talk about particles in general. It would seem we are progressing a bit backwards here: We started with the <em>I –</em> it is our empirical base – all of our knowledge will move conceptually from this one basic fact: We – are ‘looking out’!.</p>



<p>Light doesn’t seem to have a field. If scientists would look carefully at particles: They would understand that Light is generating its own medium as it moves through space by means of its field which it uses to communicate with other objects in outer space. This field is so limited – it is literally wrapped around the beam of Light: Light must actually literally hit something to communicate with it.</p>



<p>Hydrogen and Gravity</p>



<p>Witness: The size of the planets in our solar system is related to how much Hydrogen is in/on each planet. There had to be a certain amount of Gravity in/on a planet for it to form. Gravity must be related to that Black Hole in each Hydrogen atom. There is the whole issue of Gravity: Newton boldly proposed that Gravity is universal. By which he meant generally that all objects attract all other objects. No one has bothered to check that out since that time. Well, for one thing 99.3 percent of all atoms in the Cosmos are either Hydrogen or Helium. Helium obviously is inert &#8211; it packs no external power at all. This seems to be related to the fact that it possesses two proton, two neutrons and two electrons. So even though it does possess two tiny Black Holes – Forces of Gravity are cut off by all the ofuscation in the way. The same is True for the rest of the Periodic Table – all of which possess one Black Hole in every proton and neutron &#8211; but have more obstacles in the way for Gravity to fight through. Not that much Gravity is able to tunnel through as it is: As is the case &#8211; with Hydrogen.</p>



<p>So: We are left with Hydrogen to make generalizations about. So: If Hydrogen is the Gravity particle well, we will accept that. As we say: It is the rest of the periodic table – we have an issue with. Are we certain that the rest simply do not exert much gravitational pull? Well, we just learned last week that they have found underground water on Mars. We propose: The size of planets in our solar system are related to the amount of water that is present on each planet. Well, more generally – planet size is related to how much Hydrogen that exists on each – that is, Hydrogen that exists on a planet &#8211; in all of its various forms and molecules it is in. Jupiter is largest and is practically all Hydrogen and Helium. Even the moon possesses enough water to account for the tides the moon generates here on Earth.</p>



<p>Of all the atoms on Earth – only 2 percent are Hydrogen. Simply put: Gravity on Earth is generated by its oceans.</p>



<p>So: We are reading this book about the ‘Cosmic Ocean’. We really think this is more than an analogy. The oceans on Earth are instructive. They are made of Hydrogen – well, water possesses Hydrogen and oxygen and a lot of both. Water is the source of all Gravity on Earth &#8211; just as Hydrogen is the source of all Gravity in the universe.</p>



<p>in the case of Gravity – we are talking about merely concentrated Energy. The Energy in this case is not conveying information – it is simply concentrating and inflicting Power upon other particles. What is the difference? Witness!: Electricity can kill a person. Electricity possesses a field which can also convey information. In the Brain there is electrical spark. But information is not conveyed by on and off patterns of electrical charge. Volumes of information are moved in fractions of a second and moved from one side of the Brain to the Hydrogen ion in charge. Messages – patterns of information – necessarily must be ‘fabricated’ from/in a pattern of Energy. Messages must be conveyed by means of information – flowing – over &#8211; a dilute spreading of Energy – well, waves are able to move across bodies of water without moving the water. Messages move over thin spreadings of Energy without moving the Energy. These patterns must necessarily then possess a ‘language’ – a Cosmic language of sorts.</p>



<p>In organic Life &#8211; each molecule is encrusted in Hydrogen atoms. These Hydrogen atoms allow pieces of Life to identity and combine with other pieces of Life. All of Life was made by Hydrogen ions – simply from Tinker Toy shapes of sugar. Hydrogen is always the most powerful Force on Earth or the Cosmos. Since molecules of Life are all made of sugar and thus are all basically the same – organic molecules are identified by shapes not composition. Molecules encrusted with Hydrogen atoms are able to identity various molecules which allows interaction among organic molecules to occur. Life has all of these Hydrogen atoms because Hydrogen ions Created Life and because Hydrogen atoms help Life to continue. Every second of every day: Each Hydrogen atom contains a Black Hole – each contains large Powerful hidden amounts of Consciousness.</p>



<p>Hydrogen and Black Holes</p>



<p>Calculations indicate that spinning Black Holes can spew out particles. OK: So Black Holes can relate with the World around them. After months of calculations, Stephen Hawking found that even nonrotating Black Holes create and can emit particles – that particle – anti – particle thing – where he showed that in a particle – anti-particle pairing – one of the pair can be shut out of a Black Hole. In this way a Black Hole can lose energy. So Entropy conceptually – when it comes to Black Holes &#8211; does exist. Have they forgotten about all that information that is lost every second in a Black hole? Is this degradation not an increase in entropy?</p>



<p>The thing is &#8211; as it turns out: Hawking devoted his entire life to Black Holes. Some would say that that was a waste. As it turns out: He was studying exactly the right subject. There is a tiny Black Hole in the Hydrogen ion that is in our Brain – that is ’looking out’. Also there is Light. Light is related to two conundrums: It is going at the speed of Light apparently through no medium. And a Black Hole emits no Light. Fusion within stars Creates Light. Black Holes devour Light. So: We go back to the beginning: What is the real work of Light? What is it actually doing? Well, it tuns out that there is Light involved in every chemical reaction. One does not see it. It is the Force that nuclei use to move electrons and impact the world around them.</p>



<p>Again: What generates the Light we see? Every time there is a shift in the Energy of electrons: Light appears. Like there is a little Force left over from that movement. If what we are reading is True: Then both Gravity and Light come from the same Source – Hydrogen atoms &#8211; which is a shock!! In a way: These processes are opposites to each other. One is striking out &#8211; attempting to contact other particles somewhere the hell else. The other is sucking all Light and communication in. Somehow a little of that Gravity is ‘leaking’ out and influencing ‘bodies’ around it. So Light is striking out trying to communicate and Gravity is pulling in – isolating itself in a Dark corner &#8211; all from the same source: Hydrogen!</p>



<p>So: Physicists are pretty sure that microscopic Black Holes existed in the chaotic conditions immediately after the Big Bang. These Holes abruptly disappeared. Hawking has produced the mathematics that would have these Holes explode and then evaporate and disappear. We think that these Holes spun through another scenario instead. Each of these tiny Black Holes provided a tiny grain &#8211; around which every existing Hydrogen atom in the universe was built. So: Hawking was looking and thinking about Black Holes ‘out there’ &#8211; when surprise!! &#8211; there were countless numbers of them in his everyday life &#8211; all around him!</p>



<p>So: How are all of these tiny Black Holes related to the gigantic Black Holes in the universe we typically hear about. Well, when a star dies, implodes, and becomes a neutron star – its mass can become very tiny because the fields of all the particles in effect just fold up and allow particles to reside very close together. The same happens in a massive Black Hole. The same happened at a particular moment in the first micro-seconds of the Big Bang – when things were too hot with too much pressure. The first particles were formed from a goop composed of solid Energy – and many were instantly pulled into dots of concentrated compacted matter.</p>



<p>Today: An imploding star might form a Black Hole horizon. The region of space inside it could pinch itself off from our universe. More likely: A tiny Black Hole became attached to a developing Hydrogen atom. The Black Hole in a Hydrogen atom is so tiny that it might not have been noticed &#8211; ever – if scientists were not looking for it. So: The region of Gravitational pulling &#8211; could pinch itself off from the universe and ultimately bring Consciousness into this new tiny dot &#8211; like a tiny Brain. But the concept of wormhole that has evolved recently has arisen as a possible explanation for how the Consciousness in a Black Hole is able to impact the world around it.</p>



<p>So – the Large Hadron Collider – in Geneva, Switzerland: So they are smashing two Hydrogen atoms together in this monstrous device. It is simply a very large circle which is placed 300 feet below territory spanning large areas of two countries. So our question: We maintain that Hydrogen atoms have a tiny Black Hole in them. Why haven’t any been found? Well, first: They are so tiny. A tremendous amount of Energy must be used to discover them. Second: Black Holes probably are not susceptible to being broken up – even in the event of an unlikely collision. And in addition – of course: Physicists just simply are not looking for them. Experiments might be devised that might be more successful – if they begin looking for such a thing.</p>



<p>So the smaller an object is – the more Energy one needs to investigate it in a collider. We would imagine that a tiny Black Hole is as about as small as one can get. As we say: We probably can’t smash one. But we may gain indirect evidence that one is in the nucleus of a Hydrogen atom – if we start looking for such evidence.</p>



<p>.</p>



<p><strong>Putting Pieces of the Puzzle Together</strong></p>



<p>Moving towards a Particle-Centric Perspective</p>



<p>Physics at the present time is a Field-Centric discipline. Particles are seen as being merely: More densely compacted fields. Once sufficient Energy to produce a new type of particle is obtained &#8211; then its field will possess more Power to do stuff – and in turn that particle will possess more rest mass. The fact is: Things must be the other way around! Somehow new particles are given larger masses which allows stronger fields to form. The Higgs boson is important here &#8211; even if it exists only a few microseconds. The generation of new particles takes place in a certain environment. It is in conjunction with a scalding Hydrogen-Helium plasma. Whatever is happening – electrons are doing it. One cannot really blame physicists for being distracted. They are always looking at fields and electrons. They really don’t see the need for particles much at all. Particles for them are just more waves – just an extended part of the fields that are really doing the work. Whereas we know: Fields are merely thin sheets of Energy that they are swimming in – that the Higgs boson and field – assist in creating – along with particles with larger mass &#8211; and fill out the Periodic Table with new elements.</p>



<p>The particles within the proton do not need rest mass – the strong force keeps them where they are. Electrons are different. The force keeping them in place is weak so that electrons need a rest mass to keep them in the proper shell within the atom. What these words mean is this: Physicists are able to obtain only certain measurements of particle-wave activity – most of what they do receive is relate to waves – not particles. But minimum information regarding particles may be received by deduction from the wave data. One is able to deduce what the rest mass of a particle is – from that they are able to calculate the Forces involved. It is the way information is received &#8211; that distracts physicists’ attention away from particles onto fields which actually have little Energy at all.</p>



<p>Physicists simply say: Whatever is happening – electrons are doing it. As we say: One cannot really blame physicists for being distracted. They are always looking at fields and electrons. They really don’t see the need for particles much at all. Particles for them are just more waves – just an extended part of the fields &#8211; that are really doing the work. Whereas we know: Fields are merely thin sheets of Energy that are used for one thing only – the transfer – of information and instructions.</p>



<p>Even if there were no Higgs field, so that quark and anti-quark rest masses were zero, protons’ and neutrons’ rest masses would still be substantial, hardly shifted from what they are today. In other words, protons with rest mass can be built entirely from particles that have none. This is possible whenever a trapping force is combined with</p>



<p>the relativity formula. What these words say is: If a scientist takes two formulas: E =- mc^2 and E <em>= fh</em> &#8211; all crucial information about a particle that is related to this field is readily obtained. One can easily putt putt along without even being aware that every particle &#8211; possesses Consciousness!</p>



<p>By keeping the proton’s contents trapped and in rapid motion, the strong nuclear force both maintains the proton and bears responsibility for most of its rest mass. What these words mean is: One simple formula is able to account for all that a proton brings to the table. Only a small portion of the proton’s net mass arises directly from the rest masses of the particles within. This gives us an explicit example of rest mass being gained. This gives a reader an explicit example of how a scientist is able to compute everything about physical phenomenon without really knowing anything about the particles involved.</p>



<p>The Higgs field helps gives quarks and anti-quarks their rest masses, but ordinary objects obtain their rest mass through the efforts of the Strong nuclear Force. Again: Information about fields supposedly will give one all the information he or she requires to calculate any physical phenomena,.</p>



<p>It is so interesting – well, shocking &#8211; to learn that physicists are not really concerned about particles at all. Particles are difficult to locate, measure, think about. Consequently all physicists have come to focus on one thing – there is only one thing they seem to care about: That is ‘fields’. Fields seem to be the only things they can actually measure and in this way they are actually the only way they can obtain some information about things – fields have certain logical relationships with particles – so fields can tell us things about particles – in a second hand sort of manner. So fields are of paramount importance for physicists &#8211; so it is no wonder that Hydrogen atoms could have been sitting in front of them for thousands of years and they never noticed that each one possesses a Black Hole!</p>



<p>An obvious problem in all of this is: A field’s average value may be doing one thing &#8211; while the waves &#8211; that is the patterns of communication moving from one point to another in a field &#8211; may be telling a second particle to do another.</p>



<p>So: Where we think that physicists are becoming confused is &#8211; they for theoretical reasons well actually because of a paucity of data – they are looking at fields instead of particles. When they look at fields they have no idea what they are doing. What are fields? They are dilute sheets of Energy that merely move information between particles. Each particle possesses a field &#8211; these fields overlap &#8211; become ‘entangled’ and information is allowed to move from one particle to another. So: Physicists’ eyes are fixed upon fields because they are the only things they have data for. The obvious similarity is to the idiot who is looking for his keys under the lamp post. Why not somewhere else which is more probable. Because the Light is better there. They look at fields which are much less important than particles because particles have no information attached to them – immediately available to us. Physicists believe: What little information fields do possess &#8211; can lead to deductions as to what particles are, and what particles actually do. In the process they miss the fact that each particle possesses Consciousness. Each particle is able to perceive, think and act and act with memory. None of this latter is in any quantum mathematics book.</p>



<p>To Be or not to Be: To move – is to exist. A wave &#8211; a field does not exist until a particle moves! Movement requires Energy. Energy denotes that the mover possesses one special thing: Consciousness..</p>



<p>OK &#8211; we are going to just state something that seems crazy – but now that we understand things: It must be True. When one places iron filings on a piece of paper as our Granny did for us a hundred years ago – the magnetic Power comes from the magnetic particles – the impact is a pattern on the paper – as a result of communication of particle to particle &#8211; and not from the Force of a magnetic field. All atomic interactions on Earth are conducted – are possible – only – through particle to particle interactions facilitated by means of – their fields – overlapping and transferring information.</p>



<p>But physicists maintain that even though the fields may not possess Power: In the end &#8211; it is as if they actually did. Particle one says: Do this &#8211; and so particle two: Does that. Is this not like assuming that the field is what is producing the resultant movement? With Granny’s filings: Who is to say that the fields do not produce the observed patterns? How does a field produce a pattern? Magic. All Magic resides in Consciousness. How does this knowledge change anything?</p>



<p>Well!: We say. There is a language involved. There is a hierarchy involved. But then they say: Well &#8211; If orders are always the same &#8211; what difference does it make &#8211; if particles decide or fields have Power? Well the difference is: With this knowledge – physicists can use language to produce changes that are different from what is usually done. Is there is any hope of learning this language? Do we see any evidence of this language’s existence? Have we examined fields in detail to see if language is actually embedded in them?</p>



<p>Is there any way to make visual &#8211; the properties of a field? Magnet and filings. Where is the field? One can see the resultant pattern. How does one physically examine a field?</p>



<p>All of this sounds good until one stops and realizes that what is missing. And it is this: Physicists have no idea what the difference between particles ad waves is: They have no idea what each does. In effect what physicists are saying is: They have no idea what they are doing. It is time to start afresh and realize that things are very small and moving very fast: We need new ways of dealing with quantum phenomena.</p>



<p>Like this: All particles possess Consciousness. This Consciousness allows them to perceive, think, think with memory – and then act. When it comes to action: Electrons are part of a particle’s enabling apparatus. Electrons impart unto particles: The ability to transform ideas into action into implementation – this ability imparts changes in/to the world around the particle. Nuclei talk by means of fields to fields possessed by electrons. Rearrangements in the number and positioning of electrons takes place in accordance with instructions from the first particle coordinated with ideas of he second particle. Both particles work together to form a new molecule.</p>



<p>A particle is indeed made of waves: But one step removed. Maybe it is actually one step – maybe two steps – higher! That step – those steps – is/are crucial and critical. It represents a difference in level of Consciousness. A distinctive jump that separates entities that can command from others &#8211; that are soldiers and can only obey commands.</p>



<p>Well, obviously we are becoming too anthropomorphic!</p>



<p>Well, the fact is: Hydrogen ions – Created Life!</p>



<p>Dark Matter and Dark Energy</p>



<p>The vast majority of the protons and neutrons in our bodies were born nearly fourteen billion years ago. They received their energy-of-being directly from the ultimate Source and so there &#8211; did we. There is a secret embedded in these words: Energy must necessarily be constantly supplied and resupplied. Well, we have to be careful here. The Energy that exists in the universe is constant. Energy is Eternal. It is just that we humans need for Energy to be in a certain place at a certain time. And so much Energy – thought conserved – is dissipated – gone to places unknown. We could say this Energy has left our universe. It is more accurate to say that our universe is expanding when Energy moves at the speed of Light to areas beyond the universe we can see.</p>



<p>Much Energy is conserved in our universe. Much is hidden. So: Humans need to have new Sources of Energy. The most important question physicists should/must be asking is: New Energy? &#8211; from where, how, from what? The answers to most of these questions – we have found &#8211; is related to two words: Dark Matter and Dark Energy.</p>



<p>Physicists proudly announce that they can confidently give you fact and figures regarding approximately – 5 percent of the universe. They hypothesize that there is an additional 25 percent – that is something &#8211; they call: Dark Matter. The rest they confidently assert: Is something they call – Dark Energy.</p>



<p>Swell: What physicists then are saying is: They know practically nothing about their profession!</p>



<p>OK – so we can jump ahead right here. We assert that Dark Matter is obviously the quarks, anti-quarks and gluons from those first Big Bang microseconds &#8211; buried in those tiny Black Holes in the protons &#8211; in every atom. But we have already claimed these for use as the Gravity particle! OK – their being the Gravity particle is on the right track when it comes to looking for something that is attracting other matter – like Gravity does. Dark Matter does act as if it is pulling things in – like Gravity does. Yeh – but!!?? We think we know what has happened here. Please see below.</p>



<p>But first:</p>



<p>OK – then how about the 75 percent of everything that physicists think is – Dark Energy?</p>



<p>OK – so this is tricky. We have already said that tiny Black Holes may be the answer for Dark Matter – how could they possibly be the answer – for Dark Energy too? After all – aren’t these things really really opposites!</p>



<p>Well, we have run into opposites before. How about that electromagnetic wave – that has caused so much Industrial revolution?</p>



<p>Is there not one part that is ‘electro’ – the part that Powers a Light beam as it travels Light years across the universe? Is there not a magnetic &#8211; part – which – is along for the ride. And yet does it not do exactly the opposite? Does it not pull – while the other pushes – propels?! We think we have a counterpart to the electromagnetic phenomena here – in Dark Energy. It is just that it has been hidden – from physicists who have been preoccupied by/with fields. So: Beams of Gravitons – are like beams of Light. They possess both a propelling Force and a magnetic-like, Gravitational Force. The Dark Energy part of these tiny Black Holes – has been hidden – just as the dark Matter part they play – has been hidden from the sight and instruments of physicists – on Earth.</p>



<p>Simply: We hypothesize that tiny Black Holes are: Well, The Wonder Particle!!! Forget God Particle. These poor things have too much to do as it is. Let us recount: Well, First &#8211; we know from personal experience – that Hydrogen is the <em>I</em> particle. As a Consequence: &#8211; we know from our own personal experience &#8211; that every tiny Black Hole at the center of every proton is a Source of Consciousness. Second: These tiny Black Holes also make the Hydrogen atom be: The Gravity Particle. Third: They account for all the Dark Matter that is missing. And: They also account for all the Dark Energy that is propelling the universe outwards.</p>



<p>So – as Promised: Let us look at this Dark Matter well, matter – more closely. We are asserting that tiny Black Holes are the Source for both Gravity from known Sources &#8211; and as well as being the Source for the Gravitational Exertion of Dark Matter. This we feel is the result of physicists’ mathematical calculations. When they calculate the Gravitational pull of existing stars and galaxies &#8211; they are neglecting the fact that there exist in fact &#8211; tiny Black Holes in every Hydrogen atom which possess a tremendous amount of compacted hidden matter. In this way: Tiny Black Holes account for both normal Gravity and the Gravitational pull of a hidden Dark Matter.</p>



<p>The thing is: Expansion of the universe accelerated 5 billion years ago. This is when Dark Energy became conspicuous. We suppose it was there all along.</p>



<p>The vast majority of our protons and neutrons were born in those first microseconds of the Big Bang. Just after Black Holes stopped sucking particles in to it. They received their Energy-of-being directly from the ultimate Source and as did we. There is a secret embedded in these words – Energy must necessarily be constantly supplied and resupplied. What keeps electrons moving moving moving?</p>



<p>Again – the answer is related to those tiny Black Holes at the center of every atom.</p>



<p>The Energy that resides hidden in those countless tiny black Holes: Is there for the taking – if we would just apply ourselves: There is a universe’s worth of this Energy at our disposal.</p>



<p>The Energy that we are using every day came from the Sun. From the Light that has shined down on us and our animal predecessors through millions of years. That Energy ultimately comes from Hydrogen nuclear explosions which convert Hydrogen into Helium.</p>



<p>Now we have information that can give us Energy – that was produced – by the Big Bang – itself!! Well, let us make one thing clear: All Energy is eternal. All that exists was Created at the moment of the Big Bang. What is left: is all a matter of conversion of one kind of Energy to another. And a matter of conversion of matter and Energy back and forth – as they are interchangeable. Witness: E=mc^2!</p>



<p>Hydrogen ions possess Consciousness. Hydrogen ions Created Life. – in gradients – in clusters of ions – in primeval oceans. We have written extensively about this in other minibooks. If we can learn their language: We can put Hydrogen ions to work Creating stuff – for us – now! And we can do it for Free! Right here: We have an infinite supply of renewable Energy at our disposal. We will just do as the electrons do – swiftly bow to and fro: Well, they seem to be moving forever &#8211; with no apparent Source of Energy &#8211; moving in accordance of the rhythms &#8211; the musical strands of waves &#8211; of Dark Energy &#8211; exuded by tiny Black Holes – hidden in the center of every atom!</p>



<p>People who have read our other minibooks will quickly ask: But hold it! We are talking about using Hydrogen as a Source of Dark Energy. And have we neglected to noted elsewhere in this minibook that Hydrogen accounts for only 2 percent of the atoms on Earth. And are they not only in two places?: The oceans and in Life. And is not Hydrogen also the Gravity Particle? We must be careful not to use up the Gravity that allows us to stand.</p>



<p>OK. It will take us a few years to learn the Cosmic language used by Hydrogen ions. And learn to work with them. In that time we can develop ways to get to Jupiter which is composed mostly of Hydrogen and Helium. Well, It has so much Hydrogen – that is why it is so huge. And we can devise ways to build immense tanker rockets which can transport liquid Hydrogen back to the vicinity of the Earth where it can be used. Free Energy is no longer free. But we think clever engineers on Earth – can make this work.</p>



<p>The Higgs Boson</p>



<p>One is amazed at how Life with its astounding menagerie of various animals and plants – somehow seems to be able to always – concoct something that is presentable to the world around them. We mean: Life is the product of a mixture of accident and plan. When Hydrogen ions concocted Life – they laid out certain basic relationships among physical entities, with a certain basic strategy as to how to assemble the constituents of water and carbon dioxide like Tinker Toys. And then they just let things go: Evolution took over. Much of the latter was accident. Yet products which have resulted &#8211; have been surprisingly nicely done. Somehow – some way – there always seemed to be a Force nearby which would/could quickly Create a presentable package for this new wiggily piece of Life.</p>



<p>Is there not the same process – phenomenon – present at the Cosmic level? Well, there was the Big Bang. There was a Cosmic explosion with mass destruction and debris. Something swooped in instantly and sort of cleaned up the mess. Instantly: Quarks, anti-quarks, and gluons were Created.. They were the first bits of Energy to be wrapped for presentation to the Cosmos.</p>



<p>Well: From the first &#8211; there were the Higgs boson and a Higgs field. From the first: There were things. And there were ways to get things done. From the first instants – there were Forces at hand – readily able to make certain that in an event of an explosion – things – well, debris – would be wrapped immediately – nicely – exquisitely &#8211; in Christmas-type packages.</p>



<p>So: It was with the appearance of the ‘weak’ Force &#8211; that it became apparent that some sort of Higgs boson and its field &#8211; were necessary – to ‘clean up’ – ‘accidents’ that might result from Cosmic activity. Pion and muon decays provided the major clue about the weak Forces of elementary particles that would lead directly to the Higgs boson.</p>



<p>Let us recount: There were the ‘radioactive’ transmutations between all the particles that were discovered during he 1950s and 1960s that involved the ‘weak’ Force. During the 1950s and 1960s the cyclotron was invented. Particles were routinely smashed into each other and new particles were found in the debris. We have always questioned whether these were actually new ’particles – or were they somehow merely really ‘cleaned up’ presentably-made packages of basically insignificant debris – trash? That is: Are these merely causalities – collateral damage &#8212; of a ‘war’ that is continually being fought – at the Cosmic level. It was in this mass of confusion that the ‘weak’ Force was first encountered.</p>



<p>When it comes to the Higgs boson – well, no one seems to care about the particle – it is the Higgs field that is paramount here. As we say: This preoccupation with fields seems to be ubiquitous for physicists. Everyone says that the Higgs particle is the “god’ particle’ it gives mass to particles. Well. Now all physicists know about it &#8211; and it has taken the last hundred years to discover it: The ‘resting mass’ of particles is related to a ‘stiffening ‘ of the fields attached to the particles which have been given mass. The ‘stiffening’ of fields &#8211; is part of the package-making ability of this boson and its field.</p>



<p>Now it should be obvious: The Higg’s field’s ‘stiffening’ and making packages of debris that has already been made does not cause one particle to become another particle – this change in particles occurs just at certain times in a star’s evolution and it is the Hydrogen atoms which initiate all change. That is – the Higgs boson and field seem to operate primarily within fusion explosions of stars. They work with Hydrogen ions to induce increase rest mass in particles which in turn generates fields that can do more work in communicating messages and orders. The Higgs boson and its fields are never the initiators of anything. Even after Cosmic wave incidents – they merely swoop in to help clean up the mess.</p>



<p>Does the Higgs field have a medium? Maybe it is like Light and like Gravity. These generate their own fields which are the media for particle communication and are nestled closely to the major particle – they are along for the ride.</p>



<p>So many questions concerning the Higgs particle and field are answered when it is remembered that these normally operate only in an atmosphere of intense heat and pressure with the Powerful assistance and intelligence &#8211; of Hydrogen atoms – always nearby.</p>



<p>Energy and Consciousness</p>



<p>.</p>



<p>Consciousness: All chemical reactions are driven by Consciousness Energy in physics is precisely defined. But it is more difficult to explain. This is because it can do different things. Every ‘inch’ of Energy possesses Consciousness which can perceive think and act. Every particle can impact the world around it. Wherever Energy exists – it is available to be put to ‘work’ by particles nearby to impact the world around the particle. There are all sorts of different types of ‘work’ that this Energy may be applied to do.</p>



<p>You can now see how important the concept of Consciousness is to this whole enterprise now. Physicists are now concentrating on the be tail that wags the dog. They are most interested in fields rather than the Consciousness the decisions the particles that are being made that are involved in the course of a day’s work. One can see that little further progress can made without the concept of Consciousness.</p>



<p>The thing is: When it comes to the second Law of Thermodynamics – only Consciousness can build up – all else in the universe leads to loss and dissipation. All Action occurs in stars. Hydrogen is slowly turning into Helium</p>



<p>We hypothesize that the Consciousness in Hydrogen ions in these stars is going back and forth – from one individual Consciousness &#8211; to all &#8211; and back again. When a discipline neglects Consciousness – that discipline has lost half of its explanation of things.</p>



<p>So: Hawking: As we say &#8211; he is famous supposedly for showing mathematically that a Black Hole is actually conforming to the second Law of Thermodynamics. Somehow a particle and its anti-particle become separated on both sides of an event horizon and as a consequence it loses mass. QED.</p>



<p>Well, there are two reasons that Black Holes don’t even have to worry about such deviations from Cosmic Law: First: Some were formed in the first milliseconds of the Big Bang and have not acquired mass since. Also: All have Consciousness and Consciousness is the only phenomenon in the Cosmos that builds &#8211; all else leads to entropy. Every Hydrogen atom contains an <em>I </em>which can do stuff!!! For example: Clusters of Hydrogen ions Created Life.</p>



<p>Now it is clear why/how Consciousness is kept out of the story. First the How: Physics is now a science of about ‘fields’: Not particles. We mean: Fields are just carriers of messages between particles &#8211; but physicists are convinced that particles are just intense extra concentrated parts of waves and fields. It is the fields that are the important actors in physics and therefore in chemistry.</p>



<p>Well, we would never attempt to guess why scientists have intentionally avoided the topic of Consciousness. We can simply and Truly tell you what the consequences have been.</p>



<p>When one avoids the topic of Consciousness – one avoids complete lines of thinking. Energy is never Created. All Energy is Consciousness. Only Consciousness can Create the new. Clusters of Hydrogen ions Created Life! Only Consciousness Builds. All else is in the process of falling into Entropy disorganization – absence of Light.</p>



<p>In physics there is a Law: The Law of the conservation of Energy. Energy is never lost – it is merely converted to other forms of energy until such energy is dissipated and spread out into the eternties. Consequently Energy must always be in the process of being generated &#8211; to replace the Energy that is sent out into outer space. Energy is created only by Hydrogen atoms. E =- mc^2 is happening now in every star. E <em>= fh</em> happened only in a few microseconds during the Big Bang. The first is the relativity formula – which converts Energy to matter and the reverse. If one knows stuff about a field &#8211; he or she can quickly calculate information about a particle. Once one has the Energy in a particle one can use the relationship between Energy and rest mass of a particle – a rest mass that was Created in the first micro-seconds of the Big Bang – well, if one has the particle’s rest mass -what more could one ask for – concerning a particle?</p>



<p>The Energy demands of a human body are about 60 watts – the same as a single old-style incondescent bulb. This energy for daily consumption, obtained from food, is minuscule compared to the Energy stored in a humans’ rest mass – that is, which is stored mainly within one’s protons and neutrons.</p>



<p>To provide the 60 watts of Power that you would need &#8211; the relativity formula tells us: We would have to convert the rest masses of a trillion protons and neutrons every second. This might seem like a lot. But it is tiny compared to our body’s stash of protons and neutrons &#8211; which number: 10^29 &#8211; which is a hundred thousand trillion trillions. If it takes a trillion protons to power a 60-watt bulb for one second, the Energy stored in our body could keep that Light bulb lit for about ten billion years, If released at once: The resulting explosion would be equivalent to a gigaton – one billion tons – of TNT explosive. The destruction of rest mass drives this explosion. One can calmly state facts like this. But what are we missing? We shall save these ideas for our conclusion.</p>



<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>



<p>Like so many things in this book, the Planck mass is both huge and tiny. It’s the rest mass of 10^18 protons or 10^23 electrons, gigantic numbers that nevertheless don’t add up to much by human standard &#8211; just the rest mass of a typical grain of sand. Still, that corresponds to the energy of three tons of TNT explosive, which would be a lot if it were trapped in a single elementary particle. With a rest mass equal to the Planck mass, such a particle would form a Black Hole with a diameter a hundrd billion billion times smaller than that of a proton. This miniscule size is called: The ‘Planck length’.</p>



<p>So: Light is really &#8211; not just Light: It is a Force routinely relied upon by nuclei to work with electrons and impact the world around them. So which is more important: Light or Consciousness? Light seems to be a sort of a lubricant – not really a god particle or anything like that. It sort of helps chemical reactions to occur. The Source of god – of Consciousness &#8211; seems to be found mainly in Hydrogen atoms. There seems to be a tiny Black Hole in every Hydrogen nuclei. If that is True then there should be a Black Hole in every proton – period. Thus the rest of the Periodic Table possesses Black Holes also – but that Consciousness is blurred or made less effective because of all the protons, neutrons, and electrons buzzing around these nuclei. Of course physicists are not aware of &#8211; much less concerned about &#8211; any of this. Their focus is totally fixed upon fields – not particles.</p>



<p>So: Hadrons like the proton and neutron are composed of quarks. These can never be released. Information about the innards of hadrons is received indirectly. Hence there could be a tiny Black Hole in each and there would be no way of knowing that such a thing exists. Whatever means is used to detect quarks simply cannot discern the existence of a Black Hole. It simply does not emit any evidence of its existence. Still it seems to be the Source of Gravity.</p>



<p>We can look to empirical evidence: There is a Hydrogen ion in our Brain and indeed something is ‘looking out’. Which means such a Hole must be able to ‘leak’.</p>



<p>Also very seldom has the university with its 12 disciplines noticed the Cosmic <em>I . </em>Actually something more sinister seems to be at play here: it would seem that this topic is simply always carefully avoided. Philosophy is the only discipline which has looked the Cosmic <em>I</em> straight-way in the eye. Biology when it is considering the ramifications of Darwin’s evolution may broach the topic of Consciousness. But in general such talk concerning the <em>I &#8211;</em> is almost illegal it would seem. It is just not allowed – in polite company. Yet it is apparent now that the topic of Consciousness is almost an essential topic for discussion in all the disciplines – if progress is to be made in intellectual and scientific thought generally. Indeed &#8211; If humanity is to be able – to survive!</p>



<p>In all of this – the most important telling information can be received: Merely by ‘looking out’. And then somehow as almost an afterthought &#8211; we realize: Yes! There is -something inside of my head – ‘looking out’. That realization is the first step towards solving all of the world’s major problems, puzzles, and meeting all the World’s great challenges.</p>



<p>As we say: There is one Hydrogen ion in charge of one human body. If we accept the hypothesis that there is one Hydrogen ion ‘looking out’ from our Brain which is in charge of our body – then surprising things may be said about human Life: Well first &#8211; that ion is in charge of around one hundred trillion cells. Each cell has approximately 10^17 atoms. This means that our Hydrogen ion is in charge of approximately 10 ^28 atoms. Every cell in Life is made of sugar which means that each cell in the human body is composed of essentially three elements – hydrogen, carbon and oxygen. Over one &#8211; third of these are Hydrogen atoms or about 4 x 10 ^27 other Hydrogen atoms.</p>



<p>Each cell has two Hydrogen ions in charge. If two people meet and fall in Love and feel as if they are bonded for an eternity: They have beaten so many odds to be in charge of human bodies to begin with. This will never happen again. From our experience we can say things that are likely – for example &#8211; each hydrogen ion seems to possesses its own personality. The brain adds much but still there seems to be differentiation among atoms. They may seem to be identical: However it is probable that they are more like snowflakes – each one is unique. We feel it is possible for two <em>I s &#8211; </em>to bond forever. There is no way to prove this. All we have is human experience. As we say: This human experience is already – something very special: It is Consciousness that has overcome great odds. Such triumph should not be sullied. People should not be killed in war or in any other sort of conflict. Each flick of Consciousness is precious – groups of Creative Hydrogen ion Consciousnesses should be utilized to facilitate progress here on earth. Such overcoming of probabilities must not be wasted.</p>



<p>The slim probability that a hydrogen ion may be in our Brain – &#8211; ‘looking out’ &#8211; in charge of my body &#8211; brings to mind other possibilities that we haven’t entertained before. Perhaps the everyday experience of being a Hydrogen ion is a pretty spectacular thing . Given the fact that little Life actually exists in the universe. Just being a Hydrogen ion may be a pretty spectacular thing in a star – Hydrogen ions are able to exist in mass &#8211; In such a mass Hydrogen ions possess Consciousness that goes back and forth between one individual to all becoming one Gigantic <em>I .</em> Perhaps the same sort of thing happens in a human body. Some are in charge some are not. But all are in communication with each other. The rest of the periodic table Is just sort of left out.</p>



<p>So the Hydrogen ion in charge is a spectacular unlikely miracle. Well, what we have here is quite likely True. The more we learn the more Light is shed everywhere. We must just concentrate upon making contributions to science and showing that leaving half of things out – simply results in very slow progress.</p>



<p>It’s not so much that Life is precious – it is the fact that each person aLive has an <em>I </em>&#8211; that has overcome unconscionable odds to be in the commanding position they are – we need to sanctify, honor that miracle and not just go around killing people and making their Lives miserable.</p>



<p>All people are <em>I s &#8211;</em> and they are all miracles. We need to work to see that their Lives are worth living – are at least a beneficial experience.</p>



<p>We have hit the jackpot of sorts. So there must be a goal we are leaning towards. Finding that one <em>I &#8211;</em> or group of <em>I s &#8211;</em> that we can be with through the remainder of the eternities..</p>



<p>We naturally think that Life is a good thing. Perhaps for most Hydrogen ions it isn’t so great. Perhaps just running around blowing up in the Cosmos is a lot more rewarding than being One with others. On Earth most Hydrogen atoms and ions are slaves lost in the deep recesses of different recesses of a frost sort of Life that is generally brutal and disgusting.</p>



<p>So the books say: Electrons define the entire world of chemistry and biology, the world that our eyes can see and about which our brains can think. Electrons are essentially ‘us.’ These sentences capture the essential blindness of current physics.</p>



<p>Atomic nuclei are most important &#8211; they possess Consciousness. Fields and electrons are used by particles to communicate with and impact the world around them. If we are to find a new source of Energy for the future of the World – it must be framed around a particle of some sort. Electricity, for example, requires billions and billions of electrons a second to Light a Light bulb. If we could on the other hand simply work <strong>with</strong> particles – <strong>with </strong>atomic ions – well, Hydrogen ions created Life! We will have Power. We will have intellect working <strong>with</strong> us – <strong>for</strong> us.</p>



<p>In books we are reading: Physics is becoming pathetic. Physicists are crying for funds to do more research. Well, the fact is: The United States has an enormous debt problem. These books keep saying things like: Research in science is a ‘no-brainer’ – it always pays back more than it costs. Well, unfortunately the US is asking right now: What have you done for US lately? There has been close to Nothing for 60 years. So: One-fourth of each of these books ends up like when we were in consulting firms – we would constantly be trying to get more work – and we know the type of specious thinking one puts in those kinds of proposals and the last part of most of these books is simply ends up to be: One large proposal for grants to do more research.</p>



<p>The authors of these books say that accelerators, colliders are themselves the answer to the clean Energy problem. Not only will would they help discover facts, particles that might help the situation – they themselves can help by physically generating electricity themselves and by helping to get rid of spent nuclear fuel and radiation. All of this seems to be part of a desperate sort of grasping at solutions that consulting firms often make to sell a bill of goods. These rants and pleas &#8211; seem very unlikely to persuade anyone.</p>



<p>You know: People are furious at the United States because they were building an American Large Hadron Collider and then stopped. Well, the US is simply running out of money – we do have enough to be the leader of the World. But also we think that people at the top &#8211; just sort of suspected that the field of physics was contaminated: With Ego and Hubris. There must be a more intelligent way to spend money and build the Future!</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-amazon wp-block-embed-amazon"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="The Big Bang" type="text/html" width="317" height="476" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen style="max-width:100%" src="https://read.amazon.com/kp/card?preview=inline&#038;linkCode=kpd&#038;ref_=k4w_oembed_kMFwku5hKihGGE&#038;asin=B0DKCJJW1D&#038;tag=kpembed-20"></iframe>
</div></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-embed aligncenter is-type-rich is-provider-amazon wp-block-embed-amazon"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="The Big Bang" type="text/html" width="317" height="476" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen style="max-width:100%" src="https://read.amazon.com/kp/card?preview=inline&#038;linkCode=kpd&#038;ref_=k4w_oembed_kMFwku5hKihGGE&#038;asin=B0DKCJJW1D&#038;tag=kpembed-20"></iframe>
</div></figure>



<p>.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">THE END</p>



<p><strong>Bibliography</strong></p>



<p>Hawking, Stephen, Leonard Mlodinow, <em>The Grand Design </em>{New York:</p>



<p>Bantam Books, 2010}, 198 pp.</p>



<p>Kaku, Michio, <em>The God Equation – The Quest for a Theory of Everything</em></p>



<p>(New York: Doubleday, 2021), 225 pp.</p>



<p>Lederman, Leon, Christopher Hill, <em>Beyond the God Particle </em>{New York:</p>



<p>Prometheus Books, 2013), 325 pp.</p>



<p>Lowe, Stuart, Chris North, <em>Cosmos – The Infographic Book of Space</em></p>



<p>(London: Aurum Press Ltd., 2015), 224 pp.</p>



<p>Ottaviasni, Jim, Leland Myrick, <em>Hawking </em>{New York: First Second, 2019),</p>



<p>298 pp.</p>



<p>Penrose, Roger, <em>Cycles of Time – An Extraordinary New View of the</em></p>



<p><em>Universe </em>(New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2010), 288 pp.</p>



<p>Rovelli, Carlo<em>, White Holes </em>(New York: Riverhead Books, 2023), 158 pp.</p>



<p>Strassler, Matt, <em>Waves in an Impossible Sea – How Everyday Life</em></p>



<p><em>Emerges from the Cosmic Ocean </em>(New York: Basic Books, 2024),</p>



<p>373 pp.</p>



<p>Tucker, Wallace H., <em>Chandra’s Cosmos – Dark Matter, Black Holes, and</em></p>



<p><em>Other Wonders Revealed by NASA’s X-Ray Observatory</em></p>



<p>(Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Books, 2017), 266 pp.</p>



<p>Watson, Bruce, <em>Light – A Radiant History frp, Creation to the Quantum</em></p>



<p><em>Age </em>{New York: Bloomsbury, 2016), 282 pp.</p>



<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://cftheater.info/blog/the-big-bang-a-fresh-approach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meditations &#8211; Cartesian and Andresalovichean Ruminations</title>
		<link>https://cftheater.info/blog/meditations-cartesian-and-andresalovichean-ruminations/</link>
					<comments>https://cftheater.info/blog/meditations-cartesian-and-andresalovichean-ruminations/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 11:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mini Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meditations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minibook]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftheater.info/blog/?p=1572</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[by Frank W. Andres © Copyright Frank W. Andres 2024. All right Reserved. Fire Mountain Publishing 4075 Vineyard Ave. Pleasanton, CA 9566 Please visit our website at www.CFTheater. Info Please&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image is-style-rounded">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="644" height="1024" src="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/81La5YcdeuL._SL1500_-644x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-1573" style="width:460px;height:auto" srcset="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/81La5YcdeuL._SL1500_-644x1024.jpg 644w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/81La5YcdeuL._SL1500_-189x300.jpg 189w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/81La5YcdeuL._SL1500_-768x1222.jpg 768w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/81La5YcdeuL._SL1500_.jpg 943w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 644px) 100vw, 644px" /></figure>
</div>


<p>by</p>



<p>Frank W. Andres</p>



<p>© Copyright Frank W. Andres 2024. All right Reserved.</p>



<p>Fire Mountain Publishing</p>



<p>4075 Vineyard Ave. Pleasanton, CA 9566</p>



<p>Please visit our website at <a href="http://www.cftheater.info">www.CFTheater. Info</a></p>



<p>Please communicate with us via the following Email</p>



<p><a href="mailto:frankandres@MyYahoo.com">frankandres@MyYahoo.com</a>.</p>



<p>Introduction</p>



<p>These are ‘letters’ from both sides of the Brain. Well, Descartes as everybody knows &#8211; wrote his thoughts centuries ago. Well, he left one side of the Brain out. So we will attempt to correct that omission here. We have a Creative Cluster and I and my son, Will, are a part of a small but swarthy band. Well, swart to the extent that we be ‘heavy’ dudes and dudes – thought-wise. Well, Will and I within that proud group are known affectionately as: ‘The Flying Andresaloviches’. This fact might satisfactorily address any questions that might reside at this point.</p>



<p>In 1641 &#8211; one of the smartest of all left hemispheric persons in the history of the world (Rene Descartes) wrote a book. It was one in a series of books he wrote during this period – but it is the one which most philosophers think of today – when they consider the work of this great man. At the time that it was written : <strong>It &#8211;</strong> was simply one of the most important books ever written. It led ultimately to Industrial Revolution. But in one respect &#8211; it failed. As we say: One half of the human Brain &#8211; is missing!</p>



<p>Descartes first discards all belief in things that are not certain. He then turns to establish what can be known – for sure.</p>



<p>His first consideration is: That the existence of God – must be demonstrated. Actually God is not required here – at all. ‘God’ – the one with a beard – has been Created by something that is a precursor – to ‘God’: That something is &#8211; Consciousness – well, human Consciousness. Quite simply: There is the <em>I.</em></p>



<p>It is the<em> I: </em>That always warrants &#8211; first and primary consideration.</p>



<p>The <em>I</em></p>



<p>Descartes began with what he felt was one unassailable fact: I think – therefore I am. As we have pointed out in previous minibooks – this statement is not a tautology as many have maintained. The two words: ‘I think’ – point to one concretely proven fact: <strong>The fact?: The existence of – the </strong><em><strong>I.</strong></em>Consciousness in this case &#8211; is an empirically proven fact.</p>



<p>What does it take – for a fact to be proven experimentally?</p>



<p>Well, first &#8211; it must be pointed out here – in this paragraph &#8211; that this author (Andresalovich) is utilizing only half of a Brain. Descartes is supplying the other half. It is this author’s hope that by using both sides of the Brain in one exercise – some one proof of something – anything – might result. Thus: We are attempting to prove that any one thing is experimentally proved to be True. Like Descartes – we are not fussy. We simply will take anything. Once we have that one certainty – everything else in the world &#8211; must necessarily follow</p>



<p>Experiment. Laboratory Bench. All deduction must begin with experimentally proven ‘fact’. Deduction is simply equations. Descartes’ world &#8211; is a world of equivalences. It is a world of mathematics: There is never any ‘new’ information involved here – at least not &#8211; from an equation. New information must come from somewhere else.</p>



<p>We assert: All ‘proven’ fact must come from the right side of the Brain. First there must be hypothesis. First: there was Theee Idea! In the following pages we shall consider &#8211; how the right side of the Brain accomplishes this amazing – and most necessary step.</p>



<p>Second: Hypotheses are extended to experiments &#8211; to see if these Ideas work in the real world – in four dimensions – well, five dimensions when one includes ‘Energy’. We need to receive the same desired results time and again. It is worthy of note – right here – that even repeated with results from experiments – nothing is ever proven to be True &#8211; with absolute certainty. This is ultimately because: All breakthroughs must begin with the right side of the Brain – which works in accordance with a process of thought that can never yield – absolute certainty. One can see right here: Descartes search for absolute clarity and distinctness – is in trouble – right to start with. All conclusions – right or left Brain must begin with inductive thought – which can never yield Absolute Certainty.</p>



<p>Decartes believed that that one experimentally proved ‘fact’ was obvious<strong>: I think.</strong> Well, he – was convinced that something inside of his head – was thinking. As all existentialist thinkers have pointed out: There is always one step before this statement. What we are saying is: The second step – the ‘I’ in this statement – always possesses a first step – this first step is &#8211; an <em><strong>I.</strong></em></p>



<p>This first <em>I </em>is &#8211; usually overlooked. This first <em>I &#8211; w</em>hoever whatever this might be – possesses: Consciousness. This first <em>I &#8211; i</em>s simply ‘looking out’. This is an empirical observation – which is the only observation we may make concerning this subject. This observation is ‘empirical’ – in what sense? Well, my Consciousness is satisfied that it – itself – exists. Well, beyond this: Such Consciousness &#8211; <strong>must </strong>exist. Because there are always two steps involved: First, it is established that – something is ‘looking out’. That is &#8211; first we note that there is indeed an <em>I &#8211; </em>’looking out’. Then second we just merely pause and enjoy – concentrate our intense examination upon – the fact – that I am – actually – empirically – ‘looking out’.</p>



<p>Let us pause here for a second. This last statement may seem – trivial. How many have simply noted this fact – and not recognized an obvious underlying fact: When we undertake this intense thorough examine of our ‘looking out’ – we are actually undertaking an empirical examination – a genuine experiment of sorts. Such empirical examination must actually prove that our assertion that our Consciousness exists – is True. Consciousness exists – because I just happen to notice that my existence must necessarily be True. Otherwise my <em>I &#8211; </em>must be extinguished!</p>



<p>I ultimately do not know what this <em>I</em> is. I shall never know. I can only experience what this <em>I </em>does. It is ‘looking out’.</p>



<p>If we are right hemispheric dominant – we may use induction to obtain additional Truth concerning our Consciousness. We can utilize 12 disciplines and Create a synthesis – a web of thought &#8211; including ideas from all disciplines and make an educated guess as to what this Consciousness may be made of. In the following pages we shall be calling upon the breakthroughs we have made &#8211; all of our previous books and minibooks. From all that we know in our inductive manner &#8211; we can conjecture that this phenomenon of Consciousness must be related to Energy. Energy is a thing. It is also an experience. There is a part of us that <strong>is </strong>Energy. We cannot physically inspect our Consciousness itself to understand what it is. We can only write down what we are experiencing &#8211; as we ‘look out’ from the center of this Consciousness. The experience of being Energy thus &#8211; <strong>is</strong>: The experience of ‘looking out’.</p>



<p>What we learn from all of this when it comes to Consciousness is: There must be two things – there is the observer and the observed. The observer can only be observed in the act of observing – what is actually observing can never be ascertained. Also its behavior in the act of observing also can never be intensely inspected. In the end – as a result of inductive synthesis: We are only able to subsequently step back and state what this Consciousness must actually be consisted of.</p>



<p>After years of work – the right side of our Brain can finally say with 99.99 percent certainty: Our Consciousness must be the workings of Energy that is confined within a Hydrogen ion – that is located in our Brain – and is in control of our body..</p>



<p>Einstein said that E = mc^2. We say that E = <em>I </em>!!! That is &#8211; from the basis of our experience – we can go on and hypothesize with less certainty that: All Energy &#8211; must possess Consciousness! All particles are packets of Energy – thus, all particles also must possess Consciousness. Such Consciousness must be either compacted and Powerful or to different degrees dilute – and less Powerful. The most powerful packets of Power &#8211; which are Hydrogen atoms &#8211; are able to perceive, think, and act – think with the aid of memory – and enact Change upon the world about them. Other particles and fields possess lower rankings of Power. Other atoms are soldiers and can react to orders and implement them &#8211; and nothing else. Fields – well, they are so dilute in Energy – that they are able to do only one thing – move information and instructions – from A – to &#8211; B.</p>



<p>Descartes says that the left side of the Brain says: I think therefore I am. The right side of the Brain retorts – no this should be: <em>I </em>think – therefore I write. This written record is Proof of the <em>I</em> ‘s existence. I think therefore I am – well, this statement shows that something has happened. The second establishes that a thing called Consciousness has come up with ideas and has made a concrete record of such ideas. This record is Proof of the existence of same Consciousness – but as we have said elsewhere: The right side of the Brain can never achieve absolute certainty.</p>



<p>So Decartes: We shall examine his mode of thinking and then contrast that with a right hemispheric approach. A good place to start is with Descartes’ ‘Meditations’. That will be followed by Franky’s ‘Meditations’ wherein concerns of the right side of the Brain are addressed.</p>



<p>Descartes’ Meditations</p>



<p>Mediation #1. Descartes is utilizing deduction to seek Truth as he is obviously left hemispheric dominant in his Brain. He is filling the page with equivalences as all deductive people do. As a consequence &#8211; to obtain any substance to work with: Decartes requires ‘real’ facts, data to work with &#8211; from which all deductions may be made. He has obviously decided to obtain such facts from an examination of his own mind. As many philosophers have always done – he has decided to gain facts by means of examining the operations of his Brain &#8211; from the inside out! Descartes is not aware but: He is like all humans &#8211; he possesses a Hydrogen ion in charge of his Brain and his entire body. This Hydrogen ion is able to perceive, think, and act – its thought is supplemented by memory located both within the Brain and an innate memory located within the ion itself. He shall utilize this ion to obtain knowledge from investigation of his Brain. As the ion investigates this Brain: It moves from data which is most clear and distinct to data that is less so. He realizes that a place that we really need to start is: With his ideas concerning God. As we have said: Actually this step is not really necessary. A better place to begin is with a perons’s own Consciousness – with his or her &#8211; own <em>I.</em></p>



<p>Mediation #2. Well, Descartes inspects his Brain and comes to the conclusion that it is easier to ascertain the nature of his mind than any other part of his body. He may be fooling himself here. One really needs to be right hemispheric dominant to take 12 disciplines and realize that what is ‘looking out’ of his eyes – is a Hydrogen ion. So: Using this mind that he really has little knowledge of at all – he notices that his Brain is attached to a body. This body has face, hands, arms, and whole frame of parts. He establishes a fact that seems to be a ‘clear’ and ‘distinct’ idea: He establishes that he is indeed – a thinking ‘thing’.</p>



<p>He must at this point establish that he is not dreaming. So at the end of the meditation: He realizes that he must assume that he is awake and that he must begin his exploration of himself and the world around him with the one thing he knows ‘for sure’ – he thinks that he at least knows that he possesses a mind &#8211; well, as we say, in the end it appears that he knows very little about even that.</p>



<p>Notice that we use the word: ‘So’ – a lot. There may be objection that we are not really proving things – when we deliberately use such a vague word to advance our thought. Of course our reply is: The right of the Brain &#8211; is not utilizing deduction at all – it actually is physiologically incapable of doing do. Instead the right side of the Brain uses another technique to record its discoveries: That of the Story. Well, one discipline that displays the ultimate Power of the right side of the Brain of course is: History. Which is – the story of Life on Earth. History contains all the Content of Life’s activities – whereas mathematics displays all the Forms of thought. These disciplines thus are representative of polar extremes in thought. They utilize the ultimate tools of each side of the Brain. It must be stressed that these abilities are physiological abilities. A person is either right or left hemispheric dominant in his or her Brain. One cannot be both. Each Brain has one alpha charge or the other. One can never possess more than half – of the Truth of things.</p>



<p>Meditation #3. So: Descartes realizes that he cannot really trust his perceptions of stars, earth, sky – his only certainty is 2 + 3 = 5.</p>



<p>He seems to be left (pun alert!) with a Brain full of mathematics. There is not real content here at all! As we say &#8211; the right side of the Brain seems to be required to fill the Forms in his mind – required to fill his Forms with what we would call: History. As we say: Mathematics is a world of all the forms that may be used by the left side of the Brain in making deductions – creating Truth by means of analysis. History is the world of induction &#8211; of synthesis – of theses &#8211; a world that is able to fill the Forms of the mind with Content of Life.</p>



<p>Descartes has ‘clear’ and ‘distinct’ ideas concerning God. His God seems to be: Eternal, infinite, unchangeable, omniscient, omnipotent, the Creator of everything save himself. But as we know: The left side of the Brain has a criminal history of conjuring fantastic palaces of imaginative Forms that in the end have no relation to reality. They work by themselves &#8211; and their hubris often leaves us with little – usually after we have spent much precious time and money. We can expect no more than what that sordid history promises &#8211; from fantastic ideas concerning God.</p>



<p>As for parts of the body and objects outside of the body – at some point Descartes needs to realize that the Universities require different disciplines which can study all objects and animals external to us in detail and then the right side of the Brain may work with the left side to Create great syntheses of understanding about Everything!</p>



<p>Meditation #4. So: It is now apparent that Descartes is staying away from his senses. He finds certainty only in his thoughts – which are filled with mathematics and Form. We have already seen that any ideas he might have about God &#8211; are probably bogus. He is left with a Brain full of mathematics. Descartes concludes that this Meditation is his most important and most Powerful. He believes that all of his left hemispheric Powers are consistent with his ideas of God and probably come from God. Well, they do come from Consciousness. But from only one side of the Brain. Q.E.D.</p>



<p>Meditation #5. Do objects exist without – in both senses – Descartes’ mind. Things have an increased probability of existing and yielding Truth if they are measured:</p>



<p>‘In this volume I have deduced the causes – which I believe to be quite evident – of … many phenomena from principles which are known to all and admitted by all, namely the shape, size, position and motion of particles of matter. And anyone who considers all this will readily be convinced that there are no powers in stones and plants that are so mysterious, and no marvels attributed to ‘sympathetic’ and ‘antipathetic’ influences that are so astonishing, that they cannot be explained in this way. In short there is nothing in the whole of nature…which is incapable of being deductively explained on the basis of these self-same principles.’ <em>(Principles of Philosophy, Pt IV, art. 187</em>).</p>



<p>Once objects are measured: Mathematics may be applied and conclusions reached which may have a high level of certainty. It worries Descartes that he can conceive of a figure like a triangle that may not ever exist on Earth. It is right that he should worry. He is as bad as an ecclesiastical personage – when he encounters problems: He seems to immediately look to a faith in God for distinctness and clarity. This presumably is a God that is ensconced somewhere in some mathematical multiverse of 10 dimensions! Descartes does possess a modesty that many of his successors have not. He acknowledges that most of the Truth in the World about him – is shrouded in doubts.</p>



<p>All of this seems to leave Descartes in some sort of limbo: His strategy to deductively attack upon the world seems is on one hand destined to pay great dividends. On the other hand: So much is in the hands of the senses – whose contribution to Truth and Knowledge – must always be suspect.<em>.</em></p>



<p>Meditation #6. So: We have thought about things a lot. There is only one thing left to do. We need only to ask one final question: Does any of this – exist? (For us peering at the World from the right side of the Brain &#8211; this is received to mean &#8211; that if we of the ‘right side; might be allowed expression at this point – we will do so – with howls of hilarity! We are sorry but we mean: All this work and even at this point – after having cleared the shrubbery of all confusion and doubt – we are left with one certainty: We don’t even know – for certain &#8211; that we exist! Thjs is – a sad state of affairs! ) When it some to existence: We have eliminated dreams. How about imagination? How about the green genie in the corner?</p>



<p>Well, it seems that Nature has attempted to teach Descartes what is real and not. Well, he concludes that even with this help we are left in a land of: Maybe Yes &#8211; maybe No. This applies to objects outside of his body and even his body itself. Everything outside of his mind – is once removed. There is always doubt.</p>



<p>The number of cells in the human body vary from between ten and one hundred trillion – related to different ages of human bodies, we suppose &#8211; each cell has two Hydrogen ions in charge of the activities within. Every atom in each cell possesses Consciousness although many have their Consciousness completely or partially blocked by electrons and by molecular combination. Also Hydrogen atoms possess 50 times the Power in their consciousness as the carbon and other atoms created by the Higgs field. But what a responsibility it is &#8211; maybe even what an immense Power it must be &#8211; to be in charge of so much. Perhaps one day it will be a relief to be relieved of such responsibility and worry.</p>



<p>Descartes and Existentialism</p>



<p>Descartes seems to be more of an Existentialist than has been thought: After all &#8211; he is &#8211; examining the workings – of the <em>I. B</em>ut he did not take the final step necessary to be a Nietzsche or a Kierkegaard &#8211; to be on that slippery slope desperately hanging on to keep from falling forever into a type of insanity or becoming a God himself. Descartes goes to the point that he is aware that he possesses a genius deductive ability: He is proud of it &#8211; he has confidence in it. As long as he possesses that ability he is certain that he is alive &#8211; that he does in fact exist. He is not like Nietzsche – he does not stop to consider that <strong>he</strong> is looking out!!!! <strong>He </strong>is the center of the world &#8211; the Cosmos. He does not stop to think: Does everyone else feel this way but somehow does not notice it? How can everyone in this room believe that they are the center of the universe? If they just stopped and really thought &#8211; they would realize that each person is like a small God!!!!! What one person is experiencing – all humans in the world – are experiencing!!!! This is Crazy!!!! Descartes doesn’t go that far. He simply stops – he simply makes a God &#8211; out of the deductive process!</p>



<p>Two Sides of the Brain</p>



<p>So &#8211; we can state two things that Descartes does not: First he does not state that his Consciousness is able to perceive, think, and act – with the assistance of memory. Second he does not state as Plato does – that his Consciousness has innate abilities and preoccupations: Will, Love, Truth, Beauty, and Justice. He simply is not enamored of the fact that he is in fact ‘looking out’. He is too much infatuated by the fact that he is a genius and is able to deduce things that other people are not. Well, we are grateful that he started the Enlightenment which relatively quickly led to, allowed, stirred many minds to action – Powering the world to Industrial Revolution. Thank you Mr. Descartes</p>



<p>Two sides of the Brain.. Patterns of similarity are first discerned by the right side of the Brain. The right side existed first in humans. Then the left was added only 60,000 years ago in the frozen climes of the Arctic where humans had migrated up up up from Africa and the middle East up into the north north northern parts of Asia. It is here that the left side of the Brain which always was present in minuscle amounts when it began &#8211; to increase in numbers until today it accounts for two-thirds of the human population. The left side existed in certain species of predecessors to apes such as the Macaab monkey – which has been identified as being able to use both sides of the Brain in different individuals. Also in humans when there is a pair of identical twins – there is one of each side of the Brain. This is an obvious source for the first left hemispheric dominant person. Being such – would enable one to be of exceptional stature and worth in a frozen environment in which the right side was severely hampered. The first Warrior chiefs and shamans may have been such individuals. Subsequently the abilities of the right side of the Brain have been is neglected, unnoticed except as being identified as being stupid.. Yet the abilities of this side of the Brain are crucial to the progress of intellectual thought.</p>



<p>Andresalovichean Meditations</p>



<p>Meditation #1, We are not entirely certain which meditations belong where &#8211; but here are some ideas: We are aware of an entity ‘looking out’. It is in charge of a lumbering mass of atoms called a human body. The right side of the Brain detects similarity. It also Creates Syntheses. It comes up with concepts. Which become verbal words. It comes up with ideas of causal relationships among objects. We see one thing happening – we automatically expect another things to happen. This leads to hypothesis. Whenever we see this one thing happening – we come to automatically expect that – something will happen &#8211; After. This is all part of a physiological ability – that we right hemispheric dominant people innately possess These espyings of patterns of similarity &#8211; in the dynamic interactions of objects external to our minds &#8211; lead to chains of visual sightings and subsequent visual expectations. This leads to extended hypotheses – theses – stories &#8211; if you prefer – as to what has happened, why these things have happened and thence onward into expectations as to what may occur in the Future. All of this comes from a neglected side of the human Brain.</p>



<p>So the right side of the Brain: One of us has received a 235 I.Q. on the only test that measures abilities of the right side of the Brain – it is a performance test – the Wechsler-Bellevue Block Test. Thus Everything in this minibook &#8211; is based on personal experience. The left side of the Brain does one thing: State equivalences. The right side does one thing: Notice similarities. All concepts in thought concerning the World &#8211; come from the right side of the Brain. All concepts concerning the physiological construction of the left side of the Brain – are contributed by left hemispheric dominant individuals. These physiological constructions result in thought patterns that somehow have proved to be of worth – in the human striving – to seek and find Truth! As we say: Right and left hemispheric dominance is in different individuals. One person can never possess both.</p>



<p>Witness how the different sides of the Brain – work individually – and then work together. For example: Just look at words – each is based on a concept – which first emerged from a right side of a Brain. We see a chair – immediately we remember another chair we have already seen. Two things looking the same. Out of billion different things – our minds automatically discern similarity among two things. Instantly automatically. When we see a third thing that is similar &#8211; we are inclined to attach a ‘name’ to it. This first meditation is devoted to the Creation of objects of note. These objects receive an importance do to similarity – to the extent – to the end – that they become endowed with – a <strong>name.</strong></p>



<p>Meditation #2. But there has to be another step before an entire village will adopt our proposal for denomination of a object in our lives. There is similarity among shapes of objects in our vision. There must be also a similarity in: Function – before a name for an object will be adopted. What do we mean by this word ‘function’ ? Well, the essence here is: Cause and effect. Chains of causation. Again similarity is the key ability – that innate ability &#8211; which bequeathed us ‘chairs’. But the first step has yielded : ‘Chairs’ &#8211; with no function. We notice that we see ‘chair’ – then we see one sitting on such a structure. We see another chair and another person sitting on it. When we see chair – we then begin to anticipate. We begin to expect! Expect a second visual image. That of a person coming to sit on this chair. Boom then Boom. Similarities in patterns of occurrences among activities occurring around among objects that have previously been given names on the basis of similarity among objects. We are able to generalize. We are able to make a hypothesis: A chair raises the floor. It allows a person to sit and reflect or eat. Chains of cause and effect lead to the naming of objects. This leads to a verbal language. This is a first step.</p>



<p>Written language is a second step: It is a left hemispheric invention. But it necessarily was preceded by the verbal language which was the invention of the right side of the Brain and as seen above – with its genius ability when it is present to discern similarity – among objects – and movements among between objects. When this happens – we see one thing- we see one action – we then automatically look for something to come – After!</p>



<p>Mediation #3. When the left side of the Brain works: It is the opposite – one sees a movement among objects and instinctively with the aid of genius looks for &#8211; Before. Aristotle called this the search for: First Cause. We Look for the Cause of patterns. The right side of the Brain as we have seen with Aristotle – who seems to have been right hemispheric dominant in his Brain – he is able to conduct a very primitive and largely ineffectual way of ‘deduction’ of its own. Aristotle simply asked – what is the first cause in a given chain of causation? As we just said above – one just simply starts with one part of the chain and asks: What came Before – then what came &#8211; Before that? These questions continue until there are no more questions to be asked. When a first cause has been detected one realizes as Aristotle did: One has the entire sequence of interaction by the testicles so to speak. One has a hypothesis &#8211; a thesis as it were &#8211; for why certain things happen. This sort of examination is the essence of historical writing. This is how theses – are born. This sort of thinking simply prepares the way for the entrance of the second side of the Brain – it is right here that both sides of the Brain may start working feverishly and most productively – together!</p>



<p>Meditation #4. Well, it is up to the right side of the Brain to Create syntheses &#8211; so we shall take on that responsibility right here right now – since we are the only ones to properly do so. We have seen how the left side of the Brain works. Then the right side. Let us use our Powers of synthesis and lay out a plan – a story – for how both sides of the Brain might – work together. The Beatles. Stanley Laural and Oliver Hardy. Michael Faraday and James Clerk Maxwell. Too often people with right and left hemispheric dominance in their Brains &#8211; have working separately &#8211; isolated from each other in space and time. This has delayed progress immensely. Once in a while this isolation is breached and breathtaking results ensue.</p>



<p>Meditation #5. Emotions, passions, a primal language. Uniification of mind and body. Temporary state. Solitary partilcles. The hope for dual unification of two individuals for an eternity. Individuals with different neural physiological abilities – may now work together to confront and conquer the world’ most pressing problems!</p>



<p>Meditation #6. Indictment. Criminal Irresponsibility. So much Progress lost. So much ability neglected. So much ability wasted. So much time and money misspent. Children’s lives squandered. We draw a line in the sand here – now. No more criminal behavior on the part of those who should know better – should act better.</p>



<p>Instauratio Magna</p>



<p>We are convinced that we would not be able to do anything of worth without a person equipped physiologically from us &#8211; as you are. And you left hemispheric dominant people &#8211; are not just mere some type of muses or something. Somehow your Great Brain leads the way. Combines with our abilities such that the final products are all ours.</p>



<p>There was one man – Sir Francis Bacon &#8211; who understood that in his time and in science in general &#8211; there was a whole side of things that was missing. In the end all must be included in one great work – one great Synthesis. One Instauratio Magna. This work was begun in his <em>Novum Organum. </em>His Great Work then added to his many of his other ideas would result in the following important ingredients:</p>



<p>First, he called for a survey of all the sciences &#8211; that is, an integration of all the disciplines.</p>



<p>Second, he called for a new scientific method based upon the strategy of analogy – that is, upon the perception of similarity in all things.</p>



<p>Third, he asserted that all disciplines needed to be integrated, utilizing the examination of cause and effect.</p>



<p>These three steps would then result in a fourth step – which would be a new philosophy – the commencement of a work for future generations to do &#8211; which would integrate all disciplines, all knowledge into one final complete Synthesis of everything.</p>



<p>What Bacon was missing in all of this was: The why, the who, in all of this. What he did not realize was: In the generation, Creation of all of this knowledge &#8211; there actually would be different physiologies involved. That is, before there could be an integration of all knowledge &#8211; there had to be the inclusion &#8211; the integration of all abilities. This integration was begun by the works of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Hegel discerned that there must be two different types of thought involved. There was an analytical type of thought and an inductive type. Hegel’s abstract ideas had to be transformed into physiology. Mental activity was translated into physiological abilities –- by the work of Roger Sperry at Cal Tech who examined the Brains of schizophrenics whose Brains had been severed into two parts He established that each hemisphere of the Brain possesses its own abilities, what those abilities are, and which intelligence tests measured the abilities of each. What remains to be done is to determine how these different abilities might be able to work together to Create intellectual thought, how individuals with different abilities might be identifiesd, then educated each in its own way, and then how instruction might continue with the integration of individuals of both types as they learn to work together to attack the great challenges of a modern world.</p>



<p>Conclusion</p>



<p>OK &#8211; so we get it: Consciousness.</p>



<p>At the outset we stated our objective to be one thing. We needed to discover one thing – that is undoubtedly True. Well, there is the <em>I . </em>And yes &#8211; that is it! There is the fact for certain: That I possess a Consciousnesss &#8211; which if it did not exist – this minibook would never have been written.</p>



<p>Consciousness. This is a word that is just simply not allowed In the conversations of polite society right now. Yet we maintain with all the vigor at our disposal &#8211; that this topic must be addressed in its whole form right here &#8211; right now – even if is only in complete secrecy. Meanwhile other things might progress in the open – in schools &#8211; without controversy: Identification of different intellectual abilities, each ability possessing its own educational strategies and treatments, and finally, individuals each with different abilities learning to work to together. This must begin now &#8211; starting at kindergarten.</p>



<p>So much scientific and economic progress has been made in just three hundred years. Things are so perfect right now. But three hundred years ago &#8211; even 150 years ago – this world did not exist! But now we must acknowledge that this speed has abruptly bought us to: <strong>The Future</strong>. We are there. Right here. Right now. We must go directly to the next steps: Stop world population explosion, find new sources of Energy, cure Cancer, develop automated cities, all – everyone &#8211; working in Creative Clusters of Innovation and thought. All people in the world &#8211; must be integrated into one supreme intellectual and economic effort. Together – we all – must work together – to build – the Future!!!!</p>



<p>THE END</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-amazon wp-block-embed-amazon"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Meditations - Cartesian and Andresalovichean Ruminations" type="text/html" width="317" height="476" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen style="max-width:100%" src="https://read.amazon.com/kp/card?preview=inline&#038;linkCode=kpd&#038;ref_=k4w_oembed_akLK3uG3R6eoSW&#038;asin=B0DGGT7Y64&#038;tag=kpembed-20"></iframe>
</div></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-embed aligncenter is-type-rich is-provider-amazon wp-block-embed-amazon"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Meditations - Cartesian and Andresalovichean Ruminations" type="text/html" width="317" height="476" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen style="max-width:100%" src="https://read.amazon.com/kp/card?preview=inline&#038;linkCode=kpd&#038;ref_=k4w_oembed_akLK3uG3R6eoSW&#038;asin=B0DGGT7Y64&#038;tag=kpembed-20"></iframe>
</div></figure>



<p>Bibliogrpahy</p>



<p>Cottingham, John, <em>Descartes</em>. Part of the Great Philosophers Series,</p>



<p>Ray Monk and Frederic Raphael, Consulting Editors (New York:</p>



<p>Routledge, 1997), 58 pp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://cftheater.info/blog/meditations-cartesian-and-andresalovichean-ruminations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quantum Mechanics, And The Future  Looking at Physics – from the Inside Out</title>
		<link>https://cftheater.info/blog/quantum-mechanics-2/</link>
					<comments>https://cftheater.info/blog/quantum-mechanics-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 13:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mini Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minibook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quantum Mechanics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftheater.info/blog/?p=1560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Black Holes, And The Future Looking at Physics – from the Inside Out by Frank W. Andres © Copyright Frank W. Andres 2024. All right Reserved. Fire Mountain Publishing 4075&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-style-rounded"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="614" src="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/wormhole-5319067_1280-1024x614.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-1561" srcset="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/wormhole-5319067_1280-1024x614.jpg 1024w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/wormhole-5319067_1280-300x180.jpg 300w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/wormhole-5319067_1280-768x461.jpg 768w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/wormhole-5319067_1280.jpg 1280w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Black Holes,</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">And The Future</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Looking at Physics – from the Inside Out</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">by</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Frank W. Andres</p>



<p><br>© Copyright Frank W. Andres 2024. All right Reserved.</p>



<p>Fire Mountain Publishing</p>



<p>4075 Vineyard Ave. Pleasanton, CA 9566</p>



<p>Please visit our website at <a href="https://cftheater.info/blog/?p=271" data-type="post" data-id="271">http://www.cftheater. Info</a></p>



<p></p>



<p></p>



<p>Please communicate with us via the following Email</p>



<p><a href="mailto:frankandres@MyYahoo.com">frankandres@MyYahoo.com</a></p>



<p></p>



<p></p>



<p>Introduction</p>



<p>Black Holes and Science: So – several things. Black Holes are a key thing to study in modern physics. Well, there is a Black Hole in our Brain. There is a Hydrogen ion with a Black Hole &#8211; In our Brain that is in charge –‘looking out’. So: A Black Hole is actually doing – the studying. But in addition, Black Holes are in a sense at the Center &#8211; of physics. The most essential Thing in ‘physics’! We have found that every Hydrogen atom with its Black Hole &#8211; is Theee Gravity particle. It is Thee Force that is missing in physics. Einstein manufactured SpaceTime to explain why Gravity is not right in front of us. We have a different hypothesis: We claim that Gravity is ‘hidden’ in tiny Black Holes. Hidden – right before your eyes!</p>



<p>It just so happens: We are the best people on Earth equipped to criticize physics at this moment. We are unable to deduce. So we are not ‘snowed’ by mathematics. And physics is mainly a mathematical discipline at the present time. We were a math major for three years. We understand what math is about – how it works – it is a science of patterns – we get this. We also understand that when a discipline simply gives itself over to one device such as the use of mathematics – it is pretty much devoting its attention to what one half of the Brain can do. Another side is absolutely &#8211; left out. Not even considered. Not even acknowledged that it exists! At least in the discipline of physics. As for other disciplines the same is generally True. Well, in history one can still obtain A’s with four pluses on papers because the right side of the Brain can very well devise intelligent syntheses. And when it comes to the sciences &#8211; we suspect that someone in the universities knows -that &#8211; that side of Brain exists and is important: Well, many of our friends who are dominant in the right side of the Brain – seem to have ended up as engineers! But when it comes to the ‘real’ sciences of chemistry and physics – well, the right side of the Brain simply does not exist.</p>



<p>We on the other hand: Are fully equipped when it comes to that side of the Brain. We understand how it works. We know how to take its strengths – its teachings – and go straight to the throat of quantum mechanics – for example. People do not understand quantum mechanics. This is because it is wrong. Quantum Gravity really doesn’t exist. This is because it is entirely flawed. The Fact is: The New Physics must begin with one word: ‘Consciousness.’ This is a word of which all scientists seem to have been afraid – afraid that one day it might appear. Yet it exists – in every particle – in the Cosmos. Doesn’t this sound as if it might be very fundamental &#8211; not just to the discipline of physics – but to All of Existence – to all of the disciplines &#8211; in general?</p>



<p>The Rise of Quantum Mechanics</p>



<p>So: Max Planck proposed the existence of a fundamental constant in Nature: Now known as Planck’s constant and denoted by the letter <em>h. </em>Planck was very soon thinking about communicating with alien civilizations. Well, we are thinking about communicating with the alien world of the non-microscopic. Perhaps Planck’s constant will resonate in that conversation</p>



<p>Niels Bohr’s idea of quantized electron orbits helped make sense of the Light emitted and absorbed by Hydrogen, but seemed to be pulled out of a hat, and didn’t really work for elements other than Hydrogen. This is because as we say: Hydrogen is special.</p>



<p>There is a reason &#8211; that physicists become confused about particles and waves: The word ‘quantum’ referring to some definite amount of stuff, can give the impression that quantum mechanics describes a world that is fundamentally discrete and pixelated, like when you zoom in closely on a computer monitor or TV screen. It is actually the opposite: Quantum mechanics describes the world as a smooth wave function. But in the right circumstances, where when individual parts of the wave function are tied down in a certain way, the wave takes the form of a combination of distinct vibrational modes. When we observe such a system, we see those discrete possibilities. That is true for orbits of electrons, and it will also explain why quantum fields look like sets of individual particles. In quantum mechanics, the world is fundamentally wavy: Its apparent quantum discreteness comes from the particular way those waves are able to vibrate. These were the ideas of Louis De Broglie.</p>



<p>Erwin Schroedinger came next &#8211; who in 1926 put forth a dynamical understanding of wave functions, including the equation they obey &#8211; later named after him. It is Schroedinger who completely confuses particle with wave. The Schroedinger equation was a hit. But no one really stopped to think.</p>



<p>Every version of quantum mechanics (and there are plenty) employs a wave function or something equivalent, and posits that the wave function obeys Schroedinger’s equation, at least most of the time. Physicits think that they can safely predict: Schroedinger’s mistakes will simply be the ingredients in just about any theory they can take seriously. We on the other hand believe that the World is in need – of a particle theory &#8211; not a wave theory. Waves merely move information. We need a theory for the real actors – for the real Powers of the Cosmic Stage.</p>



<p>It is important to write the words – that physicists are using. One must carefully consider words physicists use in their science. Words can cleverly disguise the fact that much is not known. In physics &#8211; mathematics is used to deal with ‘waves’. These entities are called ‘waves’ but words are supposed to attach conceptual meaning to the mathematics the words are next to. So: The word ‘Mode’ is used when a physicist is describing a wave. In metaphysics the word ‘mode’ &#8211; which is basically from the discipline of philosophy – in which this word is really seldom used – its definition is: A manifestation, form or manner of arrangement; in general use, a particular form or manifestation of some undetermined substance, or some permanent aspect or attribute of such a substance.</p>



<p>The word ‘mode’ actually comes from physics in this case – when where the discipline considers the field of music. Here is some clarification of this physics concept. Consider a string with its ends held fixed, such as on a guitar or violin. Even though any one point can move up or down as it likes, the overall behavior of the string is constrained by its being tied down at either end. As a result, the string only vibrates at certain special wavelengths, or combinations thereof; that’s why the strings on musical instruments emit clear notes rather than an indistinct noise. These special vibrations are called the <strong>modes</strong> of the string. The essential ‘quantum’ Nature of the subatomic work, in the picture these words are intended to evoke &#8211; come about not because reality is actually subdivided into distinct chunks but because there are natural vibrational modes for the waves out of which physical systems are made.</p>



<p>Let us consider- now &#8211; how the word ‘mode’ is used in physics texts:</p>



<p>Waves reside within ‘regions’. Waves possess ‘substances’ which can be denominated ‘modes’ – these are areas that vibrate at certain wave lengths. The modes inside one field become entangled with modes in another field – that is &#8211; waves become overlapped which they must do to transfer information – from one to another – from modes inside one wave to modes in another. This means: Waves are composed of Energy. Well all things are composed of Energy. This Energy may be dilute, spread over large areas of space and not in the least be discernable. Energy may be concentrated into particles. All Energy possesses Consciousness. The more concentrated such Energy is – the more Power &#8211; the more action &#8211; it might be able to impart to the world about it. So: Particles possess fields – which are called ‘waves’ and these ‘waves’ can become overlapped and used to transfer information from one particle to another. The more Power a particle possesses the more information it is able to transmit to a neighbor in the form of orders that a less Powerful recipient automatically obeys.</p>



<p>Particles and Waves</p>



<p>So: Very fundamental to the concept of quantum mechanics is the word &#8211; ‘Wave.’ But the word ‘Wave’- can have no fundamental meaning, no fundamental reason for existence, no way of being utilized as a concept in mathematical exercise – if there is no such thing as ‘Consciousness’. The Cosmos is filled with particles. These particles are wherein Consciousness resides. Particles, in turn, utilize waves to communicate with the world around them. There is a Hydrogen ion in charge of your Brain. All of physics starts with one thing: I think – therefore I am! No – actually this cry should be &#8211; I &#8211; am ‘Looking Out!’ If something in physics does not make sense – just remember: The answer in every case comes from the act of remembering – simply remembering how your Brain works. Physics is involved in your every act of – ‘Looking Out!’ Your Brain perceives. What do think is doing this perceiving? Your Hydrogen ion perceives by means of a wave that is attached to it. That ion is then equipped with the ability to think. This ability to think is equipped with a memory to assist in this act. There are certain acts that are a bit automatic. Memory can be a bit mechanical for most particles. Yet the potential is always there for – Decisions. Even in a Life that is ruled by instinct – that Life endures because particles can perceive, think and then take Action! Humans pride themselves on possessing the ability to create new thoughts. Yet most of our Lives are routinized. Much is out of our control – controlled by particles within us that are we are not aware of – particles that are capable within their own jurisdiction to perceive, think, and then act. Every one of our cells has two Hydrogen ions in charge – one within the cell in the centrosome and the other in the cell wall for external communications and intercellular interaction. Plants don’t even have one ion in charge. They operate every moment by means of clusters of cells working together for extended minutes. The octopus is an example of an animal which has one ion in charge – yet each of its arms may act independently each with its own single ion dictating the action.</p>



<p>Now let us jump to phenomena that are considered central to the discipline of physics. Like say: Black Holes. First of all: We are working with 12 different disciplines. And using these we utilize induction &#8211; a method of making syntheses – like putting pieces of a puzzle together. One is unable to gain absolute certainty with this ability – and a physical ability it indeed is – an ability possessed by only one third of the population. Each person is dominant in one of the two hemispheres in his or her Brain.</p>



<p>Each person possesses a Hydrogen ion that is in control of his or her Brain. This ion – like all Hydrogen ions – possesses a tiny Black Hole. The Science of Black Holes is missing empirical verification of mathematical nonsense. This is sad and unnecessary – as every human being is an expert when it comes to Black Holes. You are ‘looking out’ from the center of One! Oh yes: Supposedly there is a hologram sort of operation going on wherein information that a Black Hole possesses is expressed in detail on the two-dimensional surface of its event horizon! What sort of information are you talking about? You think you know what this information looks like, where it is located? In your Brain: The ion which is in charge &#8211; possesses Consciousness! It possesses a language. It is able to communicate by means of waves with other particles. What do you mean when you say that all the information in a Black Hole is somehow etched into the surface of its event horizon? The damn thing is filled with Hydrogen atoms which are communicating with each other! The Black Hole that is in your Brain is obviously communicating with the world around it. How does a Black Hole operate? Are physicists lacking information that every person on Earth has personal knowledge about?</p>



<p>So – let us calm down: The Copenhagen approach to quantum mechanics says that when a particle is measured &#8211; the wave that it generates every microsecond &#8211; collapses – until it resides at a point &#8211; that the particle is at &#8211; at the moment it is measured – which is understandable if one realizes that the particle must move to generate its wave. The reason that it is so important for physics to know both the location of a particle and its velocity is supposedly so that calculations regarding particle impacts upon the world around it can be made. Schroedinger’s equation, the mathematical engine of quantum mechanics, dictates how the shape of a probability wave evolves in Time. Give a physcist an initial wave shape and he or she can use that equation to draw a picture of what the wave will look like in a minute or an hour or any other moment. This is the ‘information’ that physicists are talking about.</p>



<p>This is not the ‘information’ we are talking about. A particle generates a wave in order to transmit and receive ‘another’ – a different type of &#8211; information. At all times physicists are attempting to avoid the fact that particles possess Consciousness. Yet how can progress be made if physicists totally ignore the messages that particles are transmitting and receiving from each other. Well, one might proffer that the information that is sent back and forth is the result of mechanical automatic methods – hence particle motion and position pretty much give you all the information you really need. Well, if you are going to use particles in a brute force manner as modern men and women do with electrons in a light bulb well, maybe – but if we are going to tap into the Power and Energies that we need to power the Earth – to find new Sources of Energy that may be hidden &#8211; then we need to deal directly with these Sources of Consciousness, learn their language &#8211; work with them instead of just moving them around in senseless countless masses of movement. After all we are 99.9 percent certain that Hydrogen ions were smart enough to have &#8211; Created Life.</p>



<p>The whole purpose of particle waves is to move instructions and other information from particle to particle – and we are going to ignore this? We are only going &#8211; to look at their position and movements?</p>



<p>Empty Space and Degrees of Freedom</p>



<p><strong>Empty Space</strong>. ‘Empty’ space is not really ‘empty’. Places are full of ‘quantum degrees of freedom’. ‘Empty’ space is a richly textured place, full of quantum degrees of freedom. ‘Quantum degrees of freedom’ is a very abstract term referring to various points within a place within so-called ‘empty’ space – points that are actually each filled with vibrating fields. Presumably these vibrating ‘fields’ are filled with Energy – that is not visible to a viewer by any means.</p>



<p>So: Places within Space are presumably ‘empty’ but in actuality these are filled with Energy which is not visually or otherwise discernable to the scientist. It is these places that are filled with Energy – and so at this point it is not certain if the scientist thinks the fields or the places in which the fields are located &#8211; are what cause physical things to happen – that cause physical things that are &#8211; visual. At this point no consideration of where, what, why, or any other aspect of any particle is displayed either in any text or any equations that might be offered to the reader. We are simply left with fields – actually just places – of interest. We are left studying – <strong>Places of Interest</strong>. All of which of course slips easily into a discussion and physics of merely two things: Time and Space. Everything has surreptitiously slipped into a completely Cartesian consideration. All of this is very convenient of course – it would be very embarrassing if someone not thoroughly schooled in a physicist’s manner of thinking might innocently ask: But why – does anything happen? Without particles – there are simply no actors present – to take that action.</p>



<p><strong>Degrees of Freedom</strong>. When physicists refer to the different numbers they use to specify something – such as a particle’s position or momentum – they call these a system’s ‘degrees of freedom.’ In Newtonian mechanics, to tell a person the complete state of a bunch of particles, one would have to tell him or her the position and momentum of every one of them, so: The degrees of freedom are all of these positions and moments. Acceleration is not a degree of freedom, since it can be calculated once we know the forces acting on the system. The essence of a degree of freedom is that it doesn’t depend on anything else.</p>



<p>When one switches to quantum mechanics and starts thinking about Schroedinger’s wave functions, things become a little different. To make a wave function for a single particle, think of every location where the particle could possibly be found &#8211; were a person to observe it. Then to each location the physicist must assign an amplitude, a complex number with the property that the square of each number is the probability of finding the particle there. There is a constraint that the squares of all these numbers add up to precisely one, since the total probability that the particle is found somewhere must equal one.</p>



<p>Notice that we didn’t mention ‘velocity’ or ‘momentum’ here. That is because we don’t have to separately specify the momentum in quantum mechanics, as we did in classical mechanics. The probability of measuring any particular velocity is completely determined by the wave function for all the possible positions. Velocity is not a separate degree of freedom, independent of position. The basic reason why is that the wave function is, well, a wave. Unlike for a classical particle, we don’t have a single position and a single momentum, we have a function of all possible positions, and that function typically oscillates up and down. The rate of these oscillations determines what we are likely to see if we were to measure the velocity or momentum.</p>



<p>Physicists work extremely well – without particles.</p>



<p>Black Holes and Gravity</p>



<p>OK we are also working to come up with ideas concerning Gravity and Black Holes:</p>



<p>Energy existed throughout the universe microseconds after the Big Bang. This Energy possessed all four types of Forces: The Strong, Weak, Electro-magnetic, and Gravity. The Cosmic Microwave Background which various instruments now can detect &#8211; shows that there was 50 times as much Energy originally in the universe before the Big Bang – than exists now. We hypothesize that this Energy was initially absorbed into the tiny Black Holes which are known to have filled the universe shortly after its Creation. We hypothesize that these ultimately became the nuclei of Hydrogen atoms. Only 1/50ths of this Energy is allowed to seep from these nuclei into the wider Cosmos. Hydrogen atoms are continually being transformed into Helium atoms in every star. So: The missing Energy must be hidden within the tiny Black Holes that reside within the Hydrogen and Helium atoms that comprise 99,3 percent of the atoms in the Cosmos. The dimunitive amount of Energy that seeps out of these particles &#8211; explains why Gravity is so weak generally, why and where the initial Energy disappeared to, and why the Gravity particle has been so difficult to find.</p>



<p>Now let us jump to phenomena that are considered central to the discipline of physics. Like we say: Black Holes! First of all : We are working with 12 different disciplines. And using these we utilize induction a method of making syntheses – like putting pieces of a puzzle together. One is unable to gain absolute certainty with this ability – and a physical ability it indeed is – an ability possessed by only one third of the population. Each person is dominant in one of his or her two hemispheres in his or her Brain.</p>



<p>Each person possesses a Hydrogen ion that is control of his or her Brain. This ion – like all Hydrogen ions – possesses a Black Hole. The Science of Black Holes is missing empirical verification of mathematical nonsense. This is sad and unnecessary – as every human being is an expert when it comes to Black Holes. You are ‘looking out’ from the center of One! Oh yes: As we say &#8211; supposedly there is a hologram sort of operation going on wherein information that a Black Hole possesses is expressed in detail on the two-dimensional surface of its event horizon! What sort of information are you talking about? You think you know what this information looks like, where it is located? The ion possesses Consciousness! It possesses a language. It is able to communicate by means of waves with other particles. What do you mean when you say that all the information in a Black Hole is somehow etched into the surface of its event horizon? The damn thing is communcating with everything around it! We ask again: Are you physicists lacking information that every person on Earth has personal knowledge about?</p>



<p>So: Black Holes and Gravity. News bulletin: In 2016 &#8211; researchers over at the LIGO and Virgo gravitational wave observatories announced the first direct detection of gravitational waves, created when Black Holes a billion light years away spiraled into each other.</p>



<p>Black Holes and Entropy</p>



<p>So: The second Law of thermodynamics states that a body must increase in entropy over time. Well, this is commonsense. If nothing is building something up – then over time it will simply breakdown if left by itself. Another way of saying this – well, in our words – well, we simply have our own – second Law<strong>!: Only Consciousness can organize and maintain. </strong>Without the continual presence of Consciousness there can be only increasing chaos. See: Right There &#8211; we have a totally brand new physics! A physics that acknowledges the presence – no! the absolute necessity of there existing Consciousness &#8211; everywhere &#8211; all of the time.</p>



<p>But Black Holes seem to counteract thjs Law. After all: They are supposedly composed entirely of what tremendous Forces of Gravity can smash together over an eternity of Time. So: A mass within the Black Hole &#8211; must be becoming greater all of the time. OK: So there are two clues that physicists ae simply missing things here. First: If things are increasing in organization &#8211; that is – they are losing entropy – then <strong>our</strong> second Law states with finality that Consciousness must be present and involved. Second: If Black Holes seem to be increasing in mass – look again – they simply may have existed since Consciousness created them at the time of the Big Bang. For instance: It seems probable that every Hydrogen atom possesses a tiny Black Hole that was present at the first moments of the universe’s birth. A corollary to both of these statements might be: Black Holes that are increasing in size right now may actually be an increasing aggregate of existing Black Holes. Also: Obviously now it would appear that – Gravity possesses Consciousness.</p>



<p>Consider an idea you will often hear: ‘Atoms are mostly empty space.’ This idea comes from a stubborn insistence on thinking of an electron as a tiny classical dot zipping around inside of a wave function, rather than the electron actually being Thee wave function. We are here duplicating some words of some idiot – words that are provoking us to action.</p>



<p>Sorry!: Obviously an electron is not a wave function. So what is an electron? Well, both the nucleus of &#8211; well we shall posit an Hydrogen atom as being the primary particle in question. So – Hydrogen atom: Both nucleus and electron in this particle possess waves, that is fields around them. In this way the nucleus can ‘talk’ to the electron. The electron has a field such it can talk with its nucleus and interact with other atoms. In a more conceptual sense &#8211; the electron is actually a part of the nucleus’s wave. The nucleus’s wave is used to convey information with a particle it desires to interact with. And exactly how may a nucleus interact in a physical way with another particle? How may it ‘move’ the world around it.? This movement of the world will require more than mere talking. The electron is there to make movement of the world around the nucleus – possible! The nucleus simply is telling its electron to move its rear over and be a part of another atom. We are talking about a lot of stuff happening here – that is not conveyed or summarized simply in any one wave function!</p>



<p>So: Superpositions. Well, One cannot observe the location of a particle and its velocity at the same time. So: We simply take a lot of ‘pictures’ of it – sometimes the location, sometimes the velocity and then we simply record all of our observations on one sheet of paper which thereby and therewith has encapsulated a summary of observed particle positions and velocities. Not certainly an exhaustive list – yet enough points to give us a satisfactory idea of this particle and its motion. Physicist then think: Well, People can now understand why we fellows and gals feel that we do not need a wave function for each of the particles involved &#8211; we simply think that we physicists require only one function wherein whereat these wave overlap and are sharing information. Boy: When one really sits down and writes all of this out – all of this exercise begins to seem very dubious. .</p>



<p>Again: Black Holes and Gravity. News bulletin: In 2016 – researchers at the LIGO and Virgo gravitational wave observatories announced the first direct detection of gravitational waves, created when Black Holes over a billion light years away &#8211; spiraled into each other.</p>



<p>But the planets in our solar system are much smaller, and move more slowly than those Black Holes, which were each more than thirty times the mass of the sun. As a result, the emitted gravitational waves from our planetary neighbors are very weak indeed. The power emitted in gravitational waves by the orbiting Earth amounts to about 200 watts – equivalent to the output of a few lightbulbs, and completely insignificant compared to other influences such as solar radiation and tidal forces. Tidal forces are not caused by lunar gravity?</p>



<p>So: Are photons carried along by electromagnetic waves &#8211; or vice-versa? Our hypothesis is: Moving particles generate waves. So why would Light particles take off by themselves into outer space? Perhaps they are sent by Hydrogen atoms &#8211; for example- to communicate with atoms far far away. Perhaps they have encrypted messages for when they impact other particles. They certainly have Energy. They cause plants to grow.</p>



<p>.</p>



<p>Uncertainty and Entanglement</p>



<p>Okay: So we think we have quantum mechanics pretty well under control now except for two sections found in most text books &#8211; one called ‘Uncertainty’ and the other ‘Entanglement.’ If we just assert our hypothesis concerning particles and fields and how the former utilize the latter in moving instructions, orders, information among them &#8211; then everything sorts out very easily. We think for these two subjects the same is True. When it comes to complementarity and Uncertainty – well, all the examples in books we have read are talking about like two electrons and how it is impossible locate where particles are and fields are. Well, the fact is we don’t need to know where a particle is located or its motion – we just need to understand that the information we are seeking is not like those two things. The information we need to know is what how when where information is conveyed from a nucleus of an atom to its electrons and to other atoms. Knowing the location of things does not help us at all. We need to know the language these entities are using and what instructions are conveyed and obeyed. And as far as entanglement is concerned: Texts are always talking about A and B as both being electrons – that each has a field – their fields become ‘entangled’. Incredible amounts of information is supposedly exchanged at great distances. All of this is happening &#8211; when fields ae actually designed to move information between nuclei and their electrons and other atoms. Whether one’s quarks are up or down or whatever has nothing to do with the information that is moved between particles and their electrons.</p>



<p>Also &#8211; very simply: Electrons don’t talk to each other. Their fields are never entangled. That is why they are located in quantified locations within the shells of an atom. They communicate only with their nuclei and with nuclei that they will call a new home. Such communication is perfunctory and calls for a low level of Consciousness. Electrons are able to receive orders and respond – they don’t have the level of Consciousness necessary to do more than that. Hydrogen nuclei are very intelligent. Helium atoms are created by Hydrogen ones they possess two Black Holes which circulate around ech other and so are cut off the world around them. All other atoms are Created by Hydrogen atoms with help from the Higgs field. All of the rest of the Periodic Table possesses Consciousness of a secondary type &#8211; a higher level than electrons &#8211; but still -very poor &#8211; like soldiers – compared to the Hydrogen nuclei commanders. As we keep saying &#8211; when one concentrates on information &#8211; like particle position and movement: One is neglecting what is most important here &#8211; the information shared among nuclei and electrons.</p>



<p>The Science of ‘Looking Out’</p>



<p>As we say: There is a Hydrogen ion in charge of your Brain. All of physics starts with this one thing: You are ‘Looking Out!’ If something in physics does not make sense – just remember that the answer in every case comes from the act of remembering – of what your Brain probably did – a moment ago!. Physics is involved in your every act of – ‘Looking Out!’ Your Brain perceives. What do think is doing this perceiving? Your Hydrogen ion perceives by means of a wave that is attached to it. That ion is then equipped with the ability to think. This ability to think is equipped with a memory to assist in this act. There are certain acts that are a bit automatic. Memory can be a bit mechanical for most particles. Yet the potential is always there for – Decisions. Even in Life that is ruled by instinct – Life endures because particles can perceive, think and then take Action! Humans pride themselves on possessing the ability to create new thoughts. Yet most of our Lives are routinized. Much is out of our control – controlled by particles within us that are we are not aware of – particles that capable within their own jurisdiction to perceive, think, and then act. Every one of our cells has two Hydrogen ions in charge – one within the cell in the centrosome and the other in the cell wall for external communications and intercellular interaction. Plants don’t even have one ion in charge. It operates every moment by means of clusters of cells working together for extended minutes together. The octopus is an example of an animal which has one ion in charge – yet each of its arms may act independently each with its own ion dictating the action.</p>



<p>Conclusion</p>



<p>So we have a magnet. We place it under a sheet of paper like our Granny did when we were six. She placed iron filings on the paper and then showed us how the filings displayed a certain pattern. We could see: The magnet possessed a field. It appears as if this field was Powerful enough to configure the filings. You and we now know differently: The Power is obviously in the magnet. A field obviously exists but it is merely conveying instructions from the particles in the magnet to the individual filings as to how each should align itself upon the paper – vis-à-vis the position of the magnet. It is at moments like this when we were children that we receive wrong information about the non-microscopic world.</p>



<p>So: In classical Newton physics the emphasis is upon information – the type that exists for objects around us. This in the end constitutes mainly the idea of ‘measurement’. If you can measure amounts of water, and degrees of heat one can make a boiler and move the world. In quantum mechanics physicists think they have a 600 page book of Magic – 600 pages of mathematical formulas that tell one exactly how one can use particles to move the world. One problem: A problem that involves something that one cannot measure. This is the measurement at this minute at a non-microscopic level – well, physicists are looking for the wrong – type – of information. When you think: No one has a ruler next to your head. This is because measurement of neural activity gives no idea of the ideas that might spew forth from such an organ at any second. An entity with Consciousness simply is working with a different kind of information. It is a type that tells one how one might move the world – not how the world might move you,. This is a level &#8211; a kind of information &#8211; that physicists have never thought to seek. Not from a particle!</p>



<p>So: Let us talk a little about what we are actually doing. Before quantum mechanics &#8211; the world had been used to working meeting demands like those required by industrial revolution. When quantum mechanics struck &#8211; we were no longer working with simply boiling water and moving locomotives. We were working with I-phones, making chips full of transistors that were smaller and smaller wherein and wherewith speed could be accelerated – more could be done with more and more transistors in one place in close connection. Now &#8211; we cannot get smaller. Sorry! So &#8211; are we still aiming for more speed? What is our aim now that that strategy has been exhausted? We need Power – whatever that might mean. We still need to get a lot done. When we were moving locomotives – well, we worked in aggregates – lots of atoms at once – heated them all at once – got them to work in lockstep – all those particles issuing the same orders in their wave functions their electrons trotting off to impact the world around them in the same way. Now we are working at a non-microscopic level. We are not trying to get electricity to move faster and faster in smaller and smaller devices. Electricity works with 1s and 0s &#8211; a very cumbersome way of thinking. What if we could persuade a lot of particles to do stuff directly without electricity involved at all.</p>



<p>There is no such thing as the position of the electron. There is only the particle’s wave function. Same idiot speaking. But – again -: we rejoin: There is a particle – it moves – in so moving it generates a wave. The wave may not be used yet. It is used only if information is to be sent. By whom? By the actor that we are supposed to ignore: The particle!</p>



<p>The particle precedes the existence of the wave! It generates the wave, it utilizes the wave. And we are supposed to ignore this particle! What have physicists been doing for the past 100 years?! One becomes furious at so little that has been done – at so great an expense!</p>



<p>Let us underscore one thing we have said before:</p>



<p>At this point: No consideration of where, what, why, or any other aspect of any particle is displayed either in any text or any equations that might be offered to the reader. We are simply left with fields – actually just places – of interest – which of course slip easily into a discussion and physics of merely two things: Time and Space. Good Work Einstein! Everything has surreptitiously slipped into a completely Cartesian consideration. All of this is very convenient of course – it would be very embarrassing if someone not thoroughly schooled in a physicist’s manner of thinking might innocently ask: But why – does anything happen? Without particles – there are simply no actors present – to take that action</p>



<p>Thank you – and Good Night!</p>



<p>THE END</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed aligncenter is-type-rich is-provider-amazon wp-block-embed-amazon"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Quantum Mechanics, Black Holes, and the Furure Looking at Physics - from the Inside Out" type="text/html" width="317" height="476" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen style="max-width:100%" src="https://read.amazon.com/kp/card?preview=inline&#038;linkCode=kpd&#038;ref_=k4w_oembed_isfapUdlX9jLGG&#038;asin=B0DDJZFF3T&#038;tag=kpembed-20"></iframe>
</div></figure>



<p>Bibliography</p>



<p>Al-Khalili, Jim, <em>Blackholes, and Time Machines, Second Edition</em></p>



<p>(Boca Raton, Florida: CP.C Press, 2012), 184 pp.</p>



<p>Al-Khalili, Jim, <em>The World According to Physics </em>(Princeton: Princeton</p>



<p>University Press, 2020), 313 pp.</p>



<p>Ananthaswamy, Anil, <em>The Edge of Physics – A Journey to Earth’s</em></p>



<p><em>Extremes to Unlock the Secrets of the Universe </em>(New York:</p>



<p>Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2010), 322 pp.</p>



<p>Carroll, Sean, <em>The Biggest Ideas in the Universe – Space, Time, and</em></p>



<p><em>Motion </em>(New York: Dutton, 2022), 296 pp.</p>



<p>Carroll, Sean, <em>Something Deeply Hidden – Quantum Worlds and the</em></p>



<p><em>Emergence of Spacetime </em>(New York: Dutton, 2020), 347 pp.</p>



<p>Greene, Brian, <em>The Hidden Reality – Parallel Universes and the Deep</em></p>



<p><em>Laws of the Cosmos </em>(New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2011), 370 pp.</p>



<p>Lin, Thomas, <em>Alice and Bob Meet the Wall of Fire – The Biggest Ideas in</em></p>



<p><em>Science </em>(Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2018) 308 pp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://cftheater.info/blog/quantum-mechanics-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE I- Building a Cosmic Theology</title>
		<link>https://cftheater.info/blog/the-i-building-a-cosmic-theology/</link>
					<comments>https://cftheater.info/blog/the-i-building-a-cosmic-theology/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 16:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mini Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Building a Cosmic Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minibook]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftheater.info/blog/?p=1538</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[THE I Building a Cosmic Theology by Frank W. Andres © Copyright Frank W. Andres 2924. All right Reserved. Fire Mountain Publishing 4075 Vineyard Ave. Pleasanton, CA 9566 Please visit&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="has-text-align-center"></p>


<div class="wp-block-image is-style-rounded">
<figure class="alignleft size-full is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="460" height="276" src="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Jean-Jacques-Rousseau-011.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-1539" style="width:290px;height:auto" srcset="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Jean-Jacques-Rousseau-011.jpg 460w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Jean-Jacques-Rousseau-011-300x180.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 460px) 100vw, 460px" /></figure>
</div>

<div class="wp-block-image is-style-rounded">
<figure class="alignright size-full is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="597" height="771" src="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Carl-Jung.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-1540" style="width:180px;height:auto" srcset="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Carl-Jung.jpg 597w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Carl-Jung-232x300.jpg 232w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 597px) 100vw, 597px" /></figure>
</div>

<div class="wp-block-image is-style-rounded">
<figure class="alignright size-full is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="1024" src="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/James-Joyce-Portrait.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-1542" style="width:197px;height:auto" srcset="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/James-Joyce-Portrait.jpg 1024w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/James-Joyce-Portrait-300x300.jpg 300w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/James-Joyce-Portrait-150x150.jpg 150w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/James-Joyce-Portrait-768x768.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
</div>

<div class="wp-block-image is-style-rounded">
<figure class="alignleft size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="755" height="1024" src="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Nietzsche187a-755x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-1541" style="width:173px;height:auto" srcset="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Nietzsche187a-755x1024.jpg 755w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Nietzsche187a-221x300.jpg 221w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Nietzsche187a-768x1042.jpg 768w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Nietzsche187a-1132x1536.jpg 1132w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Nietzsche187a.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 755px) 100vw, 755px" /></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">THE <em>I</em></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Building a Cosmic Theology</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">by</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Frank W. Andres</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">© Copyright Frank W. Andres 2924. All right Reserved.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Fire Mountain Publishing</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">        4075 Vineyard Ave. Pleasanton, CA 9566</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Please visit our website at CFTheater. Info.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Please communicate with us via the following Email</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center"><a href="mailto:frankandres@MyYahoo.com">frankandres@MyYahoo.com</a>.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Introduction</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">The <em>I.</em></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">What is this <em>I </em>? We know a few things about this &#8211; because we have abilities that most scientists do not possess. These abilities are inadvertently screened out. But these abilities allow us to create syntheses. We can take 12 disciplines – pose questions concerning certain topics from 12 different directions – and from the answers obtain Truth. This Truth as opposed to analytical, deductive thought – does not yield certainty – only probability. Yet the probability of our Truth being True is somewhere near 99.99 percent. So what do we know using these abilities?</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Well: In the Beginning &#8211; there was the <em>I . </em>We know its attributes: Will, Love, Truth, Beauty, and Justice. We know what it is: It is a Hydrogen ion. It possesses Consciousness. The Hydrogen ion possesses a Black Hole. It possesses a tremendous amount of Energy. This Energy is perceived by us – as Consciousness. This Consciousness possesses a tremendous amount of Power – a tremendous amount of capability when it comes to impacting the world around it. We are not aware of how much Power we actually have. Our mothers have diverted our attention to the world around us. Existentialism is a philosophy that is focused upon this tremendous potential Energy that we all possess – but are unable to access readily. That is – as we say: This is because we have been taught to think a certain way. Our mothers instinctively know: The <em>I</em> is dangerous. There is a slippery slope. We can easily fall into narcissism, egotism, self-preoccupation. Or worse: We may think we are a God. Better to possess a social <em>I</em> &#8211; then we will not be threatening to anyone.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">In philosophy certain philosophers have been concerned with the Cosmic aspects brought to our Lives by the Hydrogen ion that is in charge of each of our Brains. Plato was the first to finely delineate these aspects of a person’s personality. Instinctively he understood that our psychic possesses attributes that are of Cosmic importance: Will, Love, Truth, Beauty, and Justice. But his work was largely forgotten until we got to the work of: The Existentialists. In particular: Friedrich Nietzsche. Nietzsche was interested in the Power that the Hydrogen ion brings to our Lives but is too often overlooked and is UnderUsed. We are talking about: The Cosmic Power of the Will. Nietzsche called this: The Will to Power!</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">The Will has been utilized by human societies in the past &#8211; it is present in the works of the shamans who practiced a world-wide religion that began some 60,000 years ago when humans ventured far North &#8211; into Arctic regions. In this frigid clime humans who were right hemispheric dominant in their brain as their forebearers – the apes – are – in order to survive &#8211; presented the Earth with the first humans that were left hemispheric dominant. With this side of the brain came the ability to deduce, be analytical, develop written language, and invent religion. They also developed critical tools such as the wheel, fire, the horse. Their religion – shamanism &#8211; acknowledged and indeed even attempted to utilize the Powers of the <em>I . T</em>his theology ultimately evolved into occult practices such as alchemy, the horoscope, Magic, Spirit Dreams. In a modern world such ideas have been outright banned.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">In this process humans have lost the Power of the Will.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Well, we have been reading a book: <em>Age of Anger – A History of the Present,</em> by Pankaj Mishra. We first read this book 8 years (2017) ago. Still the ideas in this book have hung in our head all this time. Mishra’s thesis is: The 19<sup>th</sup> Century was a time of Terror. Actually this time seems to have started for him with the ‘revolutions’ of 1848. Well, of course there was the Reign of Terror which was an official phase in the sequence of events that occurred as part of the French Revolution. However, it wasn’t until 1848 that Terror became part of a wider European phenomenon. The century was half gone at that point. The thing is: Terrorist sort of actions have long been explained as examples of bizarre, irrational, neurotic &#8211; perhaps even psychotic behavior. Mr. Mishra never even considers these as possible sources for the violence that was witnessed at that time. He sees these acts as being very rational and perhaps even admirable works with a positive bent. He sees these acts as a very understandable and even natural reaction to events that were occurring at the world level at that time. Reading this book: A whole lot of different ideas came crashing together into a synthesis &#8211; in our minds.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">So: 1848. Well, obviously Great Britain had experienced and then the U.S was experiencing: Industrial Revolution.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">R<em>essentiment. </em>Rousseau never used thIs word – however, he wrote extensively about how upper classes could provoke anger and envy among those less fortunate who have been deemed unworthy of aristocratic attention. Kierkegaard first used the term in his book, <em>The Present Age </em>(1846) to note that the 19<sup>th</sup> century was marked by a particular kind of envy, which is incited when people consider themselves as equals yet seek advantage over each other. Mishra feels that this word describes the main sentiment which arose throughout much of continental Europe during the last half of the 19<sup>th</sup> century. As we say: This feeling of being left behind &#8211; began in earnest in a small part of Europe &#8211; with the French Revolution when France obviously was responding to the half century of economic development which had occurred previously in Great Britain. France was immediately spurred into action – to kick off the old forms of government they had inherited from the Dark Ages – embolden by the successful revolt of the American colonies against their ruler: Great Britain. By 1848 even the fledgling U.S. could now be seen as a country ready to explode economically. Continental Europe saw itself as being left in the dust. This led supposedly to the Revolutions of 1848 when all sorts of people in various countries rose up against governments entrenched in the past. With no success. Nationalism was supposedly a necessary prerequisite for development. After these futile uprisings &#8211; continental Europe was still left in shattered pieces of the Dark Ages. These defeats led to Karl Marx and Friedrich Nietzsche along with a host of others who began to advocate violence as the only remedy and hope for a Future in continental Europe.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">We have always seen this book to be important. We just didn’t know how its ideas would fit in with our studies. Now we can see these things:</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">First, 1848 is not the most critical date here. 1859 is! Charles Darwin is the major reason for the violence that occurred in the second half of the nineteenth century. Reading Darwin is when Nietzsche realized that God – was Truly Dead. No God. No Morality. Violence suddenly became not only an attractive – but now an ethically, morally neutral action – and therefore now a necessary remedy for rectifying things quickly. So: There now were two impetuses for this violence: Darwin and Industrial Revolution. As we say: Mishra feels that the word <em>ressentiment </em>describes the main sentiment which existed in Europe during this half of the century. There definitely was a feeling of being left behind. We have suddenly realized what this minibook is really all about.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Second: An <em>Age of Anger</em>. As we say: It is tempting to view this period of time – this period which actually was filled with Terrorism – as some sort of mental illness. And of course such sickness Truly played a part. But there seems to be more to all of this. Something that Mr. Mishra seems to have instinctively seen to be True.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">This Truth is related to: The <em>I .</em></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">The Search for the <em>I</em></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">The <em>I .</em> Again: What are we talking about?</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Let us go into this subject – a little more.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Well, in each of us: There is something ‘looking out’. This is Consciousness. Consciousness is a concept that scientists are not allowed to talk about. We think the time is ripe for this prohibition to be lifted.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">We took our first steps towards the <em>I </em>in our minibook on Existentialism. In that minibook we encountered the Social <em>I</em> : The<em> I</em></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">our mothers created for us. This is to be distinguished – differentiated -from the Cosmic <em>I </em>that we were born with. Plato was well aware of this Cosmic Consciousness. As we say: He listed its attributes as being – as its possessing: Will, Love, Truth, Beauty, and Justice. Every particle in the universe possesses Consciousness and so possesses – these attributes – naturally – automatically – eternally.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">So – it was: The Social <em>I – </em>began to be created at the moment of our birth – at our mother’s beast. The concepts of morality, of common sense, and especially the dynamics and rules of the Herd – were all inculcated, embedded in our primal memory in those first moments – in those first days and years – fed to us along with the nourishment of our mother’s breast milk. We in those moments, days, years were taught how to Live – that is, how to survive – in a World that is designed to Kill, slaughter, to Eat every one of us. Our mothers were not working from scratch. They were working with tiny bits of ‘truths’ that have been implanted in each of our cells. Programmed into every Blue Print of genes in every cell in our bodies is a number one fact – the number one Force of Importance: The Will to Survive. That is: The Will &#8211; for the Survival – of the Species. This fact is so very important because one other fact is very True: All Life eats each other. In this way – all Life is predicated upon &#8211; Death. The Hydrogen ions that created us – had to have a strategy therefore – If Life was to survive.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">This strategy – the wherewithal that allows Life to survive – these Hydrogen ions imprinted into the Blueprints of the genes that exist in every cell in our bodies. Cosmic Truth resides in the Hydrogen ion that is in charge of our brains – but all cells in our bodies present Truths that are different – these are the Truths that our mothers start working with, start reinforcing, allowing these Truths to unfold and blossom forth to take over each of our Lives. As we say: All of this is in contradiction to a set of Cosmic – real – Truths – that reside naturally in every one of us – in our<em> I </em>s . Most animals are equipped with instincts which hold foremost control over their Lives. Therefore, animals do not fear Death. They are only focused upon: Survival – no matter what. Only humans possess thought processes that take one into Dangerous territories. Unto Murder: Which is the taking of Life beyond what is required for Survival. Unto Fear of Death: A Positive Striving for Survival is transformed into a Fear of the Unknown – of the Extinguishment of Life. The Extinguishment of the <em>I. </em>An extinguishment which is in actuality: Impossible. In the Cosmic Sphere: All particles are – Eternal</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Thus: The Striving for Survival is a Striving built into our genetics – into the Blueprints that are in each cell – that provide patterns for the perpetuation of Life. There is in this way – by this means: A Striving built into our mind – to Survive – or at least for our Species – to Survive.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Yes – there are moments of Pleasure – of Seduction – Impregnation – Birth – Nourishment – and Protection. But in the end: All must die. Either be Eaten or just simply – fall apart. All Forces – All Human Will – is directed towards something greater than the individual – an Eternal Existence of a sort – well, as eternal as a Life on Earth may provide.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Freud amd Pscyhoanalytical Theory</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">So: Terrorism – and sickness. Was the nineteenth century a very sick century as well as very economically successful one? As we say: Mr. Mishra thinks not. It is True, however that there was enough disturbance of these types to warrant the emergence of an entirely new field affiliated with psychology: Freud and his psychoanalytical therapy. What does Freud have to say about the <em>I </em>?</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">So: We were reading the second volume of a two volume set written by Carl Jung and his assistant: <em>Analytical Psychology.</em> This title is supposed to set his ideas apart from his mentor Sigmund Freud – who said that his practice was ‘psychoanalysis’. The difference seems to be the fact that Jung actually entertained ideas from the occult &#8211; although his discipline never really allowed him to officially make any declarations about this proposed relationship. He simply laid out what he found in dialogs with patients that may or not have had relevance to this relationship. He would leave further steps to people like us – who would come after him who might have the advantage of having more data from experiments. We have read many books by and about both Freud and Jung. Volume II in this set is the first time we encounter ideas concerning the occult and the Will.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">As we say: We have people who are right hemispheric dominant – so we also have the advantage of being able to work with 12 disciplines at once and which means that we are working with a different discipline than most people are – which is essentially: Everything – well, it does not require absolute certainty. 99.99 percent plausibility is enough. As we say: We have use of another side of the brain – a side that academia inadvertently – screens out. .</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">So: Freud felt that sex was the most important part of the mind that governed all things – and thus was most important in curing or at least dealing with mental illness. Jung believed differently. He felt that there was an ‘element’ which he called ‘Power’ which was being neglected.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">We have a hypothesis: We believe that every brain has a Hydrogen ion in charge. Thus every animal has two aspects: First – there is the ‘animal’ or ‘Life’ aspect which was created by gradients &#8211; that is &#8211; groups of.hydrogen ions in ocean waters 4 billion years ago. Second &#8211; There is the <em>I – </em>there is the Cosmic aspect – possessed by the Hydrogen ions themselves &#8211; ‘looking out’.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">The fact is: Hydrogen is very scarce on Earth. These account for only 2 percent of all atoms. In the rest of the Cosmos Hydrogen atoms and Helium that it is slowly transforming into; both together account for 99.3 percent of the atoms in the universe.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Earth is Truly an anomaly! Hydrogen is found only in water – that is &#8211; the oceans and any water that may fall from the heavens onto land – and it is found &#8211; in Life. Of course this is because Life was created in the oceans. All Life possesses molecules that are encrusted with hydrogen atoms. This is to be expected: Life was created from H2O and CO2. Yes – that’s right!: All Life is composed of Sugar! – plus a little this and that. Thus: All Life is composed of two things: First, things that are Life and are made of sugar – and second, things that are Cosmic – there is always a Hydrogen ion somewhere in every cell, sometimes in charge of an entire entity – that is: Sometimes there is one Hydrogen ion in charge of many others that are located in the cells.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">As we say: When hydrogen ions created Life – they did something very Powerful &#8211; they implanted a Blueprint in every living cell. A Blueprint that must be followed every time a cell reproduces itself. In the Blueprint one critical piece is always present – there is always a mechanism by which the cell, and then group of cells in an organism can work together to reproduce themselves. This mechanism is called ‘sex’.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Sigmund Freud believed that sex was not only important but that it possessed a ‘Power’ called the ‘libido’. It is able to influence an animal’s total behavior. Most animals operate with many things happening automatically – this is called ‘instinct’ Man and woman have some aspects of their Lives operating automatically – but in their case there is a wide range that is more under the control of the Hydrogen ion in charge – by means of a Power called: Consciousness. In all animals there is an <em>I</em> ‘looking out’. In the case of man and woman: this <em>I </em>is &#8211; in command: That is, there is a wide range of behavior that humans control that is not under the control of instinct. Humans are able to use their minds – to think. Humans have the ability to perceive the movement of objects external to them – and not respond in an automatic – instinctual way. Instead: Man and woman are able to perceive, think, and then act in accordance with their own decisions.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">So just like other animals &#8211; in Man and Woman there are two levels: There is the body which is Life animal Earth – which is controlled by the constraints and mechanisms in the Blueprints in each cell. And there is the Hydrogen ion which brings information and Laws of its own – whose ultimate origin is from the Cosmos. Every particle in the Cosmos every spark of Energy brings an electromagnetic wave which conveys information from the Cosmos: Will, Love, Truth, Beauty, and Justice.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">The sexual aspects of Life are connected to the Love parts of the Hydrogen particles waves. In an electromagnetic wave &#8211; Love is related to the magnetic, connecting power. In Life it is expressed by means of the genes in reproduction. Sex thus is a Life thing and is thus only a partial Truth. There is no sex in the rest of the Cosmos. It is an Earth thing – however, like everything in Life &#8211; it is ultimately itself plugged into Cosmic attributes &#8211; from whence all Power and initiation comes.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Analytical Psychology</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center"><em>So</em>: We have this book,<em> Analytical Psychology</em> &#8211; which is a Xeroxed copy written by Jung and his assistant Constance E. Long. So: The first volume as we have said – well, no one ever considered copying it recently. Probably because it has all the expected stuff. We think even Jung felt the second volume somehow contained very special stuff. We were turned in this direction by James Joyce. The latter actually was very ambitious in his goals. The sad ending is: Nothing much came of his work at least in an alchemic way. It may turn out that his main contribution was to steer readers into more productive directions. Joyce &#8211; all that gibberish – in two books: ‘Ulysses’ and ‘Finnegans Wake’. Well, in alchemy you are able to make gold out of excrement. The problem with these books: Where is the Gold!? In our Music: Well we did it! We used the piano as a laboratory bench to conduct experiments and: We did it!!! We actually and physically utilized alchemic principles – and we found: Gold!</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">But now the next step: The <em>I .</em> Joyce mentions both Niettzsche and Jung. And Jung in this second volume talks a lot about Nietzsche. And Nietzsche &#8211; is the one person who really stared the <em>I </em>right in the face.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">We forget that we are in a privileged position: Back in 1916 when Jung wrote the book we are reading: Scientists and psychologists believed &#8211; well, even the ones who are operating today for that matter – well, they still believe that the unConscious comes first and the Conscious is somehow built on top of that. Well, in a way this seems to make sense: A rock possesses no Consciousness, bacteria little, animals are a debatable matter – although for some reason even today – scientists are reluctant to give Consciousness to anyone &#8211; save – a human being. We on the other hand because of our unique position of having access to 12 disciplines at once &#8211; are able to make a synthesis from all of these perspectives and experiments combined: Well, we are simply 99.99 percent certain that every particle in the universe – possesses Consciousness. We know: Hydrogen &#8211; and Helium which the former ultimately forms &#8211; together comprise 99.3 percent of the universe. The rest of the periodic table is made from Hydrogen by means of the Higgs field. Hydrogen has more Power than it appears because there is a Black Hole in the center of each. Most atoms have a nucleus that if it were the size of a ping pong ball it would weight 32 tons! Hydrogen has most of its weight – hidden! It possesses even more. A lot more.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">We know: Every brain has a Hydrogen ion in charge of it. This ion regardless of what Living thing it is a part of – possesses a tremendous amount of Consciousness. Consciousness is how we experience the Energy that exists in our <em>I . </em>Consciousness is Truly the first Source of movement in the universe. We know what our <em>I</em> is: It is a Hydrogen ion. We have no ideas what Consciousness really is. It obviously possesses Power. Well, it possesses all the Cosmic virtues of: Will, Love, Truth, Beauty, and Justice. So &#8211; in each piece of dust there exists an <em>I </em>. If this piece of dust is aLive &#8211; then there is also a small to large Brain augmenting that.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">We think this whole second volume of Jung is actually directed toward something a True scientist is not really allowed to waste time on: The <em>I . </em>Our hypothesis is: This second volume is actually devoted to &#8211; Consciousness. What is it? Jung has no idea about that. He can only observe what the <em>I </em>does indirectly. Well, he is a psychiatrist: He can sort of aim his questions and interactions with his patients in certain directions. Well, they are deemed to be sick – so of course he is helping them. But as the volume progresses it appears to us who come from years of thinking about the <em>I </em>– well, we are led to believe that he is actually trying to collect empirical evidence that possibly can be used by other people in the future to find out exactly what the <em>I</em> is – physically in the Brain. We know a lot of stuff that he didn’t: That Consciousness is how Energy works. We know that it is of Cosmic importance and presence. Consciousness is how Energy is experienced by a self. We are ‘looking out’. Well, hydrogen ions created Life. These ions were sneaky: They used chemicals at hand &#8211; CO2 and H2O &#8211; to make sugar. This sugar has a structure that allows one hydrogen ion to be in charge and to be expressed. And it must be able to reproduce.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Okay so: Jung. He knew that for Freud – sex was most important. But Jung and we know: Sex is a Life thing. It is not a Cosmic thing. The <em>I </em>really doesn’t care about sex organs. So what is: Really important to the <em>I </em>? The <em>I &#8211; </em>operating without Brain without Life: Is left with primarily what is essential to the <em>I</em>. A patient can be normal. He or she can be ‘sick’ to various degrees with various ailments. How does The <em>I </em>operate in a normal person. How is the <em>I </em>involved with Dreams? Well, Freud was interested in Dreams. Not so much about the <em>I </em>. So Jung takes another look. Forget sex as we say: The <em>I </em>is interested more – in what!? Well Nietzsce thought: Power! Well, the first thought that comes to us is: Well, Hydrogen ions created Life – so that must have taken Power. But it took several <em>I </em>sworking together to do anything – without the help of a Brain. Still just this fact leads us to other Truths”: They somehow knew that making Life was possible – they knew somehow how to do it – so things like this must be going on all the time somewhere else – right now. We shall consider these ideas in a subsequent minibook.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Well, these thought lead from what we know. Jung had no such knowledge. But what he did know – was puzzling enough for him.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">What Jung did know is: There is something in our head – that is ‘looking out’. We have a tendency – no, we were carefully taught by someone probably our mother &#8211; to ignore this fact and concentrate on Living. Nietzsche dedicated his whole Life to staring this <em>I</em> right in the face! Jung says: ‘Well, OK but I am not a philosopher – well, he calls Nietzsche a ‘poet’. Well, what is one to do with one so crazy? So what can a psychiatrist do? Well, ask questions and write in detail the answers that are given. The important thing here is obviously: The questions asked. In the first volume evidently he asked the normal questions of all patients. In the second – he asks questions like: Is this a normal patient or not. Exactly what is his or her condition? Different conditions produce different information about the <em>I </em>. Normal people have Dreams. So we look at these Dreams in a way different from what Freud did. People have epileptic ‘fits’. People have hallucinations. Perhaps schizophrenia is actually a malfunctioning of the <em>I </em>. First off: There seems to be two ‘persons’ in a personality at all times. So multipersonalities? Well, what if this difference is actually related to the <em>I </em>working with brain and then the <em>I</em> working without brain to various degrees. People can be hypnotized. People can be on drugs. People can be asleep and dream. People can have a susceptiblity to going into ‘trances’ &#8211; that is &#8211; go into a dream state when certain things around them occur. Now we are talking about something that we know quite a lot about: Shamanism.. These ‘mystics’ &#8211; as they are called &#8211; and their practices are well known. And their ‘art’ is related to what is called ‘Magic’ &#8211; to what we call ‘occult’ &#8211; to what we call ‘alchemy’. Now: We know about all of these things – and we know that these things &#8211; including what Jung is doing &#8211; are all part of the investigation of The <em>I </em>. All of this is also related to Eastern religions. The Tao. All sort of things.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">So in this minibook: Let us see what Jung found out.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">So: Freud and Jung – let us cut to the chase: In the human Brain there are two types of unConsciousness. First: The hydrogen ion can turn off. This happens to each of us every night – so every hydrogen atom in the universe must experience the same thing. Then the human Brain – can turn off. That isn’t really right – the Brain doesn’t turn off: It just is separated physically from the hydrogen ion in a functional way – so &#8211; as far as the ion is concerned &#8211; the Brain is turned off. In sleep both are turned off. In dreaming: The hydrogen ion is on and the Brain – well, different parts of it &#8211; are off – depending. What we mean is: The ion can position itself such that it can tap into memory but not the rest of the brain. What we mean is: All perceptions and thoughts are conveyed to the <em>I</em> by means of neural passageways. These ‘dump’ their information for the <em>I </em>in the immediate vicinity of the <em>I </em>. The <em>I</em> is able to receive a prodigious amount of information in a short length of time. It normally receives information from all sources in the Brain – well, sequentially – in split seconds &#8211; at the same time. The ion can be ‘off’. The Brain can be ‘off’. What that really means is: The ion may be awake when a person’s Brain is asleep &#8211; such that it receives information only from memory. The memory seems to be always ‘next door’ – it seems to be readily and easily accessed – if an ion is around to do that. It has already been created – it doesn’t require additional Consciousness to maintain its presence. In hypnosis: The Brain is off, generally &#8211; but selected parts may be accessed in response to the hypnotist’s words and gestures. Physical experiments must be done. The hydrogen ion is in a vacant space in the Brain called the Pineal area. It can move a billionth of an inch this way or that &#8211; such that its field can receive information from different parts of the Brain via different neural highways.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">So: The Consciousness in the particles in a rock are not apparent because these atoms have many electrons surrounding them – plus every particle is in a larger molecule. As a consequence &#8211; for most inanimate objects: Consciousness just doesn’t seem to exist. Hydrogen is different: First &#8211; each has only one electron. Second – In stars and in water – they tend to move in clouds of ions &#8211; with no electrons to shut off their Power. In organic molecules – which are mostly sugar – hydrogen atoms encrust them – they possess enough awareness to help identify shapes of surrounding molecules. Shape in the case of Living things is Crucial &#8211; as we say: their structures are made of the same composition – the same chemistry – Sugar! So their shape is the only way they can be identified. In this way: Hydrogen atoms are crucial to organic chemistry.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Age of Anger</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">What is good? Everything that heightens the feeling of Power in man, the Will to Power, Power itself. What is happiness? The feeling that Power is growing: That resistance is overcome. Not contentedness but of Power; not peace but War – not mere health &#8211; but fitness.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">What is Truth for Nietzsche? What is more harmful than any vice? Active pity for all the failures and all the weak: Christianity.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Rousseau’s prickly Genevan’s alienation from the Enlightenment philosophers’ cosmopolitan salons witnesses – the outsider’s severe isolation in the world of wealth, privilege, competition and vanity that seeded Rousseau’s often contradictory ideas and solutions. These are found in many people in the past – and in people in modernity. There were the German Romantics &#8211; their intellectual, cultural, and political fecund <em>ressentiment</em> of France. There is the alienated young man of promise who appears in all modernizing countries speaking on behalf of a illiterate majority, the educated minority, or himself – a self that tuns out to be painfully divided. In all cases, he articulates a profound sense of inadequacy, and tries to draw an ambitious artificial – political &#8211; Blueprint to overcome it<em>. Age of Anger</em> simply assumes a busy background of nation-building, the uneven transformation of regional backwards and agricultural countries – into industrial and global economies, and the rise of mass politics and media. It describes a pattern of mental and emotional behavior as the landscape of modernity extended from the Atlantic West to Europe’s heartland, Russia and further East. Modern promise of equality collides with massive disparities of Power, education, status and property ownership.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">People with nothing – people without Power – have been introduced to an earth-shaking Idea: Human beings can use their own Reason &#8211; to fundamentally reshape their circumstances! They have found – their <em>I</em> !</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Nietzsche Revisited</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">We know what Nietzsche was talking about. We have Lived &#8211; what he is talking about – without his understanding much of what we have learned. He was right hemispheric dominant in his Brain. One of us possesses a 230 I.Q. on the only I.Q. test that tests the abilities of the right side of the Brain. Nietzsche is living a Life – and he is documenting every moment the best he can. But he does not realize that these are physiological, biological things here that he is talking about</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Well, the fact is: He is talking about two things:</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">First &#8211; he is talking about two sides of the Brain. Well, he was not the first to talk about this. Hegel devoted his whole life to this work – without realizing what he was doing. Hegel devoted his whole Life to making a Synthesis: A Synthesis which would embrace all of Thought. This Synthesis he would call: The Absolute. It would be a Universal type of Philosophy: It simply would comprise – All – of Thought.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Well, he succeeded. To Recount: Well, he found that there were a bunch of philosophers who thought that Truth was clear and distinct and logical and then there were those who thought that there was no certainty at all – everything is relative. The first were called ‘analytical’ and the second ‘inductive.’ Hegel took their work and tried to put them together in a conceptual way. As we have described elsewhere before – we took Hegel’s books and summed them up this way: There is perception, collection and then separation. And ultimately we understood that these processes are related to physiology – to biology! He was actually talking about the two sides of the brain! Each person is dominant in one side. Originally all humans were right side of the brain as apes are. But a few ventured far to the North into the Arctic and somehow they switched from right to left – mostly – as the left side was able to survive more easily in such a challenging climate. It is tempting to say that humans simply became smarter. But they weren’t dumb to begin with. We are talking about: Two different populations with different physiologies. They are simply better at different things. And then if they work together – POW! Lennon- McCartney!</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Second, Nietzsche is talking about something that all other philosophers have neglected completely. As we say: There is something inside your Brain – that is ‘looking out’. There is Consciousness. There is: The <em>I </em>! As we say: Our mothers are experts at diverting our attention – getting us to look at the world outside – become preoccupied with those things – neglect the fact that there is Magic – there is a miracle inside your brain. There is Consciousness!!!! Nietzsche did not know how/what part of the Brain was doing this – he just could not shake this knowledge off. It was always there right in front of him. It was True. It was frightening – sometimes.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">There is no way to know what Consciousness really is – other than it is Energy. And Consciousness is how our brain perceives Energy. This Energy has attributes: Will, Love, Truth, Beauty, justice. These attributes are Truth. Real Truth. Cosmic Truth. The rest of ‘truth’ is phony truth. It is stuff ingrained into our genes by Hydrogen ions that created us. That truth has only one purpose – only one way of looking at it and you are able to say: ‘Yep -That’s truth. That truth has only one purpose. To keep you aLive long enough to reproduce. Survival of the Species. Survival of that miracle – that Magic &#8211; that hydrogen ions somehow jimmied together. Like TinkerToys.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">We are simply going to translate Nietzsche’s words – using all of the knowledge we have of physics and physiology. One-third of our population is in trouble right now. They have a disability that is as challenging as autism or Down’s Syndrome. They are being left behind. This Truly is a waste. But more importantly – do you have any idea what will happen when these people are identified, educated in the proper way, and learn to work with people with left hemispheric dominance? POW! Lennon &#8211; McCartney!</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Building a Cosmic Theology</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">God is not Dead. Humans do need a religion. We have accomplished much of this work: We are creating a Cosmic Theology</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">So – let us recount: In the Beginning there was the <em>I . </em>We know its attributes: Will, Love, Truth, Beauty, and Justice. We know what it is: It is a Hydrogen ion. It possesses Consciousness. The Hydrogen ion possesses a Black Hole. It possesses a tremendous amount of Energy. This Energy is perceived by us – as Consciousness. This Consciousness possesses a tremendous amount of Power – a tremendous amount of capability when it comes to impacting the world around it. We are not aware of how much Power we actually have. Our mothers have diverted our attention to the world around us. Existentialism is a philosophy that is focused upon this tremendous potential Energy that we all possess – but are unable to access it readily. That is – as we say: Because we have been taught to think a certain way. Our mothers instinctively know: The <em>I</em> is dangerous. There is a slippery slope. We can easily fall into narcissism, egotism, self-preoccupation. Or worse: We may think we are a God. Better to possess a social <em>I</em> &#8211; then we will not be threatening to anyone.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">So there is the <em>I . </em>It is also called the ‘self’, the ‘ego’, For the right side of the Brain: There is ‘Geist’ – that is, ‘spirit’. This is an ability – a Power. It is the Power of Synthesis – making connections – making ‘breakthroughs’. It is what allows Zarathrustra – Nietzche’s OverMensche to arise and take command – if only for a few seconds. As we say: This is an ability that resides only in a person who is right hemispheric dominant. It is the Lightning that Zarathustra brings to the World.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">As we say: Morality is not Dead. It resides in the attributes of every particle in the universe. The Age of Nihilism – is Over! As we say: There is a piece of the Cosmos in each of our Brains. An <em>I</em> &#8211; is in charge! It is a Hydrogen ion. If we proceed carefully – we will be able to derive the fundamental tenets of a new Cosmic Theology. Along with this book of <em>Anger</em> &#8211; we are also looking at the works of James Joyce, Friedrich Nietzsche, alchemy, and shamanism. As Carl Jung realized: All of these are sources, evidence of Cosmic Truth. All of these things address the <em>I</em> that exists – in all of us.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">There are few Hydrogen atoms on Earth right now. They are found only in water and in Life. When the Earth was formed some 4.6 billion years ago: There were many Hydrogen atoms – because things were very hot – there actually were many Hydrogen ions &#8211; in the vicinity of the Earth. This was a time when the planets were tearing themselves away from the Sun. The sun which is composed of Hydrogen ions which are slowly converting into Helium atoms in its intense heat. The Hydrogen ions in the vicinity of the Earth combined with Oxygen to form water. And because there was an abundance of Cosmic Energy always present – these ions also were able to Create Life. H2O plus CO2 in the air plus Cosmic rays of Energy were used to create sugar: Which became the basic building block of Life. Sugar molecules were attached one to another like TinkerToys to create Life. Every particle in the Cosmos possesses Consciousness – that is &#8211; every particle in the Cosmos possesses an – <em>I</em> . One of these <em>I</em> s was placed in charge of every piece of Life – which always consisted of many molecules of sugar. These molecules of sugar were encrusted with hydrogen atoms – which were always partially ‘revealed’. With only one electron and with a Black Hole at its center – each hydrogen atom was always partially ‘revealed’ and able to communicate interact with the world around it. Sugar molecules are all the same. They possess approximately the same chemical composition. So: Each of these molecules had a little of this and that added to it – such that the hydrogen atoms that encrust every organic molecule are able to ascertain which sort of molecule it is addressing by ascertaining its shape.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Somehow these Hydrogen ions knew how to Create Life: This ability obviously leads to other questions which we will address in later minibooks.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">There are Laws of the Cosmos. However, there had to be different laws for Life – for it to survive on Earth. We mean of course: Particles in the Cosmos are eternal. Thus every part of Life is composed of particles that will exist forever. However, Life itself – that is, the bundles of particles that compose Life are not eternal. This is especially True because much of Life is created in such a way that it devours other Life. That is: Some Life consumes Light for/as Energy. All other Life then eats that initial Light-Energized Life. That is: Necessarily for Life – even for the Life that is consuming Light – but is eaten by all other forms of Life &#8211; there must exist the concept of – Death! Life thus on Earth is not Eternal. However, in its place must necessarily had been placed: The concept of Survival of the Species. Every speck of Life possesses a Blueprint that guides the reconstruction and replacement of every piece of Life that has been eaten – well, some Life simply discontinues because it finally just falls apart. Survival of a species becomes the one true law of Life. The Earthly law replaces – replicates in a partial manner &#8211; the Cosmic Law of eternal existence of Cosmic entities.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">But some may say: A Zarathustra – an OverMensch – is one in a million. How about the rest of us? Well, all must be a part of the Creative process. Find an OverMensch and form a Creative Cluster. All are able to contribute to Moving the World!</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Conclusion</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Okay so we have told you a lot about the <em>I</em> and all And yes: It is very fascinating. Yes: We are supposed geniuses to be thinking about such things. But really!!: We seem to be sitting, thinking about frivolous things when the world has such important problems to be solved!</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Okay so it is the concept of Hydrogen ion that has led us hither hence. The more we know about the <em>I</em> &#8211; the more we know about Hydrogen ions – the more we learn about how we can get Hydrogen ions to do stuff we need! Well – you must remember: Hydrogen ions are able to tap into Dark Energy. Witness: Every atom possesses electrons whirling about it – Powered by Dark Energy. So: If we can enlist the help of Hydrogen ions directly – to make stuff: We automatically have &#8211; a Source of renewable Energy. Using Dark Energy: Look Ma &#8211; no hands &#8211; no visible sources of Energy.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">So: We have found Hydrogen atoms and ions to be most important items to be studying – to help build the Future. But is there not one major problem that we have overlooked in all of this? If there is a Hydrogen ion in our brain ‘looking out’ and if it is indeed eternal – there is no real fear of extinction: Then won’t this be giving crazies the license the freedom to kill anyone they want. We mean: Right now there is the fear and respect for death as being so Final &#8211; that helps keep society as polite as it is. Well. It is True that we will Live forever – however there will be a big difference between being an ion that is in charge of a human body and one that is just an atom by itself. Even if it is: Eternal.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">So we have to think this through. We are going to give up this human life anyway eventually. So: If one goes about killing folks he or she should be penalized for such atrocious behavior. – although perhaps the death penalty is no longer appropriate. Still : Murder should never be condoned – so prison terms are still needed. It is just that we no longer require the fury, hell-fire- and damnation of a Church to scare us into complying with simple rules of civility.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Also when we talk about Hydrogen ions: We are 99.9 percent certain that they are source of all gravity. We are certain that they are the key to Curing Cancer!!! But Please!: First things – First!</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">So – what have we learned here? We have learned that two-thirds of the world has nothing. The world is not full of a lot of crazy, mentally ill people. They have just found the <em>I </em>!</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">What this means is something very simple: Things may not seem easy – in fact – they will be quite challenging. Still: It is comforting to know that we can just put our heads down and accomplish certain tasks – without worrying that the world is filled with crazy manics intent on dismantling all we are doing.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">It seems that most people &#8211; this goes for all people of the world – wherever they live – would be happy – if they earned $120,000 a year. Well, that is impossible. OK – but this is the goal. Now let us see what we need to accomplish this goal. Every right wing potential dictator says – promises – his Base – that he alone is the one who will make people’s basic desires come True. Of course, he is a liar! We on the other hand – are good leaders. We are honestly and continually attempting to solve these World problems. First, Population Explosion must stop Now! What we must do is difficult enough without a moving target.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Second, We need Energy. Nuclear is OK but it will not feed the World. Electricity needs Power to generate it. AI will need three times as much Energy right away! Hydrogen is the answer. But not in the way – not in the form – that it has been addressed in the Past. We need Creative Clusters of Hydrogen ions – just like the ones that created Live way back when. Using Dark Energy which is infinite in its extent.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">This is not a pipe Dream! We just need scientists using both sides of the Brain concentrating on what is most important for once. Now!</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">So people are asking: What now?</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">We need scientists to take their work now very seriously. We are talking about all scientists – in all disciplines. We can see now that all disciplines have the Power to address Hydrogen ions. Experiments of every type must be done – physics, chemistry – but also examining the Hydrogen ion in each of our Brains – by means of psychology, psychoanalysis, analytical psychiatry. Literature, philosophy. History, politics – the Spectre of Donald Trump and the Right wing in Europe – scream &#8211; for us to make scientific research relevant! Sociology can move beyond the important areas of gay and minority rights and work with Creative Clusters of thinking People. Education must work with both sides of the Brain. Now! Whatever &#8211; whichever – projects disciplines are working on – are now second in importance. All have a place in this critical work! But how about Global Warming? Well, there are only a few more days of oil left. Q.E.D.! The century of oil is over.. We must pay the environment price of our indulgences. This is regrettable – but no remedial measures are possible or necessary – now.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">We need to redirect our attention now &#8211; there is a time bomb ticking here. Priorities have shifted!</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">It is time to start thinking about automated Cities. Of course this raises what some to consider &#8211; what would be another Spectre of sorts: Socialism. Yes, there needs to be a base salary for people which they can supplement with work on creative, intellectual, artistic innovations and breakthroughs.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">So there!: It turns out that we are not wasting precious time here! Hydrogen ions &#8211; and the <em>I &#8211;</em> are the keys – to the Future!!!!</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Let’s Go!!!</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">THE END</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Bibliography</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-amazon wp-block-embed-amazon"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="The I – Building a Cosmic Theology" type="text/html" width="317" height="476" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen style="max-width:100%" src="https://read.amazon.com/kp/card?preview=inline&#038;linkCode=kpd&#038;ref_=k4w_oembed_S2vba5FoXbk94l&#038;asin=B0DBLTDGQN&#038;tag=kpembed-20"></iframe>
</div></figure>



<p class="has-text-align-center">DiBernard, Barbara, <em>Alchemy and Finnegans Wake </em>(Albany: State</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">University of New York Press, 180), 163 pp<em>.</em></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Joyce, James, <em>Finnegans Wake </em>(Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Limited. 2012), 628 pp.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Jung, C.G., Constance E. Long, <em>Analytical Psychology </em>(New York: Moffat</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Yard and Company, 1916), 392 pp.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Kaufmann, Walter, Editor and Translator, <em>The Portable Nietzsche</em></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">(New York: Penguin Group (USA) Inc., 1968), 692 pp.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Rose, Eugene, <em>Nihilism – The Root of the Revolution of the Modern Age</em></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">(Platina, CA: St. Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, 2020), 124 pp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://cftheater.info/blog/the-i-building-a-cosmic-theology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biological Economics</title>
		<link>https://cftheater.info/blog/biological-economics/</link>
					<comments>https://cftheater.info/blog/biological-economics/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mini Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minibook]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftheater.info/blog/?p=1527</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Finally an Economic Theory that Works! by Frank W. Andres Copyright ©Frank W. Andres, 2023. All Rights Reserved. Fire Mountain Publishing 4075 Vineyard Ave. Pleasanton, CA 94566 Introduction We were&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Finally an Economic Theory that Works!</p>


<div class="wp-block-image is-style-rounded wp-duotone-unset-1">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="572" src="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/beehave_international_cover-1024x572.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-1528" srcset="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/beehave_international_cover-1024x572.jpeg 1024w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/beehave_international_cover-300x168.jpeg 300w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/beehave_international_cover-768x429.jpeg 768w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/beehave_international_cover-1536x858.jpeg 1536w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/beehave_international_cover-2048x1144.jpeg 2048w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">by</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Frank W. Andres</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Copyright ©Frank W. Andres, 2023. All Rights Reserved.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Fire Mountain Publishing</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">4075 Vineyard Ave. Pleasanton, CA 94566</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center"></p>



<p>Introduction</p>



<p>We were reading a book: <em>Debunking Economics – the Naked Emperor Dethroned? b</em>y Steve Keen. We were hoping to take this book with its detailed discussion of what is wrong with the discipline of Economics at the present time – and see if we could spread Light upon things – by bringing in ideas from our studies of Biology. After reading 60 pages of this incredible book – we realized that we had already experimented with models of Biological Eeconomic Theory – with great success when Mr. Andres was an Economist with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – and subsequent experiences as a consultant working with the Corps. We can just simply relay our experiences and this may help lead to an amelioration of a discipline that has always been deeply in trouble.</p>



<p>Well, Mr. Andres took his first Economics class in his sophomore year at U.C. Davis in 1962. He received an F on his first midterm. He had been on the Dean’s list the previous year. Troubled he bought a book on Economics that was featured in the University book store – <em>The</em> <em>Worldly Philosophers </em>by Richard Heilbroner. Well, Mr. Andres had studied hard for that first midterm – but he remembers having severe misgivings – just before he took the test: ‘I am just a kid. How am I – supposed to know what makes a great Economy work?’</p>



<p>Well, to make a short story shorter: Heilbroner simply said in so many words: ‘Economics is a game that people play. This book presents the ideas of six men who created this game. Just read this book – the game is a synthesis. It is a model. You just memorize the model. If the price of corn goes up in the countryside – the wages of steel workers go up also. With fifty steps in between. Nevermind thinking. Just play – the game.’</p>



<p>Mr. Andres received an A on the final for that first course and a B+ in the class. He would receive B’s from then on in a discipline that he would major in and graduate with. He also had a second major: Economic History – in the History department. In that discipline he was known for receiving A’s with four pluses on almost every paper he ever wrote. One major was a game. The other was: Simply Reality. It was Life itself.</p>



<p>Well, there was the Great Recession of 2008-9 – which we may still be in: Using our constructs of thought – we thought we knew the real reasons for the ’Recession’ and what should be done – and were amazed to find that the correct remedies were being applied during the first 30 days of the Obama administration.</p>



<p>Without further adieu: Let us lay out our new General Economic Theory – derived from an empirical study of Biological behavior.</p>



<p>What Happened!</p>



<p>The Great Recession of 2008-9: Well, Hillary Clinton had her own mysteries to confront in her autobiography – concerning her loss to Donald Trump. For most Americans – especially Economists &#8211; The GR of 2008-9 seemed to come out of nowhere. We knew better. The history of the U.S. is a history of Cotton – then Wheat. And finally of: Oil. The 20<sup>th</sup> Century was so much about us. About the U.S.! the U.S. has had successes but now suddenly – so much seemed to be going &#8211; wrong. No cigar! What happened?</p>



<p>Kyle Williams – in his book, <em>Taming the Octopus</em> &#8211; speaks of Corporations as being a species of Octopus. Well, Sinclair Lewis of course was the first to draw such an analogy. Before we confront the accuracy of such a depiction – let us start from scratch. ‘Octopus’: One is obviously talking about ‘Monopoly,’ but let us go back to Adam Smith; Speaking Biologically – how exactly would one speak Biologically about Classical Economics?</p>



<p>Well, first: Consider these things. The Great Recession of 2008-9 seems to have given the first signs that things are Greatly wrong with the existing Economic Theory. Neo-Classical Economic theory is of course fundamentally unsound. The U.S. is not a nation of small independent autonomous shopkeepers who are influenced only by price – prices of labor, land, capital, and products. No: Instead &#8211; F = ma, Newton, thermodynamics, boilers, steam engines well, these items and significant personages were the principle drivers to a new world which would soon become full of those inequities of a Moden Age: Monopolies. These monstrosities were part of a strange new sort of interaction among humans. In the Neo-Classical Theory – they were simply impossible.</p>



<p>The Great Recession of 2008-9 was forecast by Professor Williams just by looking at one thing: The exponential Growth in the debt-to-GDP ratios for Australia and the USA by itself was sufficient warning to any proficient economist at the time that a truly huge crisis was imminent. The Economic crisis began with a vengeance in September 2007. Unemployment in the USA doubled in the next year, while a 5 percent rate of inflation rapidly gave way to a 2 percent deflation.</p>



<p>We remember reading the <em>New York Times</em> in January of 2008. President Berack Obama had taken office and in his first month of office he seemed to be taking an important action every day of the month for thirty days. That was the month in which the government bought General Motors &#8211; among other things. Obama of course had little knowledge of Economics of his own – his experience before being President had been mainly the editor of a Law journal. Obviously some people had a plan and it was executed perfectly. And one had the feeling that if Hillary Clinton had won instead – she somehow would have been instructed to take exactly the same precise actions during those crucial thirty days. This book, <em>Debunking Economics, </em>promised at the onset to provide a brief and accessible look at an alternative, realistic model of the economy – which it never seemed to provide. In the Preface to this book’s second edition &#8211; the book foretold that this period will one day be renamed the ‘Second Great Depression – by future historians. This of course has not happened. Those thirty actions that President Obama took during that first month in office – seems to have done the trick. Of course, it now is also obviously True that he had had some help. We mean of course: This time Banks did not fail. Well, first of all of course: The Great Recession was caused by an increase in Oil prices. During the 1950s and 1960s – gasoline prices were around 25 cents a gallon. Then in 1973 there was the Oil Embargo when Iran threw off the leadership of Saudi Arabia and simply started charging much more for oil. The price of Oil jumped for Europeans at that time &#8211; to the range that exists today: In the range of 4-5 dollars a gallon for gasoline – well, in California. The U.S. was still protected by cheaper Oil from Saudi Arabia which kept gasoline prices in the neighborhood of one dollar a gallon. Still the jump in gasoline prices in 1973 was sufficient to have a profound impact on the U.S. Economy – although the impact did not occur until around 14 years later. When the impact finally occurred it was expressed mostly by a failure of Banks. Well, an increase in gasoline prices increased the costs of transportation to and towards the Core of the metropolitan areas in the U.S. This caused the value of suburb properties to fall and the price of land in the core areas to jump some four times. It took fourteen years for these transportation cost pressures to be expressed in new skyscrapers in metropolitan area core areas &#8211; increasing the number of commercial and residential properties. This increase in Core properties in value and space ultimately caused suburban prices to plunge causing Savings and Loans to fail in vast numbers during the 1990s.</p>



<p>In 2008-9: Things seemed to be even more serious this time. In the past: Well, Oil prices would go up – gasoline of course would follow up also – the demand for land properties closer to the center of the metropolitan area would increase by approximately the same ratio. And properties in the suburbs would fall in value because of the long distances of expensive travel now required daily to work to or towards the center of the metropolitan area. The values of suburban property would fall and banks with those mortgages were instantly in trouble. As we say: During the 1990s the impact of the 1973 oil embargo was finally felt &#8211; when one third of the banks in the U.S. – mostly the ‘Savings and Loans’ &#8211; as they were called – which carried the mortgages of suburban properites &#8211; failed. This time in 2008-9 &#8211; development of new and larger properties in downtown San Francisco and Oakland, for example, were delayed indefinitely to mitigate anticipated impacts of the increase in the price of Oil. This time the impacts on banks was also mitigated by the use of what became to be termed: ‘Derivatives’ &#8211; that is, the bundling into stock piles &#8211; of toxic mortgages &#8211; which were sold as premium grade non-risk securities to large financial institutions. This time: These large financial groups absorbed the Pressures of high-priced Oil – instead of banks.</p>



<p>When the Great Recession struck: Economic theory was the last thing on any person’s mind. The Charman of the Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke said at the time that this financial crisis had been ‘more a failure of economic engineering and economic management than that of what I have called economic science.’ This would imply that someone has ideas of how things actually work but at that point measures were more part of a total Practice – a part of what was a kind of an Art – than a Science.</p>



<p>Ricardian Analysis, Macro Economic Theory, and Biology</p>



<p>When Mr. Andres was an Economist with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, he worked on many flood control projects in the Los Angeles and Phoenix areas. At one point, he was working on one project located in Ventura County, along Sespe Creek, which was a tributary to the Pajaro River in the vicinity of Fillmore, California. A project along the Creek would allow urban development to expand from the City of Fillmore into the flood plain which would result in benefits from land enhancement. Mr. Andres was working on some twenty projects in the Los Angeles and Phoenix areas at the time &#8211; and it was apparent that there needed to be some way to make calculations as to when vacant land in the vicinity of various urban centers might be needed for development in the future. Mr. Andres developed a Ricardian spatial model for projecting urban expansion in the Los Angeles Area. Such a ‘Macro’ type of model was deemed impossible at the time. Macro Economics was seen as a mere aggregation of the decisions of individual firms. How could there be an Economics at a higher level? Well, there had been Keynesian Economic Theory – but we shall return to that.</p>



<p>` The general model that Mr Andres came up with &#8211; was based on the fact that an urban area with a central core area is like a valley with a river flowing through it. If one is raising corn, then productivity of land decreases as one progresses up the slopes of adjoining hills away from the fertile lands next to the river. In an urban area land becomes similarly less valuable as one moves away from the urban core due to increasing costs of transportation from outlying areas to or towards the center of the metropolitan area. At any moment in time the extent of the urban area is related to the amount of population that is in the area as it is spread outwardly contiguously from the core according to lines of increasing cost. Thus: Essential to his model was the delineation of an isochronic map laying out sequential lines of increasing costs related to distances from the urban core. Using such a map with isochronic lines, Mr. Andres took the extent of urbanization that existed in the Los Angeles metropolitan area in 1900 and established ratios between extent covered by urbanization and the amount of population that existed at a particular time. With such ratios, Mr. Andres took the extent of area covered by urbanization in the area in 1900 and added the population that actually occurred for every ten year period between 1900 and 1960. He then made a projection from the extent covered in 1900 for the year 1960 and the difference between his projection and what actually had occurred – was less than 5 percent! The model had experienced: A Proof of Product! Mr. Andres had just proved that a MacroEconomic theory is possible for entities larger than the individual firm.</p>



<p>However, he was able to prove more: Looking at the resultant projections &#8211; it soon was apparent that the growth of urban areas is very similar to the growth that occurs with molds – as increases in population is absorbed by outward contiguous expansion of the organism. Thus in this way: Mr. Andres had proved two things &#8211; that MicroEconomics can be expanded beyond the firm into MacroEconomics studies. The resultant model was more than a mere aggregation of the activity of individual entities. Principles of Ricardian analysis must be extended conceptually step by step to the Macro level.</p>



<p>Second: As we say &#8211; it became apparent that Ricardian analysis at the macro level had a counterpart in normal biological behavior. Thus instantly it was seen: One might be able to substitute the study of the mathematical graphs and dubious mathematical relationships – by lessons learned – from the examination of actual Biological behavior.</p>



<p>Keynesian Economic Theory</p>



<p>During the 1960s when Mr. Andres was at the University – there was an attempt to devise a ‘Macro’ approach &#8211; supplemental to the ‘Micro’ Neo-Classical approach. The former of course was the famous Keynesian Economics. This approach we have shown in a previous minibook &#8211; was derived from latter portions of Marx’s <em>Das Kapitol &#8211; </em>which had been translated from the German to English by one person and then simply appropriated by John Maynard Keynes. The main contribution of these portions of Marx’s work was a vision of an Economy as a Whole. In Marx’s vision – an Economy became a sort of living breathing organism that generated products but also Savings, that is, Profits &#8211; which then were available to be plowed back into the Economy – to be invested in the New. It was a vision of what one might interpret to be: A Healthy Biological Functioning organism. Human beings were sort of a parasite that lived within this organism &#8211; whose Fate as far &#8211; as Marx and Engels were concerned – the organism seemed to be largely indifferent towards. Nevertheless – the Marx-Engels perspective was hugely different from the NeoClassical approach which preceded it. Perhaps this new Macro model could be adjusted such that the prospects for human beings caught in the Capitalistic Web might be better off.</p>



<p>One enigma remained though: So there were Micro visions of the firm &#8211; and now Macro visions of the Whole Economy &#8211; but where do things like monopolies, unions and even government itself – fit into some sort of comprehensive theory? There were people like W.W. Rostow who envisioned how government could have in fact possess a role in helping undeveloped countries rise to become more developed. This was a dynamic vision in which government might play a very important part. Rostow developed an Economic Theory that included things &#8211; that operated like Stages – like pragmatic schemes for how certain part of the economy might take leading roles working with government &#8211; and help propel a backwards country – forward. This was a very optimistic time!</p>



<p>Biology and the Development of Economic Theory</p>



<p>Metropolitan areas are like molds and we have explained them using Ricardian Economic theory. So: MicroEconomic theory seems to be a mathematical way of looking at biology in general. A Neo-Classical world of multitudinous tiny individual firms is like bacteria or molds which have many individuals seemingly working in accordance with their own self interest – and yet is it not also obvious they have certain patterns that emerge at a higher – a Macro level – patterns that are assumed by the organism as a Whole? Plants have no one thing in charge – yet individual cells seem to be communicating with each other. A cluster of plant cells can move limbs to be more into the sunshine. A corporation &#8211; a monopoly &#8211; is more like an animal than a plant: It has one thing in charge. An Octopus has one ‘I’ in charge yet each limb has one also.</p>



<p>So there are instances in Biology – where Individual cells give up autonomy such that one ‘I’ can assume command and either by chemical or neural activity command large numbers of cells &#8211; to work in concert – move where there is more food – more safety – more women (Yes!), Some things are merely a change in time frame: Debt is merely postponing the culmination of transactions. So: There are similarities between human activity and animals.</p>



<p>But animals have instinct: Which is like MicroEconomics in slow motion. Animals make adjustments over long periods of time – here we are talking about evolution. People with brains can make mistakes instantly. At the Micro level: We just let people do what they want. Macro: Well – looking at the organism as a whole &#8211; there are times to grow the Pie – there are times to eat the Pie. These are the traditional positions of: Republican – Democrat. As we say: There are Arts and Crafts which have evolved to meet the needs of certain challenging moments in the Economy &#8211; like: Put money into the Economy to prevent a recession – raise interest rates to prevent inflation when we finally have a boom. Right now in the year 2024: We have bust and boom at the same time!</p>



<p>One of the things we did not know. The U.S. government forced ATT which invented the transistor to share its knowledge with competing firms – including Microsoft. See: We got rid of the bad influences of Monopoly &#8211; right there. Obviously Microsoft with Bill Gates and Apple with Steve Jobs were able to do more than ATT could/would have done by itself.</p>



<p>Monopolistic Competition</p>



<p><em>T</em>he book &#8211; <em>Debunking Economics –</em> has an interesting idea: Well, small firms are supposed to be equal. Their differences are Zero. Well, we have calculus involved here and as we know from that mathematics: A limit is zero &#8211; but there is a long distance between here where we might be presently located &#8211; and zero. The book keeps pointing out that the Earth is curved – but at any point where one might be standing: Things appear – to Be – Flat! So: How far is the deviation between the generalization that the world is flat &#8211; and reality?: Well, the Earth in reality is &#8211; A Globe!!!! Big difference! What this means is that a firm in actuality is not really equal to all the others. It really has its own little market – as Virginia Wolfe said: A Room of its own. Each firm possesses its own little monopoly: Just from the nature of Geographical Space. Q.E.D. There exists Monopolistic Competition! You live here – on/at a certain location on a map: There are only seven firms that sell glass within ten miles – if you need to replace a broken window you start with the firms closest and work outward – 99.9 percent of firms in the State you will never even think about let alone visit! And of course very quickly comes to one’s mind is the fact that most animals possess their own territory. They have ways to make it, defend it, utilize it. This Truth is probably True all the way down to bacteria. So when we think about MicroEconomics we can think of molds and how they cluster and grow like metropolises but we also must consider that each bacteria probably has its own territory that it stakes out at a microscopic level. So let us think how this breakthrough might lead to a new Biological Economics.</p>



<p>A Not So Dismal Science</p>



<p>So: Economics is not really the Dismal Science. Not when we think things through. In a small town most people have a 100 I.Q. How do they survive?! Well, there are things called: Practices and Crafts. Knowledge is passed from generation to generation. People are not geniuses but they have family they have Community. People have what we call: ‘Care’. This is related to Love. Economics thus is not a discipline that is focused only on Will and tearing the competition apart. A community works because people have been given skills from family and friends &#8211; and they have the patronage that often is related to friendships with other people in the Community. People take ‘Care’ of each other. They work together. Life is not a scary place – because of this ‘Care’. We have lost most of this &#8211; these past 60 years. This is part of what the Trump Crazies are yelling about. When we were young – we went to Church. Just as 80 percent of Americans did at that time. Now less than 30 percent do. Cell phones have encouraged this separation! Witness: Irony. Paradox. A cell phone is an invention that supposedly increases contact among people – but the fact is: The Opposite has happened! People are in silos listening only to what they want to hear – seldom relating to people in person. This new Distance among people – creates a New World. A Lonely World. People lose ‘Care’. People have lost intimate knowledge about other people and their families. People are actually alone now. The World now &#8211; is a frightening place. People are committing suicide.</p>



<p>A New Biological Economic theory</p>



<p>So: MacroEconomic theory has let us down. We are left with a MicroEconomic theory that is useless. But we have Practices and Crafts – such as the ones the Fed is now using during a challenging Economic time. But we don’t want to leave things the way they are. We desire to do more – than merely applaud problems. We desire a Theory that can move Worlds!</p>



<p>As we say: Right now Economists possess a mathematical theory that is the envy of all – yet in the end it is ignored by everyone. Right now the U.S. is in a period of inflation which fortunately has not plunged into a Recession – yet. But the fact is: Regardless of what the Arts or Crafts say: Everyone is unhappy. If we could just come up with the emergence of a new Theory that might not provide all the complete answers but would still provide a Beam of Bright optimistic Light and Hope – then our country might be saved four more years of a Terrible Trump presidency. We are faced with such a dismal prospect because a sizeable portion of our population is Angry and is willing to try anything even a potential dictator who might sweep aside all the wonderful aspects of a Democracy just because of a Napoleon who shouts and grabs unmentionable anatomy and claims he has all the answers. Such a prospect seems to be preferable to the present state of affairs that has no viable Economic Theory to help it. Right now the only hope to fight inflation is to keep raising Federal interest rates until the housing market collapses and inflation may be induced to fall towards the 2 percent range. Of course such action threatens the Nation with recession and unemployment. As we say: The U.S. has no real Economic Theory – just a NeoClassical approach which is full of mathematics and male dominance – so &#8211; we are left with only things that have sort of worked in the past – and not a real theory to guide government action.</p>



<p>The things is: We have forgotten Love in all of this. We have forgotten that the Economy is – an organism.</p>



<p>So: MicroEconomic theory is primarily an analytical exercise wherein the theorist merely looks at his or her Life and deduces from what is evident therein. The Macro approach as we have shown in a previous minibook comes from Marx – whose work carries a lot of ideological and political nonsense with it: Communism and all of that.</p>



<p>The fact is: Marx was looking at Hegel. He was looking for a Universal Economic theory. Hegel actually found such a theory for philosophy – but he neglected one step: Yes: There were people who could think inductively and some who could think analytically – but who was right? Well, Hegel came up with the right answer: You need both to find the Absolute &#8211; to find the Ultimate Synthesis. The Ultimate Truth. But to really understand what he had discovered – one must go one step further: One must relate the theory to Biology. Inductive – Analytical. Collection – Separation. History -Mathematics. Well, obviously what we are talking about here is: There are two sides of the Brain! We must look at physiology – we must look at Biology. In the end the Hegelian model collapses into a Biological one. Finally we have Power!</p>



<p>Fine: But what does this mean for Economics? Well, we need to step back and take a Universal view – a world view – move from the world of the individual firm and look at the totality of society – as a functioning organism! We ae talking about man and woman working together right and left sides of the brain to make the Economy work efficiently and smoothly.</p>



<p>So: In the end the Macro model is correct. Say’s Law and microanalysis seem to be complete and satisfactory: Except for one aspect &#8211; Savings does not seem to automatically bring forth its own Demand. Demand does not automatically bring forth its own Supply. One of the problems is: Time frame. Money is fluid. People are paid now. But they do not consume every bit of their income. They Save some. If they are rich – they save a lot. They keep excess money in a bank. The bank’s main job is to invest this surplus cash: In the New. But such investment takes time It does not take place right now like consumption does – it occurs tomorrow or the next day. – far from the day in which the income was earned. So: Supply eventually rushes forth to meet an increase in demand – but there is a lag. And a lag is enough to foul things up. So: The obvious solution as John Maynard Keynes proposed is: The government must step in and add a bit of demand here and subtract a bit there. To sort of even things out.</p>



<p>The problem is: If this is not done minutely accurately: We end up with inflation. Or we have to buy General Motors like we did – to help investment change gears NOW and not tomorrow!</p>



<p>So: We thought we had an angle: Biology Economics. But it turns out that J.A. Schumpeter was talking about ‘swarms’ of business activity one hundred years ago. And there was a French man talking about the Nation’s Economic Organism. So: This tack is not a new one. We were thinking about comparing the Nation’s Economy to a beehive. Every so often either the population of a hive grows larger or the existing hive degenerates and the bees must ‘swarm’ and build a new nest somewhere else. There are a lot of similarities between this behavior and Economic activity in every Boom and Bust. There is a lot of violence implicit in a Boom. That is: Things don’t just get better – we are talking infrastructure here – Baby! Manufacturing Plants have to be built. Rows of Machinery must be hammered together &#8211; metal joined , welded together with Great Sparks! Millions of dollars must be expended in a short period of time. And these monumental steps must be taken at a time that the men with the surplus money start seeing dollar signs in their eyes. Investors must be induced by the certainty of Humungus profits to become Innovators! They must be induced to provide the millions of dollars required – to Move the BeeHive!</p>



<p>So – the first step is: We must somehow make analogies between our Nation’s Economy and bacteria, plant, insect, and animal behavior. We could write paragraphs about how parts of the economy are like molds, plants and animal tissues. For instance: Fat in a human is like a bank – it accumulates excess energy to be used subsequently when required. Suddenly there arises in our minds: A synthesis incorporating what we know about Music Theory, Economic Theory, and Creative Clusters begins to come together.</p>



<p>A Biological, Musical, Sociological Theory</p>



<p>So: We are agreed that existing theory is useless. We just must be in a situation &#8211; like music was for centuries – there simply was no theory – so we must just do what was done way back then – we simply must do the best we can &#8211; with gimmicks and rules. If there is unemployment: Increase Federal spending. If there is inflation: Raise the Federal discount rate. And Pray.</p>



<p>Let’s see if we can’t do better.</p>



<p>Frist – we have experience. We – the authors of this minibook &#8211; have developed a new Music theory. What have we learned from doing that? Is there anything from that experience that can be used in developing a new Economic Theory?</p>



<p>So <strong>Music Theory</strong>: Looking at history &#8211; all was trial and error before Joseph Haydn. He gave us the Circle of 5ths that is like our Neo-Classical economic theory. Little has been done since then. We have desired to do more. So: We went to Alchemy. We used a couple of ideas from a body of urScience – primitive science – which looked promising: We moved from Dark to Light. Haydn created a Circle of 5<sup>th</sup>. You take the 12 scales in music. You place them in a Circle. There is C with no sharps or flats at the top. You move one notch at a time to the left and add one flat as you add one scale at a time. Until you reach Gflat with six flats at the bottom. Then back to the top then move one notch at a time adding one sharp with each scale. Until you reach the bottom where you find F sharp which has six sharps. In a tempered scale Gflat and Fsharp are the same at the bottom.</p>



<p>As we move clockwise around the Circle of 5ths from the bottom to the top and then down the other side: The dark colored scales are on the left side – the brighter ones are on the right side. We move through a rainbow of colors as we move around – culminating with purple at the bottom. This is the Philosopher’s Stone.</p>



<p>Can we use this knowledge to help build a new Economic Theory? Well: Economics must have ideas related to Growth – like moving from Dark to Light. In an Economy such Changes must be intentional . Things simply do not happen automatically when it comes to Growth. A Government is essential – leading the way. Like developing an underdeveloped country – we must have a plan we need stages of growth. As we say: We must move from Darkness to Light. This is not an exercise in mathematics and logic. This is an exercise in ‘Care’. War must Stop. Stop killing people! People must start moving from Fucking Deserts!</p>



<p>Now – a second thing we learn from Alchemy: Opposites. When we use triads in ways that have never worked before: Magic occurs!!! Fsharp – F minor, Dflat minor – D, Aflat minor – A, Eflat minor – E, Bflat minor &#8211; B – suddenly the entire Circle of 5ths becomes Gold!!!!</p>



<p>How about Economics? Are there opposites? Yes: Supply and Demand. Male and Female. Right and Left sides of the Brain. There is a Rainbow of Truth as one moves through these opposites: Will. Love. Truth. Beauty. Justice. Which are Components of every electromagnetic wave.</p>



<p>.</p>



<p><strong>Economic Theory</strong>: So – moving from Music Theory to the development of a new Economic Theory. Well, the first thing is obviously: Boom and Bust. We must somehow make analogies between our Nation’s Economy and bacteria, plant, insect, and animal behaivor. We have already written paragraphs about how parts of the Economy are like molds, plants and animal tissues.</p>



<p>Suddenly there was in our minds: A synthesis incorporating what we know about music theory, economic theory, and Creative Clusters. The last is an Idea – from Sociology. Or is it Philosophy? Ideas go Boom!: The Economy goes from Dark to Bright and meets at the bottom when/where Boom transitions into Bust. This is the Crucial point in music theory: It is the crucial Moment in the Business Cycle too. We need to turn this moment into Gold – Economically!. How?</p>



<p>Well, We know already that money surpluses – extra savings have been accumulating during the Boom – when the Boom begins to fizzle out now somehow we just cure any inflation that may be present as the Economy is still trying to move at high speed but it is losing gas and only the price level is still moving at a fast gait. At this point we need inventions to stir investors to action to create the next Boom and not let the economy fall into a Recession – or even worse – a Depression. Inventions become Innovations when investors become excited and decide to plow those accumulations of savings into Action that might make them millions of dollars! To make those millions of dollars – millions of dollars of savings have to be taken and turned into manufacturing plants and machinery. There has to be an initial Bubble of Excitement. How?</p>



<p><strong>Creative Clusters:</strong> it is time to take an idea from our book, <em>Omicron Blue</em>. Opposites: Left and Right sides of the Brain. Now we know where this idea can fit into a new MacroEconnomic theory! Franz Schubert &#8211; the composer &#8211; wrote a lot of little songs and instrumental works because he didn’t always have a symphony orchestra at hand. So: He and his friends had a sort of Creative Cluster of their own. They would meet in his parlor every month – each having worked feverishly on new stuff. Once a month &#8211; they would listen to and critique and work on all the new stuff together. We have a Creative Cluster in our household. Two of us are right hemispheric dominant in the Brain. This is ascertained from the only I.Q. test available for this side of the Brain: The Wechler-Bellevue Block Test. Two of us are left hemispheric dominant. All of the other I.Q. tests &#8211; measure this physiological fact. The four of us are churning our ideas out at a break neck pace. We can add people if and when it is a happy thing to do.</p>



<p>So here they are!: Ideas for as New Economic theory.</p>



<p>Invention Becomes Innovation</p>



<p>Well, our new music theory was not completed until we had a proof of product. Not that the theory will ever be completely finished – but hundreds of breakthroughs were proven to be Powerful and Working well &#8211; when we presented our musical production of ‘Faust 2024.’ Now we must do the same for our new Economic Theory. What we must do is: Simply show that our concept of Creative Clusters actually is able to produce new ideas that have economic value at a constant rate making inventions available to be inserted into an economy at the exact moment innovation is required &#8211; which is immediately before interest rates return to a low normal level. Even with the discount rate very high &#8211; aimed at reducing inflation &#8211; inventions should be attractive enough in their prospects for profit that innovators, investors will start working on the next boom even before the last one is over.</p>



<p>Creative Clusters using both sides of the brain must be shown to create new ideas continually which will supply a plentiful supply of ideas to be used when required.</p>



<p>Conclusion.</p>



<p>Degression here: As we say &#8211; the market gave us cell phones but did not protect us from dangers: Loss of ‘Care’. Loss of Community. People are unemployed or more accurately they are now earning less than they would like. So: They have cell phones with screens, games, sex, and friends to divert their attention &#8211; to help soothe their Anger. This is like drinking vinegar to assuage one’s thirst. People are now Alone and Angry. Is this any part of Economics? We maintain that it is. You can’t just invent something like a cell phone and not deal with all of its consequences. This is Tao Economics: Corporations simply must take in account all impacts of an action – these are called Externalities – like Global Warming.</p>



<p>So how about this?: Let us look at where the economy is obviously headed. We are talking about Automated Cities. If there are no human beings – what would robots do? Well, the secret here is: Humans are always involved. There is a hydrogen ion in each our brains that possesses Consciousness and Consciousness is always in Command. So even if a society is completely automated &#8211; it is still part of a Biological organism. So assume: Everyone is out of work. Machines now do everything. So obviously there must be a basic income that all receive which can be added to – if one is Creative and can come up with new ideas that lead to new production. See our book: <em>Omicron Blue</em>. It is finally time for us to move to the next step &#8211; not taken in that book.</p>



<p>Well, quickly we are diverted: We are worrying about some Unpleasantness in our Lives right now. But we need new sources of Energy and a cure for Cancer. Stop! We are dealing with our Economy right now. We are always headed off in some other direction! So: We have automated Cities. We have resources. There are people to feed. We have stopped population Growth. For God’s sake this must be done now! Our daily needs are being met. This means that we have somehow found a way to lift up two-thirds of the world that has nothing! Immigration is not bad. People must move from deserts where they have nothing to areas that have resources. Economic theory is becoming a sort of adjunct to Economic History.</p>



<p>Yes – things are very simple: Human society is – exactly like a bee hive, ant hill, tissues in the body are like a million tiny firms. We have two sides of the Brain. Not all societies are so lucky. We – simply – must led the Way! Now!</p>



<p>There is one final issue we must address: The Future of Oil! Simply Put: There is no such Future. We only have so many days of Oil left. It is the Elephant in the room. Two World Wars: The U.S. just simply went through three hundred years’ worth of Oil – in thirty years! Texas had as much Oil as Saudi Arabia. But the U.S.: Filled the Sky with Planes, the Sea with Ships, and the Ground with Tanks and other vehicles. Each of these pieces of equipment possessed a voracious appetite for Oil: Measured in Barrels per Hour! In 1937 the Rockefellers visited Saudi Arabia and arranged for the first time &#8211; for the importation of Oil into the U.S. – with the promise of cheap Oil for us until the end of the Twentieth Century. As we say: Iran sort of put a monkey wrench into this plan with the Oil Embargo. But the U.S. still had a good situation compared to the rest of the world: Until Now – when the Oil is almost completely gone.</p>



<p>So: Why haven’t urban cores gone on and built the skyscrapers filled with residential that property values now are screaming at the top of their lungs for right now. There was one prototype of such a residential complex built in Oakland, CA – it is seven blocks on a side – seven floors of residential above the ground three below with parking. The entire first floor is devoted to commercial and public properties – like museums and stuff. Exciting. But – what’s the point?</p>



<p>Are Americans really going to buy electric vehicles? Or will they finally just give in and just go with rapid transit all the way? Some cities have elephant trains and small buses that go anywhere &#8211; for free &#8211; right now! Big residential skyscrapers in the city cores will only suck even more people from the suburbs. At any moment gasoline will rise to $12 a gallon. And people just bought all of those Big Trucks!</p>



<p>Russia. Iran. Countries causing Big problems. But they are countries with only one Trick Pony: Their only export is Oil and Gas. The clock is ticking. The World is at a Crossroads. We are in need of a more Compassionate Society. We need more Women in Charge! There is a reason that every Hive and ant hill is run – by its – Queen!</p>



<p>Namaste!</p>



<p>THE END</p>



<p>Bibliography</p>



<p>Appelbaum, Binyamin, <em>The Economists’ Hour – False Prophets, Free</em></p>



<p><em>Markets, and the Fracture of Society </em>(New York: Little, Brown and</p>



<p>Company, 2019), 440 pp.</p>



<p>Blinder, Alan S., <em>After the Music Stopped – The Financial Crisis, the</em></p>



<p><em>Response, and the Work Ahead</em> (New York: The Penguin Press,</p>



<p>2013) 476 pp.</p>



<p>Brown, Clair<em>, Buddhist Economics – An Enlightened Approach to the</em></p>



<p><em>Dismal Science</em> (New York: Bloomsberry Press, 2017), 203 pp.</p>



<p>Alvin H. Hansen, <em>Business Cycles and National Income </em>(New York: <em>W.W.</em></p>



<p><em>Norton &amp; Company, Inc., </em>1951), 639 pp</p>



<p>Keen, Steve<em>, Debunking Economics – the Naked Emperor Dethroned?</em></p>



<p>(New York: Zed Books, Ltd., 2011), 478 pp.</p>



<p>Kotler, Philip, <em>Confronting Capitalism – Real Solutions for a Troubled</em></p>



<p><em>Economic System</em> (New York: American Management Association,</p>



<p>2015), 248 pp.</p>



<p>McLean, Bethany, Joe Nocera, <em>All the Devils are Here – The Hidden</em></p>



<p><em>History of the Financial Crisis </em>(New York: Penguin Group, 2010),</p>



<p>380pp.</p>



<p>Wheelan, Charles, <em>Naked Economics – Undressing the Dismal Science</em></p>



<p>(New York: W.W. Norton &amp; Company, 2019), 366 pp.</p>



<p>Williams, Kyle Edward, <em>Taming the Octopus – The Long Battle for Soul</em></p>



<p><em>of the Corporation </em>(New York: W.W. Norton &amp; Company, Ltd.,</p>



<p>2024), 290 pp</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed aligncenter is-type-rich is-provider-amazon wp-block-embed-amazon"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Biology Economics : Finally an Economic Theory that Works!" type="text/html" width="317" height="476" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen style="max-width:100%" src="https://read.amazon.com/kp/card?preview=inline&#038;linkCode=kpd&#038;ref_=k4w_oembed_kElYUxeEPAeRYP&#038;asin=B0D6NN9QXS&#038;tag=kpembed-20"></iframe>
</div></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://cftheater.info/blog/biological-economics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consciousness and Cancer- Randomness Does Not Converge!</title>
		<link>https://cftheater.info/blog/consciousness-and-cancer-randomness-does-not-converge/</link>
					<comments>https://cftheater.info/blog/consciousness-and-cancer-randomness-does-not-converge/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2023 20:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mini Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer and Consciousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CF Theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minibook]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftheater.info/blog/?p=1507</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Cancer and Consciousness – Randomness Does Not Converge! by Frank W. Andres. ‘Animism’, ‘Vitalism’ – these words are naughty ones in scientific work. Well, these prohibitions have been all right&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="has-text-align-center"><strong><em>Cancer and Consciousness – Randomness Does Not Converge</em></strong><strong>!</strong></p>


<div class="wp-block-image is-style-rounded">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="644" height="1024" src="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/71gsaYhW6BL._SL1500_-644x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-1508" style="width:402px;height:auto" srcset="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/71gsaYhW6BL._SL1500_-644x1024.jpg 644w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/71gsaYhW6BL._SL1500_-189x300.jpg 189w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/71gsaYhW6BL._SL1500_-768x1222.jpg 768w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/71gsaYhW6BL._SL1500_.jpg 943w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 644px) 100vw, 644px" /></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center"><strong>by Frank W. Andres. </strong></p>



<p></p>



<div class="wp-block-group"><div class="wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<p class="has-text-align-left">‘Animism’, ‘Vitalism’ – these words are naughty</p>



<p class="has-text-align-left">ones in scientific work. Well, these prohibitions have been all right so far – although research in biology may have been slowed because of it.</p>
</div></div>



<p class="has-text-align-left">But now the Day of Reckoning! Scientists have been fighting</p>



<p class="has-text-align-left">Cancer for too long. And now it appears that they are failing!</p>



<p class="has-text-align-left">Is it now the time to take those prohibited ideas hidden behind</p>



<p class="has-text-align-left">the curtains out into the Light! Let us see what can happen</p>



<p class="has-text-align-left">if we would only let Consciousness – have a Chance!</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-amazon wp-block-embed-amazon"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Consciousness and Cancer- Randomness Does Not Converge!" type="text/html" width="317" height="476" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen style="max-width:100%" src="https://read.amazon.com/kp/card?preview=inline&#038;linkCode=kpd&#038;ref_=k4w_oembed_jaQIIo9L8jb1G2&#038;asin=B0CR7ZGVHV&#038;tag=kpembed-20"></iframe>
</div></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://cftheater.info/blog/consciousness-and-cancer-randomness-does-not-converge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man And Woman As Commodities </title>
		<link>https://cftheater.info/blog/man-and-woman-as-commodities/</link>
					<comments>https://cftheater.info/blog/man-and-woman-as-commodities/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2023 18:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mini Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CF Theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Andres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAN AND WOMAN AS COMMODITIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minibook]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cftheater.info/blog/?p=1490</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[MAN AND WOMAN AS COMMODITIES The Death of Philosophy by Frank W. Andres Copyright Frank W. Andres, 2023 All Rights Reserved Fire Mountain Publishing 4075 Vineyard Ave, Pleasanton, CA 94566&#8230;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="has-text-align-center">MAN AND WOMAN</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">AS COMMODITIES</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">The Death of Philosophy</p>


<div class="wp-block-image is-style-rounded">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="314" height="500" src="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/51-JGw1ZU8L.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-1491" srcset="https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/51-JGw1ZU8L.jpg 314w, https://cftheater.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/51-JGw1ZU8L-188x300.jpg 188w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 314px) 100vw, 314px" /></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">by</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Frank W. Andres</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Copyright Frank W. Andres, 2023 All Rights Reserved</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Fire Mountain Publishing</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">4075 Vineyard Ave, Pleasanton, CA 94566</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Please visit our website at <a href="http://www.cftheater.info" data-type="link" data-id="http://www.cftheater.info">CFTheater. Info</a></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">Please Email us witrh your comments at</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">frankandres@MyYahoo.com</p>



<p>Introduction</p>



<p>For several years after 1968, Herbert Marcuse was supposedly one of the two most famous philosophers in the world – the other was Jean-Paul Sartre. The authors of this minibook – well, frankly – had never heard of him. His fame seems to have been due to two books he wrote while living in the United States, during the 1960s and 1970s: <em>Eros and Civilization</em> and <em>One-Dimensional Man</em>. These two books according to Andrew Feenberg &#8211; the author of a book we have been reading (which is cited at the end of this book) &#8211; allegedly represented the ‘utopian aspirations and dystopian fears of the time.’ Feenberg feels: Together, ‘these two books offer an original critique of advanced capitalism focusing on the social construction of subjectivity and technology.’ Well, the 1960s and 1970s in the U.S. &#8211; of course: Were famous for the ‘flower children’ that paraded about in various stages of undress and in various states of consciousness due to drugs – well, supposedly these young people also found time if they indeed can remember doing anything – of significance – during that time – well, they seemed to Feenbeerg – to have been seeking a philosophical basis for their ‘revolution’ – and supposedly found such a thing &#8211; in the writings of Marcuse. Well, one of the authors of this minibook was &#8211; there – then – and we don’t think Feenberg is correct: No one mentioned Marcuse in the pot parties we were a part of. Supposedly Marcuse was so closely identified with the New Left that after its decline &#8211; his theoretical contribution seems to have been overlooked – if indeed anyone every really seriously considered his ideas in a popular context. Today, according to Feenberg – the contributions of Marcuse must be considered to be ‘more relevant than ever’. In particular, Feenberg points to Marcuse’s ideas concerning something called: ‘Instrumental reason.’ We guess such a subject was related to: Marxist ideas concerning technology – that is, Tools.</p>



<p>Marcuse’s philosophy as well as Feenberg’s book are important here &#8211; only because they give us admirable, succinct looks at the works of Hegel, Heidegger, Marx, and Freud. As one reads of the essence of each of these philosopher’s thought – as they might relate to the ideas of a supposed ‘Hippie’ culture – one is struck by the fact that – each of these philosopher’s ideas can be seen to be part of One overall philosophy – one that possesses the Power to include much of traditional philosophical thought in its construction. Of course, we have studied all of the philosophies addressed in Feenberg’s book &#8211; in depth on our own. In fact we have several minibooks addressed to the central precepts of each of these men – books that are available on this site. We maintain that our philosophy addresses and elucidates the salient aspects of these philosophies to the extent that we might assert that our new, original philosophy might be extended: It might well stand in for most of much of all philosophy in general. This amazing assertion is because we can see that all philosophy simply devolves into one discipline: Biology &#8211; specifically as that field of study pertains to the examination of the human brain – well, actually any center of cognition in any form of animal life – that is examining a brain &#8211; from the ‘inside out’. When this is understood: A major question emerges: Does philosophy still stand as a separate discipline any more? Or does it immediately become an adjunct – albeit an important one – subordinant to the field of biology? That is: Are we acknowledging the Death – of philosophy? That is: Should we not acknowledge the death of a dialog among thoughtful scholars concerning abstract considerations of the workings of a human mind – which now can be replaced by serious focus upon biological workings of brains in general – which are no longer subjects of thought &#8211; provoking repartee but now are focused on empirical examination of biological functioning. In this new proposed ‘sub-discipline’ of biology: Well, there are problems &#8211; empirical work is hampered by instruments that are unable to examine things that are too small or moving moving too fast. However, such deficiencies may now be supplemented by work that is informed by the realization that every biological entity possesses an <em>I </em>which is control of its physical activity. Every animal has a hydrogen ion in its command: This <em>I</em> is the recipient of empirical knowledge concerning the operation of the cognitive organ that it is a part of. Only a human being is able to take this information, understand that an <em>I</em> exists and that it is ‘looking out’, and is able via language to report what are truly legitimate empirical findings to the scientific world. This knowledge gives information that is valuable for every discipline in the curriculum of the University. In particular: this new augmented field of Biology – with its inadequate instruments will benefit from such intimate, empirical knowledge. Even a field such as physics can benefit from such studies – when one realizes that he or she is viewing the world – from the center of a hydrogen ion! &#8211; actually from the center – of a Black Hole!</p>



<p>Once we realize that traditional philosophy is really gone – we must next decide what topics philosophers should actually be considering – what they should begin to focus on. At the time that Marcuse lived and worked in the United States – a form of philosophy called ‘postmodernism ‘ actually was taking the discipline into what we feel were new constructive areas of thought. For example: There was one strain of thinking – that was focused upon materialism in modern powerful economies and the eroding effects such focus upon consumption of commodities can have upon intellectual and moral attainment. At the same time, we acknowledge: There was also a tendency for such thinkers to address problems of language – these studies were related more to the playing with words and the reaching for easy conclusions that seemed to be related to a philosopher’s hemispheric dominance in the brain. As we shall see here in this minibook: This second part of a recent philosophy &#8211; was a symptom of a discipline &#8211; which has simply &#8211; lost its way.</p>



<p>The <em>I</em> and</p>



<p>Hemispheric Dominance in the Human Brain</p>



<p>One of the authors possesses an I.Q. of 230 – which seems strange since it is universally understood that I.Q tests do not yield scores higher than 200. Well, most I.Q. tests are designed to measure the abilities of the left side of the brain.. The abilities of the left side of the brain are analytical and deductive in nature – and these abilities are able to be evaluated using written questions – 200 questions are given and if all are correct, then one receives a 200 I. Q.</p>



<p>There is only one I.Q. test for the right side of the brain: The Wechsler-Bellevue Block Test – which is a performance test. One is given blocks with patterns on them and given a pattern on a piece of paper to be duplicated with the patterns on the blocks – if one is able to do this in say 4 minutes which is impossible but which would be able to be processed by means of the tests’ calculuses &#8211; then the I.Q, would be like 400. Well, what we mean is: 200 is not the upper limit when it comes to a score that can be received on this test. When this author received this score he was told that the test had been used for quite a while and two notable people that had been given high scores were Hegel with 160 I.Q. and Goethe with 170.</p>



<p>This author thus has an unique perspective when it comes to reading philosophy. When he reads a philosophy by Hegel he reads not just the words but he also can see patterns of thought being referred to in the words &#8211; that mirror biological processes which exist in his own brain. This author knows how his brain works &#8211; so when Hegel talks about an abstract concept such as the ‘Absolute’ – this author understands that this is a word that is ‘standing in’ – for an ability that his own brain possesses. With these ideas in mind – let us look at the philosophers that both Marcuse and Feenberg placed great emphasis upon. In this examination we shall place our greatest emphasis upon: George Freidrich Hegel. He was a man capable of great Synthesis. It is he that alerted the authors of this minibook to the fact: When one considers traditional philosophy – he or she is simultaneously and necessarily looking at words &#8211; that we maintain are related &#8211; to the physiology of the human brain.</p>



<p>A note need be added at this point: One author here possesses an extremely high I.Q. &#8211; but there is no danger of hubris. For almost all of his life he has been disparaged, discounted, considered unworthy of participation in intellectual discussion. This experience will never &#8211; be forgotten – or discounted. This author realizes what every person on earth – ultimately must accept: He, they, you – possess – only one side – of the brain. There is an entire world – that you have absolutely no conception of!</p>



<p>Hegel</p>



<p>So the philosophy of Hegel: Well, we have gone through this many times before. There was Descartes who said everything is clear and distinct. Then there was Berkeley who said everything is relative. Then there was Leibniz who said: Not only are things clear and distinct but they can be drawn up into precise most clear and most distinct categories called – monads. Then did Hume retort: Not only are things not clear and distinct – but instead nothing can be known for certain – ever!</p>



<p>Well, Immanuel Kant suspected that something was up &#8211; with all this back and forth. Perhaps there were simply two types of minds – two different sets of abilities that human minds have: Different abilities, different faculties &#8211; which when combined have the potential to result in a product that is essential to intellectual thought. So he attempted the obvious: He decided to attempt to create a synthesis of all of these ideas – to see if in some manner this might make sense in terms of logical sequence. Well, his <em>Critique of </em><em>P</em><em>ure Reason </em>of course is famous &#8211; but unfortunately it is inadequate – as Kant attempted to create a synthesis using analytical – deductive means. In the end, Kant ended up with the categories of Space and Time – which truly are the most essential ideas that are related to all things. Nevertheless these categories remain just that: Analytical categories &#8211; with no content.</p>



<p>So this called forth responses: From Herr Hegel – for which he &#8211; is famous! This man attempted the Grand Synthesis of all thought by means of a synthetic, inductive approach. Unfortunately, a mind like that has problems with language: His explanation of things &#8211; is simply &#8211; not clear and distinct enough. So a proper conclusion to be made at the end &#8211; at that time &#8211; was: Nietzche and Kiekegaard were right – we would do best – if we just simply considered stopping all of this nonsense – and just consider &#8211; other things &#8211; like Will and Love.</p>



<p>Well, as we have said: We have gone through all of this before – but it just became apparent as we read this book by Feenberg about the work of Herbert Marcuse – well, as we worked our way through this most recent of considerations of all these various philosophers – Plato, Hegel, Heidegger, and Marx and even a person, like Freud – well, it becomes apparent: One size fits all! Hegel’s final synthesis when view properly &#8211; collapses into biology &#8211; and Philosophy simply – along with Nietzche’s God &#8211; is Dead!</p>



<p>So Herr Hegel: Simply put &#8211; Hegel said that Kant was correct in stating that there are different categories of thought and these do seem to work together. In the end: Yes &#8211; all of philosophy does seem to collapse into two Tools &#8211; Space and Time.</p>



<p>Hegel went on, however: Yes, the philosophies of people like Descartes and Leibniz all do seem to work together &#8211; but a whole bunch of thinkers – are left out! The mind does have an analytical, deductive ability – but for other thinkers &#8211; there is something else – that seems to be equal in importance: The synthetic, inductive ability. Space and Time as tools just will not suffice as concepts of ‘ultimate; or ‘Absolute’ sort of tools. As we say: What is missing is the entire content – of intellectual thought. Form of thought. Content of thought. Put them together: And Wahlaah! Magic! Well, the <em>I</em> is Magic. There seems to be Magic – everywhere! For example: The <em>I</em> is Consciousness. We simply do not know what: Consciousness is. It is simply: Magic.</p>



<p>More about this <em>I</em> – sort of Magic &#8211; later. But human beings have found one more Source: Of Magic! Well, as we say: This is what Hegel is really all about! Let us recollect – anthropologically &#8211; biologically – the human being is: The ape – who creates – Tools. Yes, man and woman apes took things – like a tree limb and killed things with it &#8211; and later maybe even swept the cave. For the first time in evolutionary history this was not the result of molecules embedded within DNA in each human cell – for the first time in history – this was not the result of instinct &#8211; but instead this was the result of a Miracle: An animal mind somehow was observing things in its own way – processed them in its own way – and as the result of certain Powers in its brain &#8211; this animal had come up with something that the Earth had never seen before: There was Magic! There was: An idea!</p>



<p>Hegel traces in detail – a little too much detail for some peoples’ tastes &#8211; as to how exactly – it is – that objects become ideas. It turns out that there is a thing called the ‘mind’. Well, we shall jump ahead here: We shall simply introduce our philosophy – right here. In every particle in the Cosmos there is an <em>I . </em>That is: There is Consciousness. All energy possesses Consciousness. Energy is bound together most densely into nodes: which at the time of the Big Bang were &#8211; hydrogen atoms – whose nuclei possessed Black Holes. Every living thing possesses hydrogen ions that are in charge of biological activities. In plants every cell has such an <em>I</em>. In animals there is one <em>I</em> that is in charge over all of these cellular <em>I</em> s &#8211; as well. As we say: Consciousness is Magic! We shall never know what it is. But we do know: What it does. The<em>I</em> does three things: Perceives, Thinks, and Acts &#8211; with the aid of a memory. Thus our philosophy begins with a Cosmic entity – but this is also a biological entity – a hydrogen ion which is in charge of a human brain.</p>



<p>But there is more: There are two types of human brains: There are two hemispheres in the brain &#8211; each with different abilities. Each person has dominance in one side of the brain or the other. No person possesses both. Each hemisphere performs operations that are essential to creating a final product: That of a Tool. Both sides of the brain &#8211; that is, two people with different hemispheric dominance in their brains &#8211; must work together in order for intellectual thought to progress.</p>



<p>Hegel tells us how the two sides of the brain work together. First – there is Perception. Well, as we say: the hydrogen ion that is in charge of our brain – is a particle. And all particles possess a wave attached to them. These waves are conduits of information flowing between particles and objects &#8211; and other particles in the external world. There is always a wave between our <em>I</em> and objects in the external world. Thus, there are always patterns of information that always exist between our <em>I</em> and those objects. Right way: We are once removed &#8211; from objects external to us.</p>



<p>In addition for humans: There are biological organs which are instantly digesting and manipulating the beholding of objects external to us substantially &#8211; to begin with. For example there is no color ‘red’ out there – anywhere. There are no straight lines out there. So already we are part way towards a Tool – called an Idea.</p>



<p>After things are Perceived by organs in the brain – then humans take the second step: They Think! This step is aided by: Memories of objects that have been obtained before &#8211; and by the operations of two sides of the brain. Considerations regarding memory will appear below. However, at this point we shall examine carefully differences between the operations of the two sides of the brain. As we say: There are two sides of the brain in every person &#8211; each side with different abilities. Every person is dominant in one hemisphere or the other – never both. In the case of right hemispheric dominant people – information concerning objects in the external world are collected into bundles of perceptions. How do such people do this? They perform a biological act that only a human with dominance in the right side of his or her brain &#8211; is able to do. All new knowledge is initiated by people who are right hemispheric dominant. That is: the right side of the brain is able to detect: Similarity!</p>



<p>As Roger Sperry at Cal Tech discovered in his work with epileptics who had had their corpus callosums severed: The right side of the brain is able to discern innately and automatically &#8211; similarities in the characteristics among isolated objects – and then discern similarities in the patterns in which these objects move and interact with other. Recognition of such patterns naturally might lead to expectations concerning future moves among similar objects. In this way – the right side of the brain creates: Concepts. Things that look alike are given a name – which is related to a concept based on similarity among certain objects. Things may also move routinely in a certain sequence – this similarity is given a name related to a similarity called ‘cause and effect’ that exists often among these objects. All of these concepts are combined in the right hemisphere within what is called: A type of Grand Synthesis – which Hegel called – The Absolute. This Synthesis is a pattern among concepts that is generated automatically in the right side of the brain of a right hemispheric dominant person. These generalizations are all just globs of perceived similarity: There is no certainty to any of this.</p>



<p>Then other men and women &#8211; with different proclivities related to the left side of the brain: Well, they take those names for objects and movements and work with the concepts attached to them. They are able with their abilities: To discern central attributes that are always present when objects with certain names and interactions are observed. They realize that the first men and women have done a lot of work. But lots more can and must be done – to reap tremendous Power in the form of Tools. At this point: Humans with dominance in the left hemisphere of their brains are able to do an astonishing thing: They are able to Separate! In this process: One examines clusters within Grand Syntheses – which were created by someone else &#8211; to discern essential attributes that are possessed by each name. For clusters of objects that are similar &#8211; essential attributes of clusters are identified – they are called: Definitions. For clusters related to the Similarity among movements of objects &#8211; these essential attributes are called: &#8211; Determinants. Plato called both of these types of essential attributes: Forms. When one works through these two processes – these are two types of creation &#8211; performed by different people – that is: Perception – then Thought &#8211; with its Collection and Separation – well, when humans work through these two processes they end up with a Miracle: Together &#8211; they Create an ‘Idea’. And an Idea is: A Tool! Such a Tool is able to be used to impact the world around the humans! Humans thus are able to Perform a third process – along with Perception and Thought – the third process is: Action! Humans are able to impact the world around them – in ways that animals have never been able to do – before! And of course &#8211; what one notices right away is: Well, all of this is anthropological. All of this is: Biological!</p>



<p>Yes &#8211; if one looks closely – it is all right there – in his books: Hegel did indeed come up with all of this – but his inadequacy with articulation of words and concepts left a hopeless mass of words which end up having a metaphorical, blurred type of relationship to the Truth. However, if a reader happens to be right hemispheric dominant – he or she is able – to see things – that other people may fail to see.</p>



<p>Plato</p>



<p>Well, Hegel is sort of at the end of Philosophy. Plato is sort of – at the Source. How does Plato ever become – Biology? We mean: His whole message is primarily &#8211; ‘Reason operates with universal concepts that enable the ordering &#8211; of the infinite flux of experience – concerning objects in the external world – into a rational, coherent system – of understanding.’ He was always talking about abstract things – as we have seen above &#8211; called Forms. What do these ideas have to do with – a real world?</p>



<p>Actually, Plato’s words do relate to physical things. However, there is a confusing aspect to his notion of ‘universal’. Well, as we say: There are two sides of the brain. The right side is inductive, synthetic – which works on the basis of similarity and cause and effect. It creates a ‘universal’ &#8211; well, a Synthesis with links among perceptions of objects in the external world by means of the right hemisphere’s ability to spot similarities among objects and then spot similarities among the movements of these objects – well, patterns are observed that repeat &#8211; this is seen then that – which implies that movements might be related – but for the right side of the brain – there is never certainty.</p>



<p>Which brings us to Plato: We are interested in Plato for two reasons – first &#8211; he tells us about the left side of the brain – second &#8211; he also tells us about Cosmic things. That is, his philosophy not only talks about phenomena related to hemispheric dominance in the brain but also to phenomena related to the hydrogen ion that in charge of each human’s brain. The hydrogen ion brings certain attributes to the philosopher’s table – which every star possesses – which every particle possesses: Will, Love, Truth, Beauty, and Justice. These attributes are found in the electromagnetic waves that are attached to every particle. And since Plato was left hemispheric dominant, he necessarily spoke of phenomena related to left hemispheric thought – which possesses its own type – of universal – called: A ‘Form’. The left side of the brain is analytical, deductive – has a ‘spot’ memory concerning ideas related to objects in the external world – and it relates these ideas one to the other by means of equivalencies: Mathematical, deductive, logical relationships &#8211; which that side creates automatically.</p>



<p>In this way: Plato’s side of the brain has a peculiar understanding. On one hand, it understand that a peculiar kind of perfection in ideas exists. However, on the other hand, nothing in the external world seems to honor or possess such a perfection. Particulars, objects in the external world – just simply fall far short of the perfect realization of concepts that exist in the left side of the brain – concepts that are used by that side of the brain to order and render meaning unto &#8211; these objects. No drawing of a triangle is actually a triangle; no white object can be perfectly white. But as Marcuse pointed out &#8211; the opposite is also True: Concepts cannot be reduced to particulars. They contain what Marcuse calls a ‘transcending’ content that is available to the experiencing subject as a sense of incompleteness or imperfection. In the case of Life, and especially of society, that content takes the form of potentialities awaiting realization. These potentialities are real, not simply as theoretical projections but in a strong sense that implies an ontology to which Marcuse repeatedly referred to but never fully elaborated.</p>



<p>Marcuse believed: Consciousness of social potentialities must be attributed to the imagination because it alone has the power to project beyond the given toward an ideal form. This is wrong: as we shall see &#8211; the left side of the brain conceives of ‘forms’ of thought &#8211; such as syllogisms and mathematics. These forms are somehow intrinsically embedded within the neural fabric of left hemispheric analytical thought processes. They probably have no relationship to any type of so-called potentialities in the world external to a philosopher. When it comes to imagination – we shall consider this subject under the heading of ‘Freud’.</p>



<p>Thus everything in Plato’s philosophy is related to the physiology of the brain. His forms and strategies of deductive thinking were related to dominance in the left hemisphere of his brain. And the Cosmic attributes of Will, Love, Truth, Beauty, and Justice are attributes that are carried about by every atom that exists in the Cosmos. There happens to be such one such particle – a hydrogen ion – that is in charge of each person’s brain – carrying these Cosmic attributes with it. In this way every aspect of Plato’s philosophy is related to the physiology of the human brain.</p>



<p>Heidegger</p>



<p>Marcuse’s early Marxist work was written under the influence of Heideggerian phenomenology. Important aspects of Heidegger’s phenomenology is the distinction between the lived world of everyday experience and the empirical facts studied by natural science. Marcuse’s main purpose seemed to be to provide an account of subjectivity that was lacking in the Marxist tradition. We believe: Heidegger’s main concern &#8211; without his realizing it was &#8211; The <em>I</em>.</p>



<p>Heidegger’s main idea was: ‘Dasein’. That is: For the human brain there is no such thing as an object in the external world – none, that is, that exists for a human – in a plain, unadulturated way. The <em>I</em> simply processes – digests, as it were – every object that is perceives. It is our belief: An <em>I</em> is able to work with &#8211; only concepts. Again &#8211; let us explain this in our way: An <em>I</em> is a hydrogen ion – it is a Cosmic entity. As we say: The Cosmos is composed of only &#8211; Energy. All energy possesses Consciousness. In the first billionths of a second &#8211; at the time of the Big Bang – some of this energy was concentrated into nodes around tiny Black Holes &#8211; these nodes have been called: ‘Atoms.’ 99.3 percent of all atoms at the present time are hydrogen atoms or helium atoms – the latter are made from hydrogen atoms fused together. The remaining .07 percent of atoms have been made later in stars – this creation done &#8211; by hydrogen ions. In this way: Everything in the Cosmos – has been created by – hydrogen ions. Both hydrogen and helium atoms possess Black Holes. They possess a tremendous amount of energy &#8211; and therefore a tremendous amount of Consciousness. Helium atoms have two Black Holes revolving around each other. The Consciousness of a helium atom is unable to be expressed. A helium ion is simply unable to impact the world around it. Thus only hydrogen ions are able to do anything of any consequence – well, compared to what any other atomic ion can do. An atom must be an ion – that is, it must be bereft of electrons to have an impact on the world around it. The rest of the atoms do not possess Black Holes. They are like slaves with hydrogen ions in charge &#8211; encoded memories are given to them by hydrogen ions – which guide all of their interactions with other particles.</p>



<p>Every human brain has a hydrogen ion in charge. Every particle in the Cosmos has a wave attached to it. The wave is used by a particle to communicate with the world around it. Thus all reality &#8211; all Perception of objects in the Cosmos &#8211; is mediated by – is conducted by means of &#8211; patterns of information that are moved by means of waves. Thus in the Cosmos there is no direct information conveyed concerning the attributes of one particle to another. In this way: Heidegger’s phenomenology presents a physical fact – it denies the assertion of the scientist – that his or her science – explains ultimate reality. The fact is: All human thought is – <em>I.</em> An object is always in a place – somewhere away &#8211; from Consciousness. Consciousness is always physically separated from reality. Our notion of reality is always contaminated by: The <em>I</em> . Using Heidegger’s terminology: As far as the <em>I</em> is concerned &#8211; all reality is ‘Dasein’.</p>



<p>In the early twentieth century, in a context of rapid scientific and technological advance &#8211; well, in a world of Industrial Revolution: Naturalism – that is, a false belief in the ability of the scientist to work intimately with objects – ‘as they really and actually are’ &#8211; was on the rise. Much mainstream liberal thought accepted it. As we say &#8211; in the face of Industrial Revolution: Now &#8211; only ‘facts’ were considered real, and philosophy seemed to have no facts of its own to study. Familiar philosophical categories such as: ‘Essence,’ ‘ideal forms,’ ‘substance,’ ‘monads,’ and the Cartesian <em>cognito</em> &#8211; lost their footing in the objective world.</p>



<p>Neo-Kantian philosophy had a concept of object construction: This philosophy believed in a certain conceptual schema – namely &#8211; ‘The category &#8211; creates the object!’ Such a statement seems at first glance to be absurd. But then let us reconsider: If the <em>I</em> possesses its own Truth of things – as is mandated by the particle with its wave &#8211; well, then Categories are all &#8211; the left side of the brain truly has. For the left side of the brain – all that it possesses &#8211; are categories – which in turn are based upon the Perception of objects &#8211; which we have seen &#8211; is necessarily incomplete. Thus a object in the external world examined by a left hemispheric dominant scientist is therefore &#8211; not a ‘thing-in-itself’ &#8211; but instead is &#8211; a ‘reference structure’ based on intuition and constituted by categories: It is a Truth constructed by an hydrogen ion from translation of information brought to it – by its wave.</p>



<p>As Hegel understood: All of this idealist – all of this conceptual confusion – collapses into ‘mind’. All Truth for him is: Mind. So he has been called an idealist. The mind creates everything – even the Truth. But we who are right hemispheric dominant in the brain &#8211; when we read Hegel – we simply dig deeper: Well, as we say &#8211; Hegel’s words have special meaning to us. We realize: When Hegel is talking about ‘Mind’ – he is touching – his head! We have information that both Hegel and Heidegger did not have. We realize instantly that we are not talking about abstract things here! Suddenly many things became clear to us &#8211; the very word ‘meaning’ must implicate a subject – an<em> I</em> &#8211; a real thing – a physical thing &#8211; that is able to recognize such a word.</p>



<p>Let stop for a moment &#8211; and look at the topic of memory in more detail right here. As we say: There is an <em>I</em> – with its Synthesis – a Grand sort of Synthesis that automatically exists in and is utilized by every right hemispheric dominant person – or such Synthesis is given to one – in which case a person – who is left hemispheric dominant &#8211; merely adopts what is given &#8211; since such a person is unable to create such a Synthesis on his or her own. As we say: A deductive mind has a ‘spot memory’ which absorbs much information that is previously worked up by other people. This deductive brain is able to able to utilize such ‘spot’ memories as he or she possesses a natural ability to deduce – use mathematics and logic to work with such ‘spot facts’.</p>



<p>The right side of the brain is able to memorize only by means of relationships between objects that are perceived and a Synthesis that already exists in one brain. The right side of the brain learns: Only by means of Connection. Children who are right hemispheric dominance in the brain have much difficulty memorizing facts in what is called a ‘routinized’ manner &#8211; as they have little in the Syntheses in their brains to relate new material to. Thus: Even in the process of memorizing facts &#8211; both sides of the brain truly benefit from working together.</p>



<p>Hegel spelled out a process that a right hemispheric person uses routinely in his or her brain – without a left hemispheric person even being aware of it. This is what Hegel termed: The Dialectic. This is simply how memory and hypothesis creation works within the right side of the brain. A mother first helps a right brained person start a memory by starting the creation of a Synthesis in his or her brain. From then on – all new information is taken by means of Perception and connection of concepts with this Synthesis. If a new concept can be related to the Synthesis in one’s brain – then it is either redundant and thus discarded – or it is added to adjust concepts concerning objects or concerning the movements among objects – adjusting cause and effects relationships among concepts in one’s brain. When new perceptions clash with concepts in one’s Synthesis – this can be exciting. This can be the cause for new Breakthroughs! This actually is the only source for new knowledge! Even results from experimentation cannot be processed adequately and proper generalizations made – without the aid of the right side of the brain. Witness: The work of Faraday.</p>



<p>In the Dialectic: When a new concept is presented to be considered in the face of the Synthesis that exists in one’s brain – this new concept is called a Thesis &#8211; the Synthesis that exists in the person’s brain at that moment is called an Antithesis. (Confusing! &#8211; thanks, Hegel.) So the new information is either integrated into the existing Synthesis within the right hemispheric dominant person’s brain &#8211; or it is discarded. The resultant Synthesis at the end &#8211; whether it remains the same or is adjusted to absorb new information concerning objects or movements among objects – is called Synthesis. &#8211; which is unexpected, disappointing, seemingly redundant – even confusing &#8211; until one understands that this may be a new – Synthesis! &#8211; one that is more Powerful than the one that existed at the start. That is: We have a new &#8211; at least, freshened &#8211; Synthesis – ready at hand to confront any new experience from the external world. The Synthesis is ‘freshened’ by the mere act of confronting it with new information. It is always exciting when old stuff is shaken up! People who are left hemispheric dominant are simply not privy to excitement such is experienced by right hemispheric dominant people every day – just like this! Sorry!</p>



<p>Thus &#8211; as Heidegger’s phenomenology conceives it: First-person experience is never completely objective &#8211; as adherents to the practices of natural science have often proclaimed. And this is particularly True at the present time &#8211; when progress is almost always limited to advances in understanding of a world that is submicroscopic – a world to which scientists have only limited access: Objects are either too small or are moving too fast for scientists’ instruments to measure. This is a major problem.</p>



<p>Marx</p>



<p>Despite Marx’s own interest in technology, there are surprisingly few Marxist philosophers who deal with the subject. As it turns out: Understanding the role of technology &#8211; that is, of Tools &#8211; in the economics of Marx is a key to understanding where his ideas actually came from and how his ideas have been misinterpreted.</p>



<p>Up to the time of Marx, economics as an academic discipline had been conducted according to microanalysis of the firm. Economics as a discipline has always been like a modern video game &#8211; wherein in this instance &#8211; the game could actually play itself! Yes – all one needs was one assumption: Human Greed! Then as it would seem – as with all the myriad variations in and with the exercise of thought during that Enlightened Age – among people such as Descartes and Pangloss &#8211; somehow inexorably – the Best of All Possible Worlds would somehow always result! In economics: A practitioner simply has to run his firm in a manner most rewarding to himself. Women were not allowed into the game at this point in time. And then so: What of the National Interest? Well, such a bold conception was merely the aggregation of all those tiny spots of Greed! One spot was happy. All &#8211; necessarily – must also be: Happy! Q.E.D. People like Say, and Ricardo jumped onto this avaricious bandwagon. What was there not to like?! Except: In the real world of political affairs there had obviously been ways in the past for leaders to guide the larger economic affairs of a community and nation – and their experience was: Such affairs &#8211; never seemed to be amenable or even relatable &#8211; to the aggregation of such individual interest. When Kings made decisions – well….</p>



<p>So out of nowhere – comes: Marx! From the start: Marx had a conception of the economy as a Whole. Where in the Devil could one come up with such a perspective. Well, we have gone though all of this elsewhere. But it is important for us to sum things up efficiently and quickly right here.</p>



<p>Well, as we have seen: Philosophy in its more traditional sense has ended with: Hegel. When it comes to economics &#8211; that is &#8211; economics in its most modern delineation: Well, this is simply astounding but &#8211; Hegel finds himself at its inception! How could this ever be?! Well, as far as a rigorous creation of what is now called a ‘macroeconomic theory’ is concerned: It all started when the philosophical theory of Hegel was adapted by Marx to be understood as a physical system which featured a method of creating and utilizing &#8211; Tools. And at that moment ‘macroeconomics’ was born. In this sense &#8211; economics operates as biological behavior on two levels: First &#8211; as a social reflection, duplication &#8211; of how the brain works – that is, society as a sort of a type of ‘brain’ &#8211; and second &#8211; as a description as to how the biological organism of <em>H</em><em>omo sa</em><em>p</em><em>iens modernus </em>is able to work at the aggregate – that is, society as a sort of – well, ‘ant colony’ &#8211; as a cluster of<em> I </em><em>s.</em></p>



<p>One idea that was important with Marx was that humans must be creative to experience joy and happiness. If they are not happy – well, look out – they are liable to revolt! You see – what he was thinking: In the modern industrial system – humans are no longer their own entrepreneurs on their own farms. It is true that for part of that time on the farm &#8211; they were the equivalent of a Tool – like a tractor that might be used to till a field. But there was always a aspect in which where they – were the masters in control of their own destiny: Farmer – as entrepreneur!</p>



<p>Now in the factory: Men were simply – objects. Men – were simply: Tools – which in Marx’s estimation was – quite a demotion. It was this idea of Tools and how men were being denigrated, lowered in status &#8211; from being creator &#8211; to being the equivalent to that which had been created – that was the crux of his revolutionary ideas. Well, to Marx: There simply was no way that normal men – could accept such a slight!</p>



<p>So when it comes to Marx – one should keep the idea of Hegel &#8211; with his ideas concerning how intellectual Tools are created &#8211; in mind. This will be important as we consider – below &#8211; how humans are being treated as objects – by corporations – at the present time.</p>



<p>Freud</p>



<p>Marcuse had a thing concerning: Freud and his theory of imagination. Yes, the imagination is &#8211; a psychological faculty. But for Marcuse it provided a possible source of insight into reality – as it might attribute an essential cognitive role to the imagination. The imagination may actually be an important source for new ideas.</p>



<p>Well, when we think all of this through: Imagination actually becomes two different things &#8211; when one considers the two sides of the brain. First: Marcuse binds ontology to psychology. Ontology for him in this way becomes physiology – becomes biology. Second: For us, imagination and its possible role in the development of new ideas &#8211; is related to Freud’s manner of thought which was related to Freud’s brain which was left hemispheric dominant.</p>



<p>So first: As Marcuse interprets Freud, the imagination is associated with as we say: Ontology – that is, with the mind and how it thinks – how it comes up with ideas – maybe new ideas &#8211; with the application of the imagination. For Freud the imagination was related to the erotic, which in a generalized sense Marcuse understands to be Life affirming. Life is motility, becoming, development. Well, all of this obviously is related to sex &#8211; and sex is definitely biological. In this way – for Marcuse: The gap between imagined fulfillment, the universal, and the actual condition of particular beings &#8211; is the stimulus to development. Life is perpetually engaged in overcoming that gap through transforming the environment and absorbing it into the world of the self. The utopian realization of the universal is not just the static resolution of the contradiction between concept and object, but Marcuse could see that its deployment under social conditions could expand its Power into the continuing development of human capacities. The Marxist application of these ideas is obvious. Marxism has always considered socialism to be a potentiality of capitalism, its negation and true significance in the history of humankind. In this view of the world – the <em>I</em> utilizes the imagination to create new ideas – new possibilities which can lead to aggregates of <em>I</em> s desiring and fighting for new vistas and heights.</p>



<p>The second view – which is our view &#8211; is succinct: The reality is &#8211; new ideas actually come &#8211; from the right side of the brain – of which Freud knew nothing about.</p>



<p>Man, Woman and Tools</p>



<p>In <em>One-Dimensional Man</em>, Marcuse argues that among the conditions of socialism is a transformation of technology, which now provides a total life environment, a ‘world’ in the phenomenological sense of the term – in the sense that the <em>I</em> is always separated from the real world – and thus inhabits a ‘world’ of its own. The impulse behind Marcuse’s critique of technology lies in how it contributes to harmony between human beings and nature. It is in technology that the unity of subject and object promised by idealistic philosophy &#8211; is realized. The rejection of mystery exposed the objective world to understanding of the scientist &#8211; and therefore also to technical control. Capitalism turned these powers of reason into enemies of Life. Technology under capitalism opposes human beings to nature in a struggle fatal for both, whereas under socialism a reformed technology could protect the natural world and favor forces in nature that contribute to human well-being.</p>



<p>The question is: Is a Tool just another object out in the external world – or is it mind? This makes a difference. Big difference. In the light of Heidegger’s <em>D</em><em>a</em><em>sein</em> &#8211; tools are never things out there like other objects in Nature. Tools are always a part of the Creator. They are always under the <em>I</em> s control and can be adapted to meet any changes in external requirements. Billionaries are simply not tied to the fiduciary responsibities related to their stock holders as they would have you believe. There is more to the Future of humanity than the mere more, more, more: Of Profit. Tools were created by humans &#8211; they remain under human control – and changes can be made – and now at this time in history it is apparent – many changes must be made – now – and quickly!</p>



<p>It was Marx’s insight that humans themselves become Tools &#8211; become objects to be manipulated and utilized in the production process. What he forgot was: There are three levels of creativity: physical, intellectual, and Cosmic. So a person can give him- or herself up to be used as a Tool – something created by someone else &#8211; and simultaneously receive ample joy and happiness from the creation of a physical type: Babies.</p>



<p>Flower Children</p>



<p>The New Left had something to teach Marcuse. In 1970, his historical experience was not yet over &#8211; rather, his involvement in the New Left represented a final chapter in which his own ideas underwent a further transformation. Cultural revolution means politics in what Marcuse called: The ‘depth dimension’ of the psyche, at the level of needs and identities. Earlier, Marcuse had argued that advanced capitalism reached down into the very instincts with its promised paradise of consumption, and thus that the manipulation of Consciousness by the system leads to the internalization of social control. Now, he claimed, this overwhelming force of social integration was answered by any form of resistance. There now arose an existential revulsion at the destructiveness of the system. He was impressed by the dramatic, even clownish aspects of these demonstrations of dissent that he was experiencing. He saw new forms of sociability flower, such as collective living spaces known as ‘communes.’ New media appeared, the so-called ‘underground press’, that carried the message outside the regular channels of information.</p>



<p>By the time one reached the 1970s – humans were living in a world of created objects. There now were more young people than in the past – who now were still not married in their early twenties – many of these were not in a university where they could have participated in creative intellectual work. Thus there were many young people who were feeling a lack of joy and happiness that membership in family can impart. So participating in a movement was – participating in the creation of a social Tool. Yes: Here was a new avenue for creative expression! There is joy and happiness to be derived from the joint creation of a Tool that can impact the external world and can help shape society.</p>



<p>Towards a New Philosophy of Creativity</p>



<p>Marcuse’s early writings already announced the basic concepts that emerged in his work towards the end of his career. Two concepts are especially important: <em>Reason –</em> the capacity to know the universal and, on that basis, to freely create projects that transcend the given; and <em>potentiality – </em>the perpetual dissatisfaction of beings with their current state as they strive for a higher state. Reason operates with universal concepts that enable the ordering of the infinite flux of experience in a coherent world. That world can be understood rationally in terms of its nature and the laws that move it. But reason is also a subjective disposition, a mode of Being. As such, it empowers the rational individual to hold the world and its own impulses at a distance. Reason thus achieves a new relation to reality. Marcuse became centrally concerned with the existential meaning of rationality in this sense &#8211; the <em>I </em>‘s central role in intellectual thought. Never in a thousand years would he have imagined – that such ideas might lead to: the Death of Philosophy!</p>



<p>The King is Dead!</p>



<p>Long Live the King!</p>



<p>In the past there has been a clear division of labor between philosophy and natural science: Philosophy will not posit ‘real’ entities, and science will not pretend to explain Consciousness.</p>



<p>For Marcuse the question was: How can a material principle play the role of constituent subjectivity. Okay: We must immediately transform gobblygook words like this into real ideas. Like &#8211; in real words &#8211; the Truth we must face is: There is an <em>I </em>in our brain that is a hydrogen ion. Yes: It is &#8211; a physical entity. However, it doesn’t stop there. All physical things are made of particles – which possess Consciousness. What is Consciousness? We do not know and never will. It is given a word that recognizes this ignorance – it is a word that all scientists wish to avoid – but if they could only face it – accept it &#8211; employ the Powers it does Possess – they could still Fire up these Powers – and use them to help humans survive on this rock in the sky.</p>



<p>Consciousness is simply: Magic! Yes – that is the word. Which actually means – nothing. Since we have no idea what it is and never will. Still We know what it does. Which fact must be responded to with: Great Respect! Consciousness possesses great Power! It can create Tools. So Yes: There are things that we never will know. However, we are Homo sapiens – we have a cognitive Power never before seen on Earth – although we are receiving hints that humble things such as submicroscopic hydrogen ions can, could, and are doing amazing things. There is a ninety-nine percent chance that they created Life!</p>



<p>So we do not know what Consciousness is, as we said before – but we do know it can possess tremendous capability. It can build: Tools. Humans each possess such a hydrogen ion – so they too each possess tremendous potential – either working alone – but in most cases if they somehow can stop fighting each other – and simply – work together.</p>



<p>In the end &#8211; all devolves – as Marcuse suspected &#8211; into the question of the <em>I </em>. To disalienate philosophical reason, the real subject must be acknowledged behind the veil of Magic. In the end philosophy falls into biology with the realization that the <em>I </em>in every living entity is a hydrogen ion – which is a physical thing. This physical thing becomes part of the human brain as long as an organism lives and during this time is in fact: An item of biology. So every aspect of philosophy from Plato to existentialism becomes a description of the structure and workings of the human brain – from the ‘inside out’.</p>



<p>Okay – so where are we? The answer is: Obvious. We have our work cut out for us. We simply must build a new philosophy. Sounds easy?: No – such words imply that we really need – to build a totally new world society – from the bottom up &#8211; founded upon Creativity.</p>



<p>Man, Woman as Commodities</p>



<p>As we say: When families lived on farms, it was easier to keep things straight. Well, Dad was like a tractor – he was a tool that dug the ditches irrigated the crops. But he was also the entrepreneur. He was a creator. He ran a business that made food. In this way the entire family was part of a creative unit. There was physical creativity – the family produced children. There was intellectual creativity – the family came up with ideas about which crops might be most lucrative for income during the next ten years. There was Cosmic creativity – the family actually impacted the world – put its ideas to work making food for the world to eat. As we say: Babies. Marx always forgot about these: Farming was a very satisfying creative way of Life.</p>



<p>Then there was the city. As Marx pointed out: Most people lost the creative aspects of their lives except for physical creativity – that is, having children. Even the work of people who had gone to college and learned how to use their brains – well, often their work became routinized, stressful, boring. And as we all know: for some reason city people tend to have fewer children – so city people have displayed less and less creativity generally. People in general simply have fewer and fewer creative opportunities. Many are capable of earning enough money to meet their physical needs.- yet many are feeling more and more as if they are merely ‘Tools’ themselves in an economic system. Creativity is the only source of joy and happiness. People are becoming more and more unhappy. People are becoming more and more angry.</p>



<p>And now things are getting worse! Social media is raising its ugly head! This is an activity which is supposedly recreational and thus body and mind renewal in its positive aspects. Yet is it not obvious that the consumer in this instance – has in fact – in many instances and many aspects of his or her life &#8211; has simply become – a commodity – himself – herself! This is worse &#8211; far worse &#8211; than becoming just a tool. A tool is usually amply compensated – its one defect is: It just does not render joy and happiness to its provider. A commodity on the other hand – is merely consumed – with less and less compensation – certainly in a monetary sense – in social media the consumer pays to be a commodity. A person on line – becomes an implement which some rich people utilize to make indecent profits. People are becoming implements in most ways – finally Marx’s warnings are seeming to becoming True. People are more and more in debt – they have entered a Life filled with a type of slavery! People talk to each other and supply all the content. In social media people do benefit from conversations and interactions just as they do in a phone call – yet they are paying for a commodity that they themselves are providing. In addition, they are innundated by advertisements directed by analysis of, alogrhythms processing, their data. People are creating – well, they have become &#8211; the commodities being consumed and are paying far too much in the process.</p>



<p>There is another level to this – that is even more cynical – even more disturbing: Social media has an indirect cost that goes far beyond simple expenditure of money. A person has a finite lifetime. Time is given to a person freely at birth – but it is finite and therefore precious. Social media supposedly is providing entertainment and refueling of the human Tool, the human machine that produces goods for the economy. But social media is offering that Tool as a commodity for consumption at a cost to the living commodity him or herself and he or she is paying with a resource that is far more far more precious than that of money. People are losing minutes of their lives and are paying for this abuse. In the case of the sex worker – well, he or she is providing a service – yet after a while it must become obvious that in this case the worker is also definitely: The commodity. This commodization of lives and time might be rationalized as being a necessary part of rendering a service for which one is hopefully being paid in a sufficient manner. But in the instance of social media this is definitely not the case. Companies are making rich profits at the expense of a hapless population. And people are getting more and more angry. They are becoming more and more unhappy.</p>



<p>Man, Woman, and Creativity</p>



<p><a></a> Our lives are now filled with non-Nature. Well, tools are peculiar: they are biological – like a spider’s web – we are the ape that creates tools – so – yes they are biological – Yet: Not! And yes commodities are also biological in an increasingly stretched out relationship with tools and apes: Yet Not! And then we: Are becoming commodities ourselves – the height of indignities! We have no idea what just happened &#8211; it would take us several weeks to straighten things out. We mean: At this point are we still even biological creatures? – or has Zuckenberg somehow made us – a wrench. Well: We shall merely merrily just continue on – as if – we are somehow unaffected.</p>



<p>We must just stop right now – right here and acknowledge again one truth: <em>Dasein</em>. When we were undergoing Industrial Revolution: Yes, we were lifting man and woman up out of the Dark Ages. We could afford to overlook ‘externalities’ &#8211; that such transformation might be causing: Fouling the air, polluting the environment. But that excitement is past. Now we are like a spider with its web. The web in our case is not just some strange object we might run into out there in the external world. Our ‘web’ is very much apart of us as the web is to the spider. However, we are different from the spider: the web is not a product of instinct and so is out of control of our <em>I</em>. Our tools were made by our<em> I</em> s and thus were not implanted into our DNA like the spider web. As Creators we must take responsibility for extensions of our <em>I </em>s into the external world – placing the future of humanity in jeopardy &#8211; just as Tools like social media are degrading our humanity.</p>



<p>Man, Woman and the Future</p>



<p>We must simply go back to the farm – way of life: Where there is creativity at every level – there is joy and happiness. There is little anger. There is little reason to be angry at anyone or anything beyond – the weather. We looked at such a world in our book: <em>Omicron Blue </em><em>&#8211; </em>which was written 50 years ago.</p>



<p><em>Omicron Blue</em> was written in another century – addressing a future wherein: We are &#8211; right now! According this book: By this point 2023 &#8211; machines could and should have taking over their rightful place in our lives by now &#8211; and humans must have rightfully stopped being ‘Tools’! So &#8211; automated cities: Piles of tools should be making all we need and people then would be able to just concentrate upon being: Well, People &#8211; being human beings instead of being parts of machinery. Instead: Not only do we still claim the same status as Tools – our lives have become completely filled with and we have become dependent upon all the commodities – that tools make. We are immersed into a complete material world – a world that machinery and people are working hard to fill every aspect of our Lives with material things &#8211; to help keep the economies moving.</p>



<p>People are bored. They are looking for the next Big thing: Big truck &#8211; Big gun. Only Creativity gives one joy and happiness. Our schools are trying – trying very hard. But in the end &#8211; we the people must simply arise and take care of things ourselves. Groups, clusters of people thinking, working together is why humans have survived in the past. Creative clusters must arise again and lead the way – towards the Future</p>



<p>People nowadays need each other. They need to be working together somehow in ways in which they feel they are creative – that they are making a beneficial impact upon the world. We need creative Clusters wherein all are participating – wherein all are contributing to a creativity &#8211; that really changes things – really impacts the world for the better. This is not some idle work that we can just kind of throw together in a moment. It will require thinking at the highest level. It will require infrastructure.</p>



<p>So, my friends &#8211; philosophy in its traditional sense must now be declared Dead! People are being paid a lot of money to keep stating the same biological things over and over again. And they are not biologists!</p>



<p>No &#8211; philosophers must move to other subjects – to another level of work that can really help people. We need to start taking the whole matter of creativity seriously. That is: Creating things besides new people – more people. The earth is finite. We need to stop population explosion. Instead &#8211; we need ideas. We need innovation of every type: Contribution at every level towards accomplishment &#8211; that truly helps &#8211; truly changes things for the better &#8211; joy and happiness for all who are involved. Every day people are becoming less and less creative. They are becoming more and more like Tools. And now they are even becoming mere commodities – providing their bodies and time to a world – and paying for the privilege for doing this! This is: Insanity!</p>



<p>But solutions are not simple: We can’t just pile up machinery and let it make a bunch of stuff that we really need. We can’t simply stop consuming ourselves. Because – as the French Revolution displayed to the world: Humanity is always an inch away from boredom – and the mob. We must remain aware that people must remain occupied – always doing something – almost anything &#8211; or they will just simply start killing each other. We are unlike all other animals – we mean, all Life is predicated upon Death. But no species kills itself – except for the human species.</p>



<p>So these are the types of questions that philosophers should be addressing instead of the stupid ones they chant in a matra over and over again that are related to biology which are real and important – but actually someone else’s concern. Philosophers need to move on They need to be considering truly monumental questions – such as we have broached above. Humanity has simply evolved to become: Too smart. The trick is: If people are creative: They receive joy and happiness. But again &#8211; we are too smart: We don’t need more children – which is the only sure way for people to be creative in a non-intellectual way. So the question is: Can people work in groups – can the groups can be creative and will participation in such creativity provide the joy and happiness &#8211; we intelligent mammals truly seek?</p>



<p>Around 1980, the world was presented with a musical: ‘Sweeny Todd’ – in which human beings are served up as hamburger. It is/was an example of a cautionary tale gone very much wrong. Our hero is Andy Warhol: He simply gave us – a soup can. He did not stand on a pedestal in Central Park and proclaim that he was a postmodernist or something. He just simply: Gave us a – can. His message: Two-thirds of the world is being left behind. Americans have little Culture. Beware!</p>



<p>The authors of this minibook are concentrating on both: Breakthroughs in science – and breakthroughs in music theory. ‘Sweeny Todd’ was supposed to change people’s behavior. It failed. Perhaps better Culture will be able to – get the message out!</p>



<p>Now is the time for a Change – for the Better. Come join us today! We are starting from scratch. We must all Build this new world – together!</p>



<p>THE END</p>



<p>` Bibliography</p>



<p>Feenberg, Andrew,, <em>The Ruthless Critique of Everything Existing – Nature and Revolution in Marcuse’s Philosophy of Praxis</em> (Brooklyn, N.Y., Verso, 2023) 236 pp.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-amazon wp-block-embed-amazon"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Man And Woman As Commodities" type="text/html" width="317" height="476" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen style="max-width:100%" src="https://read.amazon.com/kp/card?preview=inline&#038;linkCode=kpd&#038;ref_=k4w_oembed_OMtG0F56ftk0o7&#038;asin=B0CG3RTTGK&#038;tag=kpembed-20"></iframe>
</div></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://cftheater.info/blog/man-and-woman-as-commodities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
